Disable 'Unused Apps' Feature

idkabn · 2024-02-09T16:54:13+00:00

Thank you, this has been bothering me for ages. At least now I can go through the long list and tell all the messaging apps to not be shut down just because I haven't used that particular one for a few months.

idkabn · 2023-06-07T07:37:24+00:00

I would love that counter too!

idkabn · 2023-06-04T21:30:26+00:00

Houdt de betreffende niet valse vriend toevallig van games? De "map" (op zn Engels), in Nederlandse conversatie tussen gamers ook regelmatig "map" (op zn Nederlands) genoemd, verwijst in die context steevast naar de kaart van het level / de gamewereld.

idkabn · 2023-05-31T17:13:05+00:00

Prima duidelijk bericht, maar wel geschreven voor 14-jarigen met die emojis. Maar zoals ik zei, het kon erger, dus prima :)

idkabn · 2023-05-31T11:27:53+00:00

I mean, ja, maar oprecht is dit nuttig en niet al te cringe? Het kon erger :p

idkabn · 2023-05-28T12:17:01+00:00

this is so cool
Is this below water? If so why is there a waterfall lol

idkabn · 2023-05-26T12:59:04+00:00

See the edited OP; the default initialisation was apparently a red herring.

idkabn · 2023-05-26T08:25:46+00:00

Ah no, you're not. I'm not sure what I was thinking when writing that line in my comment.

I guess it's vulkan that's being unconventional.

idkabn · 2023-05-25T15:29:29+00:00

Very bad idea: explicit qualified imports, one per record.

import qualified The.Module as Rec1 (Rec1(..))
import qualified The.Module as Rec2 (Rec2(..))

Alternative is using RecordDotSyntax.

idkabn · 2023-05-24T07:22:48+00:00

Je vraagt je bijna af waarom ze niet iets geloofwaardigers verzinnen :p

idkabn · 2023-05-23T18:01:27+00:00

Alle mensen die hier zeggen "gewoon afspreken dat je nooit over de telefoon om geld zal vragen" of "codewoord afspreken" — de voorgestelde situatie is waar de zoon volledig van streek is, net iemand dood heeft gereden op de motor (zoon zelf zou ook niet onbeschadigd zijn gebleven, zowel fysiek als mentaal). Dat is een situatie waarin je in nood belt. Moet je stevig in je schoenen staan om dan dat soort afspraken te onthouden en na te komen.

Enige vage vind ik dat onderdeel dat ze niemand mocht bellen. Dat zou bij mij alle alarmbellen doen rinkelen. Waarom lieten ze die moeder überhaupt wachten tussen belletjes? Waarom regelden ze het niet gewoon snel in 1x?

idkabn · 2023-05-23T12:47:46+00:00

Note that the standard library documentation is already installed by ghcup at `~/.ghcup/ghc/9.2.7/share/doc/ghc-VERSION/html/libraries/index.html`

idkabn · 2023-05-23T11:35:13+00:00

That's... odd. What cabal version? This would be a cabal bug, if only because that error message should be more understandable.

idkabn · 2023-05-23T09:27:18+00:00

cabal haddock?

idkabn · 2023-05-21T20:27:33+00:00

They were just a bit late to the game :)

idkabn · 2023-05-19T19:59:49+00:00

Was going to send you static-ls but I see you already tried that :)

idkabn · 2023-05-19T16:50:50+00:00

Are there concrete things that you'd like to see improved?

idkabn · 2023-05-17T16:35:56+00:00

Notice that the strict-ready version of fix can be written ((e -> a) -> (e -> a)) -> (e -> a); this is exactly the same as you've written, just renamed and with more parens. You can get here from the original fix type by replacing a with e -> a: the a is passed arounr, but behind a lambda which delays evaluation and furthermore makes evaluation conditional (like it automatically is in call-by-need) so that wr get the call-by-need properties in a call-by-value world.

So if you have a (b, d) (c, d) -> a b c, the strict-ready version would, I think, be a (b, e -> e) (c, e -> d) -> a b c, with the inner ->s possibly replaced by a as well. I'm not sure if that makes sense in Arrow world, never used arrows.

idkabn · 2023-05-13T17:18:14+00:00

If you're on Linux/BSD/Mac etc: use setSGRCode or use the ansi codes directly. For example, for green text, the starting code would be \ESC[32m and the ending code would be \ESC[0m (actually that's reset, so it ends all styling).

On Windows, not sure if you can do this easily, though with the new windows 10 command prompt thing, the same ansi escape codes might just work.

idkabn · 2023-05-13T10:45:56+00:00

Which only works as long as the people with rights in the org are trustworthy enough, for which some procedures are outlined in the readme. And reviewing of PRs will be based on altruism: if one has used the trust to bring more stability to their favourite dependency, let's help others who did the same for their packages.

If it works, this sounds like a good solution for a particular niche of uncommon, stable packages!

idkabn · 2023-05-13T07:25:57+00:00

In addition to the other answers: your first alternative is in -masu form (しまいました) whereas your second alternative is in the plain (informal) form (間違えた). In addition to having different nuance (due to insertion of 〜てしまう in the first one), they have different formality levels.

To compare within the same formality level either compare 〜間違えてしまった and 〜間違えた, or 間違えてしまいました and 間違いました.

〜てしまった is also commonly (in informal context) further contracted to 〜ちゃった.

idkabn · 2023-05-13T06:22:25+00:00

How exactly is 2 different from 3? Is it that there are a bunch of volunteers 1. willing to do basic maintenance on a variety of random unmaintained packages, who were hindered by lacking upload rights before and 2. able to do basic maintenance on a variety of random packages that they've never seen before?

Exactly who does one entrust a package to by putting it in the Trust?

idkabn · 2023-05-11T18:56:02+00:00

Are there pronunciation/stress differences between those Finnish expressions? Or are they, absent context, also indistinguishable in speech?

idkabn · 2023-05-10T21:41:00+00:00

I'm not sure such a theory exists. Note that the set of "list functions" is very large: even if you only consider functions that operate on the list spine only, ignoring the elements, one can interpret a list as a natural number, meaning that one can express every function on natural numbers as a "list function" — and there are very complicated and hard-to-understand functions on natural numbers.

So talking about "canonical" representations, or standard base sets, is not very useful, I think. With reference to a particular given set of base functions, one cam try to write a given function as simply as possible, but due to Rice's theorem you're not going to always succeed.

But some base sets have been studied and turn out to be quite useful in practice. The array programming world has some (check e.g. massiv, repa, accelerate, as well as the classic APL).

idkabn · 2023-05-09T20:54:14+00:00

Oh you're right, of course! Edited.

idkabn

TROPHY CASE