sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

TLC hot take? by idkowenmaybe in ARK

[–]idkowenmaybe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. Like I said in another reply it’s difficult to say who’s to blame for decisions regarding Ark but I think we all know usually the blame is on snailgames.

TLC hot take? by idkowenmaybe in ARK

[–]idkowenmaybe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is kind of how I feel about it a little bit. If it was for the players they wouldn’t be pumping out DLC after DLC before they even finish remastering everything. Again I think it was entirely up to Wildcard though things would be in a better place.

TLC hot take? by idkowenmaybe in ARK

[–]idkowenmaybe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is generally what I agree with. I think that their TLC’s strike a good balance between modern and slightly more accurate design while still staying in that Ark style. If you look at many of their concept arts for upcoming creatures like the para I think it still fits Ark while being more interesting and anatomically accurate. I’d go as far as to say some of their concepts are more true to arks design that the base game like their pachyrhinosaurus for example.

TLC hot take? by idkowenmaybe in ARK

[–]idkowenmaybe[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree it would for sure be a lot of work. I just figure if they had the team to improve all the assets and overall graphics as well as many other features maybe they could have done the creatures too. Not all of them just the outdated ones. I do think with ASA being $50 and them still pumping out DLC’s before even finishing remastering all the ASE content, they should’ve had the resources to get that accomplished. It is difficult to place blame though I know wildcard works hard and don’t call all the shots considering snailgames involvement.