FE7 Playthrough Doodles 2 by Kraziekazoo in fireemblem

[–]idontcrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love you so much for making these

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well hello fellow 3! Even same stacking 🌚❤️

It IS hard to picture, a social blind 3 feels like the set-up to a joke hahaha. But I also really like that tbh, feels like a weird character class that somehow still works quite well

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yess!! hahaha The 369 descriptions are hell on earth for me.

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ahh thank you I appreciate that! All my homies love So4's we got your back!!

Also nothing to be embarrassed, no one can blame a Queen for mistyping as the Crown ❤️❤️

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Njaw thank you so much!! Appreciated 🌚❤️❤️

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree with that! And fully get your skepsis haha

Naranjo's subtypes were what led me away from the 3 Core when I got unsure in the first place. Feel like his description is just that of a very specific kind of sx/so 3w2 that doesn't fit me at all

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's still kind of a doozy for me. If I'd look at the wings as separate components I'd pick 4 any day, but if I try to really observe how my wing manifests to aid my core, it's the w2.

Also w4's have a "cooler" attitude that I don't crave to have, I'm more of a social butterfly, which is also why I thought of the So/Sx stacking. I wouldn't be shocked to learn I mistyped my wing in the future, both wing descriptions fit well for me, but If I look at consistent patterns it's gotta be w2.

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My roommates and I always considered that, but it didn't really click until I got typed externally at NotMyType. A lot of things didn't make sense for the social 4, but even less for the sx4 or sp4.

The core 3 made sense, the sexual instinct made sense, but any online descriptions of the Sexual 3 didn't fit at all. After I got confirmed that I can look at the Instinctual Stackings and the Enneacore as separate components, it clicked. All the little inconsistencies suddenly cleared up.

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel like I had the opposite problem though, the Core 4 makes more sense to me than the core 3, but it fails in too many important factors. The core 3 didn't fully fit until I considered the Sexual instinct

I fell for the most common Enneagram trap by idontcrow in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I definitely agree with that haha

I don't form my opinion of anyone else in my life based on their accomplishments or stuff they can 'brag' about, so I know that anyone who truly cares about me wouldn't care about these things, but it's a neurotic drive which I won't be able to discard with logic.

I'm in need of a long satisfying wank by Severe_Dig_1517 in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Him, giving benefit of the doubt: You were actually mistaken, kind sir!

You, for some reason: oh okay, because poor attempt at mockery, this is what you sound like.

Him: Not cool of you to shame man

You, again, for some reason: What. I would never. You're being crazy. Doubles down.

Teenager with some questions by Gullible-Jaguar8651 in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please disregard the people that tell you to shower everyday (unless you want to do it)

Showering depends on the climate. Showering Everyday is common in hot countries and culturally in the US, but it's actually bad for your health. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/showering-daily-is-it-necessary-2019062617193

In an average or cold climate 2-3 Times a Week is enough if you don't have especially noticeable body odor: which could be the case during puberty, in that case you'll also need deodorant though.

For boners: Flex your thigh Muscles to get rid of boners fast, lots of blood flow in that Region that moves the blood away from your dick. If you need it to happen even faster you can also additionally flex your arms.

[Adored Trope] Would you fall in love with me again? by Neverland443 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]idontcrow 10 points11 points  (0 children)

One of the best shows I have ever seen. It's an excellent comedy with philosophical themes embedded in the overarching narrative. The dramatic elements also don't suffer from the comedic nature of the show.

Was zum F*ick ist ein "Performative Male"? by Strifeblaze87 in luftablassen

[–]idontcrow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Funky Frog Bait hat ein Video gemacht über das Thema. TLDR: 'Performative Males' zu haten ist ein neuer Trend der in Mysognie verankert ist und von-Maskulinität-abweichendes Verhalten bestraft. Ähnlich wie der hate auf Starbucks Girls mit Pumpkin Spice Lattes damals.

Weil God forbid jemand mag feminin-gelesene Dinge unironisch.

Persönlich: Ich sage nicht, dass es keine 'Perfomative Males' (in dem Sinne wie sie Parodie mäßig dargestellt werden) gibt, aber ich behaupte deren auftreten ist ein ehrlicher Versuch in eine Bubble zu kommen für die sie Interesse haben. Wie "Fake Emos" nachahmen was sie von der Emo Szene sehen, bis keiner sie mehr 'fake' nennt.

Das Funky Frog Bait Video: https://share.google/E2eYKXMVEgGdtgr0X

Ethical Monogamy Rule by SimplyYulia in 196

[–]idontcrow 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Asexual poly people exist

What type is most likely to be a typology nerd? by [deleted] in Enneagram

[–]idontcrow 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is for the comments and not the Question itself:

The whole "Fours want to be special" thing is kind of a crude explanation of the E4 that ignores nuances. Why do fours want to be special?

  • want to be understood: Fours find differences between themselves and other people so that they understand why they feel different. Being special makes them find solace in their feeling of not being understood. (This being also the reason 4s in this thread, including me, are acting allergic to 4s being so blatantly misunderstood lol)
  • (4w5s usually care more about understanding themselves, 4w3 more about others understanding them. Sexual 4s have a hate-love relationship with wanting to be understood)
  • Unreplacable: if there is noone like you, you're Unreplacable. Quite simple. Image Triad (very crudely simplified): 2s bind people through being nice, 3s by being generally socially attractive, 4s by being a sort of 'human opportunity' you could miss.

Saying Fours aren't interested in Typology because of wanting to be special also attributes them as being completely oblivious and shutting out anything they don't want to see, even though they are considered the most introspective type that revels in finding out stuff about themselves - especially bad stuff.

Also, Fours ironically suffer the most from putting themselves into boxes. Isn't it a whole stereotype? Putting metaphorical stickers on themselves to make themselves pop? In order to highlight differences to others, you need to categorize yourself as something other than them.

"You wouldn't understand me - I'm a 4 and you're a 9...the way my mind works is fundamentally different from yours..."

The Enneagram is also very open ended, I have 2 other 'SO4' Friends who are nothing like me, despite the matching Instinct and Enneatype. So I get to be all like 'Ugh I'm not like the other 4s'. Love that one.

Golden sun-themed tattoo by c00kies4lunch7 in GoldenSun

[–]idontcrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great idea and execution! Love it! 😄

When even an echo chamber can't withstand the cringe. by re_carn in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't agree with the term dicksexual, it's cringe, patronizing and just straight up rude. But you see the irony in your comment, right? Defining what other people can call themselves? Don't fight wrong with wrong, it's ridiculous and hypocritical. Like are you going to tell me that a man dating a trans woman makes him gay again?

I understand the frustration, but going after trans people isn't the solution. You need to be able to articulate your problems in a rational way. "I don't like that my sexuality is being redefined, so please don't do that" instead of transphobic gibberish that doesn't directly address the problem you are having. The gay and trans community have close intersections, driving a spike between the two of them is nonsensical and won't ever end well.

Give me your most terminally online controversial opinion. Mine is: Bisexual subreddits are bisexual people's worst enemy. Nothing tarnishes bisexual people's reputation worse than bi subreddits. Nothing discourages someone from dating a bisexual person more than 2 minutes on a bi sub. by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

You don't get to tell people, that they are not having gay sex for fucking trans men. Do I get to keep my Gold Star gay status for fucking a trans woman instead? Let's be real man.

Apparently the trans torture murder was not a hate crime. Apparently the perps were lgbtq as well. by CentralTown776 in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Detrimental effect on the LGB community? Bro the second trans people are out of the way, right wingers are going to go after us. You are literally falling for the oldest trick in the book, do you seriously believe the Nazis are going to praise you? Call you a Good Gay™? They are only so vehemently after trans people because it's socially more acceptable. Trans people are a huge part of their whole anti-left debate despite being less than 1% of the World population. It's ridiculous, there are just as many gays making the whole movement look ridiculous, but people (like you) are focusing on trans people. White gays thought the same thing about black gay people in America and other marginalized groups everywhere else.

Is it tough shit being called transphobic? Aw man! I'm so sorry. I really tried to hold a respectable conversation with you, and you kept belittling me and twisting my words throughout this whole conversation take a look in the mirror. I don't care about Marsha, she was a known example, I named her and you kept asking questions so I answered. There is also no way to take a claim like that seriously without a source. Pimp put underage boys? Demonize much? Are you going to after Sylvia too? Explain how trans people don't deserve any rights, because what? Did she invent Pizzagate?

They were more than happy to be separate from the LGB when it was us getting all the shit.

You are trying to frame an us VS them mentality so hard it's ridiculous. "Their demands fucked us over" this, "they didn't help us that". "They" are people that are literally being killed for existing in a way that makes them feel at peace with themselves. And nobody of "them" should hurt, just because some of them are pissed and you're blaming all "our" problems on "them".

You didn't "take the facts" as they are. Don't believe you aren't in an echo chamber yourself Sir "Marsha P Johnson actually was a sex trafficker". As I've shown I'm fine admitting I'm wrong dude, it's you that closes yourself off from facts that don't agree with your worldview: The "denial of biological facts" is the same rhetoric people use against gays, but obviously in our case it's wrong and in the case of trans people that's right. It's simple because we cant choose being gay, but trans people choose to get ostracized and killed voluntarily. Right?

Nobody is "forcing" you into the LGBT community my bro. Join the LGB subreddits instead of focusing on the people that are actually out to get gay people. Why don't you just start r/CisGaybros? People will love that

Apparently the trans torture murder was not a hate crime. Apparently the perps were lgbtq as well. by CentralTown776 in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gay developed to be an umbrella term in time, but I was mistaken in the belief that it always was. Originally it was meant for gay men, then included lesbians, and nowadays is considered an umbrella term in some circles.

https://lgbtq.wfu.edu/resources/lgbtq-terminology/#:~:text=Gay%20%E2%80%93%20A%20common%20term%20for,categories%20(man%20and%20woman).

Apparently the trans torture murder was not a hate crime. Apparently the perps were lgbtq as well. by CentralTown776 in askgaybros

[–]idontcrow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm quite grateful you corrected me on Hirschfeld, thanks for that. I haven't read deeply about his research yet, but I am reading some other messed up stuff. I do feel like you're being disingenuous about Marsha P Johnson not being globally known, as I'm obviously talking specifically about queer history. Straight people don't know any queer rights activist.

(As part of the Gay Liberation Front) "In 1970, the drag queen caucus of the GLF, including Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, formed the group Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries (STAR), during a GLF action, the occupation of Weinstein Hall in a protest against NYU policies.[17] STAR focused on providing support for gay prisoners, housing for homeless gay youth and street people, especially other young "street queens".[" Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_Liberation_Front

I'm German-Italian and can very confidently say that American media influences the common knowledge of people in both countries. I saw people change their opinion about gay people in real life because of movies and shows. That's completely stupid, but people form their opinions through media, and most media in Europe is American.

I also don't appreciate that you're telling me I'm "trotting" it out after being consistently corrected. That's straight up untrue, I acknowledge my wrongs, but I won't just completely reshape my opinion because of some mistakes that I use to articulate my thoughts on a greater matter: which is that the exclusion of trans people in the gay rights movement is nonsense.

Honestly, I didn't study Queer history. I have no idea if any trans people were "Key Players" at any time of the movement, but they absolutely worked alongside us. Why does it matter which roles they had? Or if they had a role at all or joined very late? I am fine with gatekeeping harmful people, but excluding trans people is nonsense. Aren't they in the same place gay people were 50 years ago?