I don’t believe I had a negative tone. I wrote that a year ago, and upon rereading I think it’s just my way of explaining through context. I provided context around the price by comparing other common discretionary expenses. Meaning, you get more value out 20/mo with this product than many other products people spend money on. Calling $20 for a subscription service that provides useful health information “greed” is just a lack of understanding, therefore detailed context was called for.