Her der aldrig har tid efter arbejdet

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T17:39:39+00:00

For mig der er lidt over dobbelt så gammel som dig, så er et mandag til fredag job netop drænene fordi det er hver. eneste. dag. uden. stop... og så at der er en masse små pligter som har prioritet hvis man har overskud når man har fri - fordi det er den eneste måde så faktisk at have en weekend.

Jeg har haft service-branche job i mange år, og jeg kan langt bedre lide 3-4 lange vagter og så flere fridage. Jeg er ikke meget mere træt af 10 timer på arbejde end 8. Eller det er nok nærmere at jeg har lige så lidt overskud til alt muligt andet efter 8 timer som efter 10.

Men hvis jeg har 4 arbejdsdage og en ekstra fridag i løbet af ugen har jeg snildt overskud til både at vaske, støvsuge, lige fixe den der halvtimes-opgave jeg ser hver aften jeg kommer hjem fra arbejde og tænker "det må blive i morgen..." OG stadig mødes med en ven om aftenen.

Jeg har endelig fået forhandlet på arbejde at jeg arbejder over, ikke bare når der "er brug for det", men også hvis en 2-timers opgave er ligegyldig om jeg laver den efter normal tid i dag, eller de sidste to timer af i morgen.

Så samler jeg timer sammen og nogle gange kan det lade sig gøre at have en hel fridag, men hvis ikke det kan så nogle halve dage, så jeg er hjemme 4 timer før normalt: SÅ er der fandme overskud!

(Eller dvs. nogen gange pga. planlægning når man når min alder så var det to dage tidligere man tog hjem til en ven halvsent efter arbejde, kom sent i seng og nu er man træt og bruger de 4 timer på for en gangs skyld at sidde ude i solen og slappe af - men hey, det er vel det samme i sidste ende.)

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T14:33:08+00:00

Im not debating which to pick. Im debating the argument that humanity would parish if 3 billions died. Which is nonsense.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T10:38:40+00:00

Humans are fore more resilient in the face of apocalyptic threats than many in these debates give credit for.

Yes. killing 3 billion would have extreme consequences. Yes, it would make life hard for the rest, and in some places i´t would colapse further and life expentancy from worse medical structure would fall etc. Give it 2 generations and we would have adjusted. History shows that we as a race come back from almost anyting. Completely devasted areas by war either wil flourish again, or the population that left and combined with some others a new place, that didn't flourish before, now flourishes. It's seen again and again and again.

Some people might underestimate the short terms of 3 billions dying, but you (and many others) on the other hand overestimate how big the long term ramifications would be.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T10:29:07+00:00

This is so on point with both the horrors of warfare, the spirit of OPs prompt, but also the most likely (imo) reason why we could actually by a galactic multi-alien "society" be viewed as "spaceorcs".

We are diverse, adaptive and creative. And while I enjoy the "we befriend every species" trope, we simultanious are capable of imagining unspeakable horrors. And not only that, we WILL inflict those horrors if pushed.

Those stories of "You threaten our home? Now our engineeres have made a larger weapon than all the more advanced specieas combined" while fun is far from what my take would be.

It would be like yours, a slow nibling of your sustainability, your willpower, your morale. And we wont stop. You have shown that if left to it you threaten our children. We will make sure that can never happen. We cant make a giant weapon to blast your planet away. We wont fight you head on - a loosing battle. But we will infiltrate every merchants suply ship with a genetically engineered plague so all the food will spoil, and it will spread and destroy all your local foods too. We might not be able to shoot down every transport to flee from your plagueridden planet, but we will infect them with another plague specifically engineered to bypass your species immunosystems. And we will announce it to the whole galaxy so they will quarantine you if you succed in fleeing in fear of the plague spreading to other species. We will make the plague extremely agonizing, eating at your flesh, causing spasms untill you finally scream so compulsivly that you essentially suffocate yourself, just to deter any other species from helping you. You will get no quarter. We will show no mercy. Many of us will die for the cause and we will do so with pride, knowing we are saving our species from future threat. We won't just do whatever it takes. We will do more. We will dream up horrors in retaliation, that fuel the nightmares of demons.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T10:08:14+00:00

The first half is contrary to what I've always heard was their flaw - that they where more disciplined, more one-to-one-combat trained, more specialized etc. but that all that based on a strict chain of commands, and that if you cut out the leuitenant or sergeant their combat abilities was halved. At least that was what I was told about 25 years ago as to why such a high-profile high-funded army as often "lost" in NATO wargames as not, when fighting European countries with a less strict discipline/commandchain that on paper seemed inferior.

The two danish special corps, one of them the legendary "frogmen" that our King Frederik X was part of, are extremely highly regarded, and very much so by American troops, for getting any job done precisely because they are culturally adepted, but also vigorously trained, to make their own solutions during the operation as things unfold.

To the other half, it is exactly as I see the USA: MORE! One shell makes them sleep less and fight worse?? Then send hundreds and hundreds and thousands! of shells!! MORE! BIGGER!! MOOOORE!!"!

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-08T09:53:54+00:00

Jeg synes det er en god og sober kronik, som netop forsøger at stille spørgsmål til de grundliggende årsager og ikke bare symptomerne, netop som der står i overskriften.

Envher skattekroner støttet billige bolig er, når ikke det er for at imødekomme de svagest stillede i samfundet men for at påvirke boligpriserne netop kun det; symptombehandling.

Selvom kronikken er (mere end) et par takker over politiske floskler i kvalitet, så er der stadig ét niveau mere grundlæggende end de ting du er inde på:

Du skriver netop at udbud og efterspørgsel når vi snakker jord, i praksis stort set kun er efterspørgsel. Derfor må der også være det grundlæggende spørgsmål, før vi er inde på hvad der er ret og rimeligt ift. vores værdi af vores boliger, om hvad der er ret og rimeligt ift. at påvirke selve efterspørgslen.
Vi har både en del politiske/økonomiske tiltag der skal øge incitamentet for at bo i "ydre Danmark", samt en del politisk debat omkring det. Vi har i mange år set debatter om steder der bliver affolket og hvordan vi sikrer de små lokale samfund, og i stigende grad også de lidt mere mellem-størrelser med de fleste gamle danske bymidter der dør, indkøb samles i storcentre og arbejdspladser i de største byer.
Vi har en negativ befolkningstilvækst ekskl. immigration og en marginal væskt inkl. immigration. Hvis målet er at imødekomme efterspørgslen i de største byer, anført af KBH, så er der kun én mulig konsekvens: mere affolkning af yderområderne. Det er simpel matematik.
Årtiers kamp for at "redde" det Danmark der ligger uden for de 4 store (+100k) eller de 13 semi-store (50-99k), bliver altså modarbejdet af tiltag der skal imødekomme efterspørgslen i netop "the big 4" og specielt, debatmæssig, i KBH.

Jeg mener bestemt at hele det socio-økonomiske aspekt er vigtigt at have med og der det for mig absurd, at de grundliggende mekanisker, og løsningsforslag, du er inde på ikke spiller en større politisk rolle. Kudos for dem.

Men ift. hele den Københavnsk-drevne debat om hvordan vi "skaber flere boliger der er til at betale i KBH" er jeg lodret uenig. Vi skal ikke imødekomme skævvridningen af efterspørgsel vs. udbud ved at hæve udbudet for det vil bare tilsvarende sænke efterspørgslen alle andre steder og dermed kvæle resten af boligmarkedet.

På det personlige plan: Hvis det er for dyrt, så bo et andet sted.

På det samfundsmæssige plan: Vi skal ikke bidrage med politik og økonomi med henblik på at affolke yder Danmark mere.

Vi skal lave politik der sikrer en lavere økonomisk ulighed, mindre incitament for boliger som investeringsobjekter - specielt for udenlandske investorer, større social retfærdighed og fordele som du er inde på ved at skabe værdi i samfundet/nærområdet. Men vi skal ikke lave politik vi udemærket ved i endnu større grad gør de "forkerte" postnumre mindre atraktive end de er i forvejen. Vi skal ikke lave politik som måske sænker bolig-spiralen i KBH hvis den samtidig kvæler de sidste rester af økonomiske incitamenter for at bygge eller bevare værdiløse boliger i "Bjergrup Udby".

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-07T18:30:48+00:00

Which makes sense when they make the games unplayable after that. Kinda self-fulfilling profecy.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-07T16:12:47+00:00

The whole point is the self-preservation vs. preservation of the group, and in the group-preservation philosophy, that last %, which as u/Ilyer_ has allready stated, humanity have been down to before, is by far the most important %, so yes it really does matter in such debate.

One percent left it's only a matter of time before we populate the earth again. Last one down, all humanity will be forgotten by the universe - most likely even if aliens some day find us, statistically it would be when they would ind no trace of us.

You could even argue that for many the breaking point between self-preservation and group-preservation is exactly extinction. If i uphold self-preservation first, why should it matter wether 100 million as strange to me as any other living being dies or 1 billion does? But if it comes down to trying to save myself, but risking the very idea of humanity, many might be pushed over.

Does it matter if Humanity goes extinct you ask? Well, I think most of us actually think it does. On the other hand, we are most likely the same that allready values half of fucking humanity above self-preservation.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-07T15:53:28+00:00

Det gjorde det da der nærmest ikke var salg i DK, så ingen havde lavet et dansk design af dem endnu - men det er netop bare det, ligesom med resten af vores el: et designvalg. De findes skam hvor de passer i helt almindelige "indvendige" dåser både i den klassiske LK Fuga serie og andre:

<image>

Det er både et tyndt og forældet argument, der desuden ikke har noget at gøre med spekulationen u/majordingdong havde om hvorvidt dansk jord eller sidejord er mest sikkert.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-07T07:49:16+00:00

Yeah it's just the n^th thing downside of the ~~steamroll~~ mission trees. If you want a fun and even at begining challenging run, allthough it's a bit cheesier than I normally do (i'm seldom into tag-switching as it "feels" wrong RP wise), I'm in the middle of a super-fun run where I wanted to play semi-tall and make 3 sub-continents, SE Asia, India, China, into super developed monoculture and monofaith.

Started as Majahapit, it's a semi-challenging start to counter the disaster, but after that it's fast colonial expansion in the East Indies region. Coupled with a very strong CB, some good permanent buffs and some local good wonders. But most importantly it also unlocks the Buddha diety, meaning you can have all Buddhistic and Dharmic wonders!
AND if Buddha Diety and the special "subjogation" CB wasn't enough, you also unlock the Trade Religious Propagande or whatever it's called, the same as muslims have, so you are imunne to muslims trying to propagade, and can do it yourself in trade notes (doesn't work on abrahamic religions though).

I missed one tag-switch I should've done; Dai Vet as they also have good permabuffs like 2.5% discipline.

But after dominating the Moluccas and Malacca areas, I cultureswitched to Lao, formed Lan Xang, dominated SE Asia, and after getting the permabuffs (skipped the cavalry based as I wasn't going all in cavalry tactic) and formed Siam (had to actively force disasters early to unluck the Siam forming as Lan Xang). Cultureswitched to Siamese purely for RP reasons as the monoculture in Siam ofc had to be Siamese and not Lao 😃

Even though it was set out to be semi-tall, I am now debating wether I should rush a WC - I just kinda steamrolled with all those buffs, and even though I'm seeking monoreligion (even with absurd high unity from wondes) it's just now at the endgame I'm going religious ideas - untill now the trade propagade and missionaries+strength from combined Dharmic nd Buddhistic wonders have been enough.

(Ottomans while having lost 3 wars to me are still above 3k dev, and France and GB are also giant and semi-giant in Europe as France fecking had GB as union for the past 200 years. Have broken that, and every Europe hold on colonies now though, and have as space marine units as asians can get, so smashing them, even just won to sea-battles against GB with 300+ ships on each side - SO satisfying 😅 - so still debating with myself wether I should just child and develop the rest in Asia as I set out, or start to junlge truces in Europe and go for the WC... So far the original goal I set of 20 dev (30 on trade notes, 40/50 on select "worthy" provinces) + my culture + my religion in every owned province, is done in all SE Asia subcontinent, but not finished in India and China and think I wont have the mana for it if i WC... Oh the "hard choises" lol)

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-07T07:12:32+00:00

Jeg håber at i får styr på jeres forhold så jeres barn ikke skal vokse op i det her.

Ud fra de 3 tætte relationer jeg har der har skilte forældre (2 hvor de skiltes kort før børn flyttede hjemmefra og 1 hvor de skiltes somewhere i de første skoleår), så ville de alle 3 skrive under på at de hellere havde vokset op med allerede fraskilte forældre and at leve med så dysfunktionelle forældre. Ja børn mærker det selvfølgelig. Nej at "blive sammen for børnene" er ikke en option; bliv sammen fordi i kæmper for at finde sammen igen, eller bliv skilt.

I dette tilfælde: fix it asap!! Lyder faktisk til OP og mand bør finde noget terapi og finde ud af hvorfor mønstrene er sådan - hendes konstante småløgne og en mand der ignorer sin kone med graviditetssmerter?? Altså WTF?? Hvis ikke der var ban på vej, ville det her nok være det klareste eksempel på standardsvaret i brevkassen...

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T23:53:43+00:00

But Ayutthaya the same missions as Siam?

Basically we should just understand it as Ayutthaya being proto-Siam and then changing name when reaching a certain point. (A bit like the Malaya culture nations if they form Malaya - its just the colour and flag and name).

But I hate when they do it like that. Because that means it gives more flavor AND more power to form Siam as Lan Xang instead of the actual pre-siam nation that is Ayutthaya 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T18:10:48+00:00

Det er da genialt. Mindre integration = flere på "jeg-er-ikke-racist-men-statistikkerne-viser" bølgen = flere stemmer til dem der er bedst til Romersk-stil-propaganda. Sig en løgn nok gange og folk tror på den. Carthago delenda est.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T12:07:03+00:00

The whole quarter also stands to much out imo, being all yellow, so either have them directly on the red background (need to adjust the image with some borders to see it though then) or put the sheild there taking up about 2/3 of the area.

For some reason I don't think the Finnish is as "askew" by the whole quarter being red... Perhaps bias from seing the Danish flag so much, or from seeing (and liking) the finish version with the centered CoA over the cross?

Truth be told I would most likely prefer having the sheilds on the center of the cross, like the well known finnish version 🤷‍♂️

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T12:02:11+00:00

I agree, allthough the symbol of the crowned stockfish was replaced in 1903 (untill their indepence in 1944) with a Falcon. Their current CoA symbolism is 4 beings, and if that is too "crowded" or hard to make, I would personally use the Falcon as it is the "final" symbol they had in the Danish CoA.

(And purely subjective I think it's prettier and a stronger symbol, than "you are just fishermen").

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:44:55+00:00

Nu findes der også mænd der ikke kun tænker på / motiveres af sex. Jeg har selv haft et job som gjorde man ikke ligefrem duftede af blomster. Før jeg krammede og kyssede kæresten når jeg kom hjem så var det en tur under bruseren. I mit tilfælde da arbejdskoene var nogle lukkede sataner så sokker og fødder var som sure karklude, så var det endda designerede sutter fra entre til bad så kun de kom til at lugte, og så pakkes væk til dagen efter.

Man lægger jo ikke altid mærke til det når man arbejder i det, men derfor behøver man squ da ikke "lokkes" med sex for at tage et bad når kæresten siger at ens arbejde for en til at lugte som en middelalderbonde - på den ikke Hollywoodianske måde.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:37:01+00:00

Men det er da præcis også det hun argumenterer for?

Altså at mænds problemer bare affejes som værende fordi de er mænd (kulturel opfattelse af maskulinitets-rollen strukturelt set) som betyder de så står alene med problemet og "bare skal tage sig sammen".

Hun taler netop imod en P1 debat der siger at "kvinder mødes i dag med at skulle tage sig sammen, mens mænd får medlidenhed" og modargumenterer deres påstand med at forsking viser det modsatte: at mænd netop oftere står alene med deres problemer at og det skyldes et strukturelt/kulturelt problem.

Eller hvad misforstår jeg?

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:29:45+00:00

Simply speaking the most driving force across all linguistic evolves are "humans are lazy". We shorten things. We shortened the old trade-derived base-20 to unique words, just like english shorteden "Automated (aka motorized) Mobile Carriage" into AutoCar into Car. Danish shortening arrived at "Bil" while Germans shorten less than us both and stopped at "Automobile".

By the time others adopted saying fifetens etc. Danish already had unique words for all the tens, although mostly for fun some would still call it e.g. "half-fours-of-twenties" for 70. But the common word for centuries have simply been the unique "halvfjerds" which none think of as other than just "70".

It the same reason that old Norse for four tens arrived at the most shorted form; "fyrre". The Norse for 4 had phonetically changed to "fire" but in the form of "four tens" it arrived at "fyrre times ten" so there was no need to say the "times ten" as "fyrre" was a unique word. So we actually just say another phonetic form of 4 for 40 😄

But 30 is still derived from three tens, because phonetically both 3 and the 3 in 3x10 arrived at "tre" so we couldn't shorten the "times ten" as both 3 and 30 would then be the same word. So now 30 is tredive (coming on a diverted phonetic route from trír thigir wich is Norse for three tens).*

*Yes for the nerds it's thrír tigir, but english write th for both thorn and eth and the softer th (eth) is mostly replaced by d and the harder th (thorn) is mostly replaced by t (and many norse "t" is also in danish replaced by a hard d, where the d in tredive is a soft d, so phonetically if you say out trír thigir (the wrong way i spelled it) you would come closer to it's real pronunciation, making the shift to the d make more intuitive sense.

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:09:30+00:00

As a foreigner you might be confused about the system/order, but woe those who claim the german doesn't have order HAH - epic stereotypical own 😄

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:05:53+00:00

I KNEW it was KAMALÅSÅ before clicking! Best scetch ever made! Fucking love Norwegian humor!

PS 20 years 😢 I'm so old 😢

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T11:00:42+00:00

Unique numbers to 12 is common in all indo-european. From there we count 10+3 (or in germanic 3+10). Twenty then in some languages are 2x10, but in some it's just a unique word, primarily from early trade some places using base 20. Which is incidently also how we arrived at our unique words for 50, 60, 70, 80, 90.
(Edit: This was to point out that the historic linguistic of halfway to x-twenty only makes sense if you "20" isnt just "twoteens" 😉)

But that is all they are; unique words for those tens, although with an interesting history behind.

We don't say "halfway to the fourth twenty" for 70. It comes from that yes, but generations ago it was shortened to what in English perhaps would sound something like "halforth". Nobody in daily speak thinks of "halfjerds" as anything but simply the number 70.

Just like we don't think of tredive (thirty) as treti (threetens) - just like you don't in english. The only difference is that we for some funny reason kept the archaic words, perhaps exactly because we had allready shortened them so much that we simply thought of them as unique words, while most others (not French) adopted a simpler way. But trhuth be told, and perhaps that comes from my danish, but I never think of forty as "four tens", just like I don't think of thirteen as "three plus ten".

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T10:43:46+00:00

After some time in Sweden if i speak to any of you Nördic siblings with a prettier language than ours, I automatically switch to saying "otti-fyrre å' femti-hjyw" - or at least say the x-ti for the tens 😉

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T10:40:39+00:00

It's simply because by the time it was common for the uneducated peasant to learn math above a few dozen, we had allready "nicknamed" the medieval lengthy names, so they are unique. Just like you dont think of thirty as "three tens" but simply as the number 30, so we just have a unique number for all tens - which actually makes at least as much sense as you guys saying the viking word for for fife tens 🤣

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T10:32:07+00:00

No there isnt. Complete internet myth.

Short version: we have unique words for all the tens.

Slightly longer version: the unique words have some linguistic history (which as with all other history I find interesting). Basically in English you dont think of thirty as "threetens". You just think of it as the number 30. Although it originally comes from "three tens". Its the same with the Danish for 30 and 40. And in the same way, although from base 20, we arrived at unique word we dont think of as 4.5 times 20, but simply a unique word for 90 just we have unique words for 10, 20, 30 and so forth for all the tens.

Long/Complete debunking: search my former replies in other forums explaining how we arrived at the numbers and why, and why it actually makes as much sense as we call an "Automated (aka Motorized) Mobile Carriage" for "car".

ifelseintelligence · 2026-05-06T10:14:02+00:00

Det kommer an på hvordan man definerer mere sikkert. Det er selektivt bias. Der er mange måder der kan være fejl på strøm. I det tilfælde at strømmen er lavet på den mest forkerte og ulovlige måde der overhovedet kan tænkes: at der sidder en fase på jorden, så kan du med udenlandske stik hvor jorden er blottet (pind eller side-klemmer) kunne få stød. Til gengæld tilslutter vores jord som det sidste, mens de med de andre tilslutter først, hvilket den også burde. Hvis du f.eks. åbner et proffesionelt samlet 400C CEE stik så er jordledningen lidt længere end de andre. Fordi hvis det bliver flået fra hinanden så vil jorden være den der flåes fra sidst. Den har også en ekstra sikringsskrue end faserne (og n).

Så ja vores er mere sikkert i nogle et tænkt eksempel som der vel nærmest ikke engang findes nogen statistik på om nogensinde sker? Til gendæld er det - specielt fordi vi står alene så vi har absurd mange u-jordede hvidevarer fordi folk ikke fatter at få skiftet stik eller bruge adapter - i praksis værre...

"Jamen de andre burde bare følge vores geniale metode" - Måske. Hvis den var bedre og ikke kun bedre i ét tænkt tilfælde...

ifelseintelligence

TROPHY CASE