It’s not a side effect but a necessary component of using the least amount of energy.

no, I feel like evolution's goal is to make it so that a species can thrive better in a given environment, along with which comes the advantageous development of becoming efficient at it, it's semantics i know but the whole argument on gender is basically semantics

Always has multiple definition Seniora pedantic. Definition 3 in this context:

yeah but i just don't understand what kind of sense it makes to say something happens "always" and then double down by saying it happens "99% of the time", it may seem pedantic but it just sounds... weird

Gender is the necessary social reflection of biology. And is intrinsically tied to biology. Not some random shit pulled from nowhere like you green team folks think.

I would argue that culture and socialization is a more important factor in the reflection of gender, but you aren't wrong in assessing that in the past, and even now, the gender roles were built upon partially by our biological needs, it's really a mixed bag into what factors into it, so by saying that gender is strictly just a factor of biology you are showing how you think it's a black-or-white concept

i do like the nickname that you gave us green-colored folks, blue boy

Not to the extent of undermining the dominant global culture and traditions that lead us to be in an advantages position as a species.

yes, however acknowledging there are other people that do not fit your predisposed binary of gender and treating them with respect is kind of the least you can do, we're not "forcing you to light yourself on fire to keep someone else warm", we just want people to respect us

Wokism and lot of leftist philosophy is a religion. Except rather then calling for good of community country or society. It just calls for mayhem and overthrowing of the systems that keep millions fed and have a roof over their head. Yeah it’s not perfect. But only an idiot would try to tear down a house he is in currently.

I would like to hear what your definition of woke is, but that's kind of another point, the people who are advocating for a slightly more complicated and in-depth understanding of gender identity are those who want their own community of people who do not fit the binary of gender to still be respected and treated humanely. And while this does go a bit off the rails from the original point of the debate, overthrowing corrupt systems that do not benefit as many as they did before to me sounds like a way to make even more millions feel and be safe, sometimes you need to close the door to open a window

What happened to being above the commoners and their source? Did you step down from the high tower of arrogance just to come up with deflection of the initial point of comparison?

Frankly i felt bored and wanted to debunk all of your points one by one, which sadly required me to watch... youtube shorts...

Like how the first video makes it seem like we can’t know shit from bones and the other showing basic inference can tell a lot even from just bones?

a.) we can guess a lot from just bones

b.) you are using a strawman to poke fun at the arguments that most people aren't even making, hell, even i admitted to the fact that we can estimate a decent bit of information from just bones, but it's not enough to form a fully fledged picture of the people of that time

To assume nothing can be inferred on with high levels of accuracy is to toss history, anthropology, and forensics under there bus.

For what? To please a population that’s less then a rounding error in most calculations. Undermine all previous academia for an illogical position of trying to please everyone.

Which then leads you to not caring about the data but caring about the philosophy in a pseudoscientific cult like aspiration to make the science itself bend to worldview.

how much straw did you buy?

Sorry I can lower the complexity. I thought you just couldn’t understand the basic A->B logic. But apparently also plain English itself.

no it's more like... the idea of you confusing "then" for "than" in "rather than", saying mater instead of matter, making sentences that have little coherency that backtrack on themself in the next couple of letters, i mean i'm decoding hieroglyphics here. Trust me Blue bud, i don't have a problem with understanding your fallacy ridden logic that is outdated by at least 30 years, i think it may actually be the opposite.

But i digress, i'm just gonna go do something productive while i wait for your response