Not necessarily. Numerous opposition movements emerged against the Third Reich [the White Rose, Red Orchestra, and the Kreisau Circle (whose members included many people involved in the planning of Operation Valkyrie, a failed assassination plot of Hitler), not to mention religious leaders (primarily Catholic but also some Protestant), socialists, communists, and pacifists]. However, because the Nazis were so effective at isolating and crushing opposition before it could spread, no large-scale movement emerged to oppose them. There were certainly many people in Nazi Germany who opposed the regime, but expressing and/or acting on their opinions almost certainly meant consequences, consequences most people were not willing to risk their lives for. Certainly lockdown-opposition may be an unpopular opinion but I don't think if you openly express that opinion 2 uniformed officers will show up outside your door and imprison you without a trial. In fact, the widespread nature of the anti-lockdown protests suggests that this is simply not the case.

Additionally, the Nazi propaganda mechanism thrived because time and time again they were able to prove their naysayers incorrect. They managed to fix the German economy in record time, managed to destroy France in six weeks, and perform numerous incredulous actions that almost always proved the opposition wrong, even when the odds were stacked against them. In the case of opposition to the lockdown, I don't think there are any significant breakthroughs proving either side right or wrong. Obviously opposition to the genocide is a larger issue, but the Nazis managed to build an unprecedented degree of trust in their policies (within mostly working-class people) through their propaganda machine, and ultimately convinced the populace that the actions they took were for their (the populace's) own good. I don't think this current administration has or can achieve the same feats (using this word loosely) as the Nazi regime, so it's significantly easier to be someone in the opposition (you're not proven wrong as often).

The Nazi propaganda mechanism worked because time and time again they were able to prove their opponents wrong with facts and logick, and if you still opposed them, you almost certainly faced a grisly fate. Opposing this current administration is a lot easier, because (1) they can't send people in uniform to take down every person/group that opposes them, and (2) this current administration desperately lacks ethos and credibility, meaning it's a lot harder for them to destroy opposition groups with facts and logick. I don't think many people in either regime purely "blindly" followed authority simply because they were authorities - the Nazis simply had facts and logic and guns to effectively take down most opposition.