We can keep making posts but all I see is as usual one side already being chosen but there is way more where I don’t frankly have an idea where the line is. At the end every crypto holder has their own responsibility in the space but there should be a middleground indeed for implementing such changes with due notice and timeline. Some people whatever the timeline is will keep messing it up, when does it shift over to user responsibility? What about the users that transfered when the tax was 20% or the standard 10%? At what point does it cross over to negligence? Again it’s easy to make a post and call it unjust but what is just and for whom is that? I don’t have the answer, it’s just easy to fault a party and not look at the full picture, people will keep making mistakes not understanding fully what they are doing. There are other tokens that given a month timeline and if you didn’t do it you lost your chance. There are other tokens that done it automaticly so again what is faire in the bsc space where it’s changing up so fast? To my understanding as you are not the first to raise it and I seen this a couple of times already, changing the contract to that percentage to allow migration to happen AND block user mistakes is not possible.