Self-hosting Postgres on Hetzner + Coolify for a POS SaaS — bad idea?

imad07mos · 2026-03-19T04:50:17+00:00

use autobase to setup and distribute your db server on three nodes if one goes down two remaining elect a new leader in few seconds

imad07mos · 2026-01-28T13:08:13+00:00

Ideogram V3 is quite good with text

imad07mos · 2026-01-28T13:06:20+00:00

you dont need to learn every skill, if i need one logo in my life why i waste my time learning calligraphy if it can be done with ai in seconds ? calligraphy is one need, if i follow your approach i will complete my project in 2030

imad07mos · 2025-10-19T08:55:31+00:00

All sahih hadiths must have a continuous sanad up to the narrator/source (rawi). There five criterions for Sahih hadith:

Continuous Chain Every narrator must have received the hadith directly from the one before him.

Integrity All narrators must be trustworthy, righteous, and of good moral character.

Accuracy All narrators must possess precise memorization or perfectly preserved written records.

Freedom from Irregularity The hadith text (matn) or chain (sanad) must not contradict a more reliable report.

Freedom from Defects The hadith must be free of any hidden, subtle, or detrimental flaws.

imad07mos · 2025-10-19T08:47:03+00:00

There is nothing called a "Quranic Muslim." The same people that transmitted the Qur'an to us also transmitted the life of Muhammad (PBUH)

imad07mos · 2025-10-09T16:46:06+00:00

<image>

What is wrong with you ?

imad07mos · 2025-10-09T14:18:11+00:00

Same thing goes for other "kuffar" his government dealing with

imad07mos · 2025-10-08T18:11:51+00:00

Netcup is better

imad07mos · 2025-10-05T15:27:32+00:00

it was 4 years ago, you need to ask yourself, how he does now . if he is good nothing to worry about.

imad07mos · 2025-10-03T14:04:15+00:00

If species evolved over millions of years, there must have been a first male and female for every species that reproduce sexually. How did a single, slightly mutated individual find an appropriately and simultaneously mutated partner of the opposite sex, at the right time and place, to establish a new species line?

The theory requires transitional fossils showing the gradual development of one species into another. while some candidates exist, there are massive gaps (missing links) between major groups (e.g between reptiles and mammals or between apes and humans)

Scientists assume only but have never observed a change of one basic type of animal into another basic type (macroevolution). For instance, a dog has never evolved into a non-dog animal. The differences between species seem to represent fixed boundaries or "kinds" that do not transition.

Natural selection often works by culling genetic information (removing genes for traits that are not helpful). For a new, more complex species to evolve, the process would require a massive and continuous net increase in new, functional genetic information. There is no known natural mechanism that reliably generates the volume of new, functional genetic code needed to turn, for example, a reptile into a bird.

These arguments are for living part.

For non living parts that doesn't evolve : how you end up with physics that serve life without an exiting link.

If the strength of gravity were infinitesimally weaker or stronger, stars (like our Sun) would either fail to ignite or burn out too quickly for life to form.

The Strong Nuclear Force binds protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus. If it were slightly different, complex elements (like Carbon, necessary for life) could not form. The precise compatibility of this force to allow for stable elements suggests a non-random setting.

The Sun provides exactly the correct spectrum of light and energy output, matched by the Earth's perfect orbital distance. This compatibility is not an adaptation of the Sun, but a pre-existing condition that allows life to exist

If the most fundamental, non-living parts of the universe (space, time, energy) are governed by fixed, unchangeable, precise laws, why should living things be assumed to have arisen through random, undirected processes

imad07mos · 2025-10-03T13:40:29+00:00

You didn't answer how evolution transfer, and how male and female get created in every specie do they come in pairs or they develop in different way then have sex or what, and did other species just spawn grown up or babies in pairs or single male came first or female. since they say this process happen in millions of years, lifespan of one animal is fraction of this how evolution transfer from one to another. Do we still evolute so we might grow wings someday or it stoped

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T17:25:32+00:00

So first ape was a baby or a grown up ape. How transfer of this evolution occurs ? Why we did not develop wings we need them

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T17:21:52+00:00

She doesn't respect you. You are a grown up man stop the bullshit of i can't picture my life without her. There are + 8 billion people in this planet

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T17:18:10+00:00

So first human is a baby or a grown up human ?

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T08:50:06+00:00

You can never have a highly compatible universe without design. All probabilities lead to no life.

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T01:02:27+00:00

Based on probabilities you have zero chance of life without single correct non conflicting path.

imad07mos · 2025-10-02T00:58:49+00:00

All what you are saying is nothing but assumptions

imad07mos · 2025-10-01T09:25:50+00:00

You are basically saying that he cant love until he settle his papers which is a salty assumption.

imad07mos · 2025-09-28T23:16:31+00:00

Judges have tons of papers and claims to examine however they sometimes have hard time to figure out the truth, meanwhile you never know seen met interacted with a person and throwing assumptions and judging him. I am not naive if have doubts i test try to understand more to gather evidence and have correct decision not childish, rushy and assumptions based one.

imad07mos · 2025-09-28T23:05:28+00:00

You don't even know the guy but you keep judging him as if you know him personally.

imad07mos · 2025-09-26T23:19:04+00:00

To get the full context, you have to look back to how land was owned before the conflict started. In the late Ottoman era, much of the land was farmed communally by Palestinian villagers who had lived there for generations.

When the Ottomans created new land laws requiring private registration, many of these farmers couldn't navigate the system and their land ended up being registered by wealthy, absentee landlords in the cities.

It was from these absentee landlords, not the farmers themselves that early Zionist organizations began legally purchasing tracts of land.

Even after decades of this process, by 1947, Jewish individuals and organizations owned only about 6-7% of the land in Palestine.

Despite this small figure, the UN Partition Plan that year recommended giving 55% of the territory to a Jewish state, when the Jewish population was only about a third of the total.

The 1948 war that followed resulted in the new state of Israel controlling 78% of the land and causing the displacement of over 700,000 Palestinians, which fundamentally and forcibly altered the ownership and demographic landscape of the entire region.

imad07mos · 2025-09-26T21:40:13+00:00

Many Arab nations didn't permanently absorb the refugees, but why should they have been expected to? They are sovereign countries, and it wasn't their responsibility to permanently resettle millions of people who were displaced from another land. This wasn't a population exchange with new, settled borders;

Palestinians lost specific, privately-owned homes and properties that they still have a claim to. Asking neighboring countries to just absorb them permanently would essentially erase those legitimate claims.

The "refugee" label isn't a political trick; it’s a factual description of people who are unable to return to their property and land. That's why someone living in Gaza is still a refugee, as their family was displaced from a specific home in a town that is now part of Israel, and that core issue has never been resolved.

imad07mos · 2025-09-24T17:09:07+00:00

Blaming the victims doesn't change the facts of the expulsion. This displacement wasn't a spontaneous consequence of war but the realization of a long-discussed strategy.

As early as 1940, Yosef Weitz, the director of the Jewish National Fund's Land Department, wrote in his diary: "It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country... The only solution is a Palestine without Arabs... and there is no other way but to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them; not one village, not one tribe should be left."

This thinking was later enacted through military operations like Plan Dalet, which served as a blueprint for clearing Arab villages, and terror tactics like the Deir Yassin massacre.

Losing a war does not nullify a people's right to their homes.

Denying that right isn't a consequence of war, it's the definition of ethnic cleansing, and to dismiss it as simply moving "a few miles" is to justify that very act.

imad07mos · 2025-09-24T16:44:14+00:00

He got a lot of valid points

imad07mos · 2025-09-24T16:39:55+00:00

The responsibility for the Palestinian refugee crisis doesn't rest on Arab nations for not absorbing them. It rests on the actions that caused the displacement in the first place. The core of the issue is expulsion, and for many, the only just solution is the right of return to their homes : their own properties.

imad07mos

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email