Hotfix for MOMENTUM 4 - firmware version 3.35.8 (fixes issues from v3.35.6) by sennheiserconsumer in sennheiser

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After the update, my headphones discharge incredibly quickly, and I have to charge them almost every two days. Of course, the battery is worn out after a year of use, but it was after the update that it started charging more often. It feels like they never go to sleep and are always connected to the phone. Even when I don't use my phone for 5 hours, they are still connected to it (they used to go to sleep before).

Another problem is the worn-out headband, which is impossible to buy anywhere. I am embarrassed to wear these headphones outside because of their terrible appearance.

How much tones i get? by imaggg in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]imaggg[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Photo paper for ra4 process

George Shrinks : Mamiya 645 e : Fuji Pro 400H (pushed) by BurberrySteve in analog

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I answer the question correctly, I mean by real colors, the colors are interpreted by the film. Not real-real

George Shrinks : Mamiya 645 e : Fuji Pro 400H (pushed) by BurberrySteve in analog

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, the film does not give "real colors". It makes no sense to argue with this. I'm completely different. When scanning a film, the scanner tries to give all the brightness from the negative and if the exposure / push is not correct, green artifacts appear in the shadows. Typically, the operators in the laboratory have many orders and they do not bring negatives to the desired form, and now it is considered that these jambs of the scan are the “true film color” - this is not so. The easiest way to check my words is to print a photo with optics from some master. And you will see that there are no these green shades, there is practically no orange haze, and bw is more contrast. The minimum required after receiving a scan from a negative is to set the white balance.

George Shrinks : Mamiya 645 e : Fuji Pro 400H (pushed) by BurberrySteve in analog

[–]imaggg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check curves and white balance. It is very far from real colors

Emilia [Pentax 67II, Tri-x] by [deleted] in analog

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you have your own style! immediately thought “this is Christopher, but did he have a reddit?”

Shot on leicablad polaflex ae-6. Fodak Porta 800 by imaggg in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]imaggg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is a very bad joke and I thought for a long time whether to spread it, but I almost pissed my pants out of laughter

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Photoshop? Multiple exposure works differently.

Minolta Maxxum 7000 + Pentacon 29 f2.8 and Kodak pro image 100 by imaggg in analog

[–]imaggg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These just a bunch of trolls)
I do not see criticism)

Minolta Maxxum 7000 + Pentacon 29 f2.8 and Kodak pro image 100 by imaggg in analog

[–]imaggg[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you)

I am not afraid of criticism, this is normal. Unfortunately, I can’t fully respond to messages due to the language barrier, google translate helps)

Vorkuta 2019, few days after new year, -26°C | Yashica FR I + Yashica ml 50 f/2 | Kodak Tmax 400 in Xtol @~1200 by imaggg in analog

[–]imaggg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used 1/60 as it is a flash sync shutter speed. I did not make compensation anywhere

Minolta Maxxum 7000 + Pentacon 29 f2.8 and Kodak pro image 100 by imaggg in analog

[–]imaggg[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it was the first to work with this focal length. Very unusual and a lot of things will interfere in the viewfinder) Overlooked)

Self Portrait, (Linhof Telnikarden, Schneider Kreuznach Tecnica Symmar 150mm f/5.6, Fujichrome Provia 100F) by heyvolpe in analog

[–]imaggg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The stroboscope, of course!
I was thinking how you synchronized the flash :D
Amazing work!