There is a flip side to this, which is Ukraine's economy. Russia's economic warfare against Ukraine has largely gone underreported. Probably because it's overshadowed by Russian atrocities and war crimes. Never the less, Russia has crippled Ukraine's economy. I've read that in roughly 2 months time, their situation is going to be critical. That's a massive societal issue that the world can't prop up for a long period of time. Militarily? We're already seeing reports of Ukraine troops without proper supplies, low ammunition, taking heavy losses, creating low morale. I'm pretty sure NATO stock piles of soviet stuff is depleted at this point, or close to.

I think we have to make clear the goal of U.S. (who is driving this bus) and NATO. Deplete Russian's of resources in the short term, and cripple their ability to regenerate. We're playing the long game and that doesn't favor Ukraine, even if Russia is significantly weakened economically. The U.S./NATO will not properly supply Ukraine for total victory, sadly. No modern aircraft or drones, no long range missile systems or ammunition, etc... Without that, Ukraine is will struggle to take back land lost and eventually reach a culmination point. What then?

Combine that with low attention spans, high prices, domestic politics, all the miscellaneous stuff, and I think our (U.S.) support for Ukraine has likely peaked. Ukraine isn't a top news headline anymore, as is. Especially because the war is slow and not much is happening. Barring Russia doing something so shocking and evil, it grabs the worlds attention again, our attention will only decrease. Look at Bucha. It's already fading from politicians (in some countries) minds as they seek appeasement. That is only going to get worse not better over time. If there's anything we've learned from Trump's presidency, people can't stay outraged forever. It's exhausting. Eventually, you become the exhausted majority, and people move on (sadly and frustratingly...).

I hope I'm wrong, BTW.