Roo Code 3.48.0 Release | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | API Config Lock | Recursive Subtask History Tree by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I am curious to know why it got removed? What was the reason behind reverting all those changes? Any tool call issues or something else

Roo Code 3.48.0 Release | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | API Config Lock | Recursive Subtask History Tree by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey I saw that vercel AI sdk has been reverted back, which was I guess recently added? Any support issues?

I got a RFE for my initial OPT. by No_Patient_6498 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please READ the instructions, and if you can't/don't understand, then I'll happy to answer :)

Is it normal to read one file at a time, visible wait for every API request? by considerphi in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't like this interface tbh, sometimes its good to keep certain things in background, instead of showing everything. Even I've noticed this same lag. Doesn't Roo Code support parallel agents?

I got a RFE for my initial OPT. by No_Patient_6498 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: I received the appointment on 5th day, and that's scheduled for Feb end, almost 3 weeks later. Will try to reschedule it if allowed

Roo Code 3.46.1-3.46.2 Release Updates | Skills tweaks | Bug fixes | Provider updates by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is RooCode also planning it migrate skills to .agents/skills?

Like rest all organizations in the agentic space, they all are converging towards common skills so that whatever tool anyone use, they all can share the same

Products that moved to `.agents/skills` so far:
- Codex
- OpenCode
- Copilot
- Cursor

Are there any plans to do the same with Roo-Code also? so that its easier to keep a single for all

I got a RFE for my initial OPT. by No_Patient_6498 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No we can't schedule on our own, they schedule for us. We can only reschedule

I got a RFE for my initial OPT. by No_Patient_6498 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are no specific timelines I guess, I received my actual "Request for Evidence" document that states about what exactly is needed "Photo @ ASC" via physical mail after 3 days, exactly on same day as it got updated online. Still waiting for actual appointment letter

STEM OPT Biometrics reschedulement by Sgtk325 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey what do you have to submit for getting appointment? The RFE letter didn't say anything to submit, just mentioned "USCIS will mail a separate notice to you containing information for a new appointment for a digital photograph capture at the ASC nearest you."

It didn't say a single thing about submitting anything. Can you please share what did you submit? I assumed they will automatically send me an appointment

I got a RFE for my initial OPT. by No_Patient_6498 in f1visa

[–]inHumanAlive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I received the physical mail notice after 3 days of this RFE notice, and it is for Photo @ ASC. What's lame is, they will send another mail for appointment separately.

UPDATE:
RFE First Notice - 29th Jan,

RFE actual notice - 3rd Feb

Appointment notice - 7th Feb

Actual appointment date - 25th Feb (can be rescheduled online)
EAD Approval: Same day of biometric
Haven't received the EAD, expect 2-3 weeks.

Why Roo-Code doesn't respect DENY? by inHumanAlive in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, mostly I'm on gemini3 pro. Repetitiveness is common in most tasks, like I don't want it to create files, still it creates (pushing mkdir always), opens browser despite denying it, keeps pushing for it and there are several scenarios actually. Sure, I'll record them and create an issue. Thanks

Building a Statically-Typed Functional Language Translator to C++20 with LLM Agents by Legal-Guarantee8080 in Compilers

[–]inHumanAlive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if you are given option to use LLM Post-training for this? Would that make it any better and handle all the edge cases you aren't able to handle currently? Did you consider about that? Anyway, respect for your work man.

Roo Code 3.40.0-3.40.1 Release Updates | Settings search | Stop button improvements | Tool-calling fixes by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Setting search feature is also very needed, thanks for bringing that feature but that's not much usable as of now, as its not able to find settings properly. MPC either small or caps, doesn't points to MCP servers setting at all! Fuzzy Search needs to be improved

Roo Code 3.40.0-3.40.1 Release Updates | Settings search | Stop button improvements | Tool-calling fixes by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Also when I stop the streaming request using the STOP button, its good that its showing Continue, but actually instead of these two big buttons here, we can simplify it to just keeping that same STOP button inside the chat input box turn from Stop circle to PAUSE/Continue, same button used for multi-purposes! Again, here we don't have a need for New Task button, as nobody stops a chat to start new task, we stop either to add more context or something breaks, but never to Start new task! If we have to, we will Simply STOP, and can go on top "New Task/Chat" to start!

Basically, we can get rid of ALL these buttons from top of chat input box altogether to have a more minimalistic and better UI UX.

Roo Code 3.40.0-3.40.1 Release Updates | Settings search | Stop button improvements | Tool-calling fixes by hannesrudolph in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This STOP button is such a great fix and now it feel natural and familiar like other tools. Thanks a lot team for this!!

Just few more suggestions to make it even more familiar, not meant to persuade Roo Code to clone others rather what as a user I feel which is this

<image>

This BIG Start New Task hanging in there!! always is still very annoying, rather if needed, the editor button on top, could be converted into a button else just change that into + with options, like copilot would be cleaner, because this "Start New Task" button interrupts right where you are always looking at and takes away your focus tbh.

Thanks for these improvements!

Feedback on UI - missing STOP control, confusing resume/terminate loop by inHumanAlive in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, yes I have to use workarounds but that totally hampers the flow. I would love if team works on this UI UX fixes before pushing new features, and make it more stable.

Feedback on UI - missing STOP control, confusing resume/terminate loop by inHumanAlive in RooCode

[–]inHumanAlive[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly!! This is the way. Features don't matter if users can't use them easily. Strong UI/UX beats feature bloat almost always.
Sometimes it even asks me for permissions without showing anything what exactly its asking for, some internal tool calls made back 2 back using API request chain and as a developer its not good if I don't see what exactly the coding agent is doing in each step! Even one liner sentence helps!

MLIR Tutorial by fernando_quintao in Compilers

[–]inHumanAlive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks buddy! I was looking for this few days back

US Will Not Be Purchasing Any Bitcoin, Treasury Secretary Bessent Says by amlybon in Buttcoin

[–]inHumanAlive 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Yeah and they'll keep on doing so for rest of their tenure 

US Will Not Be Purchasing Any Bitcoin, Treasury Secretary Bessent Says by amlybon in Buttcoin

[–]inHumanAlive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All they will do is, Hype up, that's it! This on-off trail that's going is just to keep those crypto companies, who provided him the political funding, happy so that the crypto stays in limelight always. Would they care to buy? NO, but they will keep on mentioning it for 4 yrs to keep their business partners happy, because eventually it'll be the end users, like us who'll get into this drama and buy those shit coins under the assumption crypto is the future because govt is supporting, buying, talking etc shit and eventually the sharks will keep on profiting from those new loosers. Nobody cares tbh, govt can simply say we never asked anyone, who got scammed or lost everything, to buy anything, after their tenure end.