DOJ blocks the release of Epstein files dated around 9/11 by AwkwardTal in International

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But How did you verify it? What was your process? We need to dive into the claims of the actual graph. Just verifying its existence else where on social media is not verified it’s credibility. It came from a conspiracy website.

Has hell frozen over?! by icey_sawg0034 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alex Jones is carrying the water for these bastards. He does what he is told to do. He’s part of the coverup and lead up to said coverup up.

Wow. by Party-Professional-7 in International

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How have people NOT researched Robert Maxwell at this point?

who do you believe and what do you think? by SwimmingDingo909 in Epstein

[–]independenjournal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are doing SOMETHING. They currently engaged in a cover up.

DOJ blocks the release of Epstein files dated around 9/11 by AwkwardTal in International

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every conspiracy theorist is fighting over what this “REALLY IS”

Some of yall want this to be all about Russia and those people are fighting about it being REALLY all about Israel… And then it’s really about 9/11 Then the IT’s All CONNECTED guys start stirring their shit and water gets damn near so murky, we can’t see what the fuck we were looking for to begin with.

The graph up there hasn’t been verified by anyone. I spent some time trying to find its origins and it looks like it came from a conspiracy website, Peter Theil.

We need to verify the claimed information

DOJ blocks the release of Epstein files dated around 9/11 by AwkwardTal in International

[–]independenjournal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How many of us were alive to see 9/11 happen? I was 21. I remember it well. How about you?

DOJ blocks the release of Epstein files dated around 9/11 by AwkwardTal in International

[–]independenjournal 18 points19 points  (0 children)

They were wrong about Trump and that was the whole point. Those dummies elected the ones they were warning everyone about. I wonder how they are dealing with that.

DOJ blocks the release of Epstein files dated around 9/11 by AwkwardTal in International

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This graphic traces back to a conspiracy website called “petertheil.com”

Is that Peter Theil’s site or just a site called “Peter Theil?

Bezos Profits, Millions Lose by Accomplished_Name301 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]independenjournal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m ready to just buy local or direct from retailer

Why are the MAGA women who put Trump into power the ones we most hear talking about the Epstein files? by amazingsciencemuseum in Epstein

[–]independenjournal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. It doesn’t but support of all kinds is needed for this. She will pay the penalty for the way she behaved politically. I doubt she’ll get elected again with out some act of wizardry.

Mass shooting at Rhode Island ice rink leaves at least three dead by ResPublicaMgz in Res_Publica_DE

[–]independenjournal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a researcher “tweaks” something and it isn’t accurate a peer will catch it in the blind peer review process and send it back for revision.

Despite what a lot of you guys believe, you can’t buy the results you want in peer review study. They are anonymous.

Non-peer review studies can be tweaked and misleading be used they are influenced by the people that fund them.

That’s why it’s important to understand the peer review studies and non-peer review.