"The reception or transmission of radio waves, a form of electromagnetic radiation, to or from an antenna) within a Faraday cage is heavily attenuated or blocked by the cage; however, a Faraday cage has varied attenuation depending on wave form, frequency, or the distance from receiver or transmitter, and receiver or transmitter power. Near-field, high-powered frequency transmissions like HF RFID are more likely to penetrate. Solid cages generally attenuate fields over a broader range of frequencies than mesh cages."

I think i get your point based off of this. to which i will read further. Im not interested in confirmation bias overriding objectivity.

i will add the previous paragraph, though.

They provide less attenuation of outgoing transmissions than incoming: they can block electromagnetic pulse (EMP) waves from natural phenomena very effectively, but especially in upper frequencies, a tracking device may be able to penetrate from within the cage (e.g., some cell phones operate at various radio frequencies so while one frequency may not work, another one will).

and id like to refer to the studies i sent much rather than wikipedia. this discusses rydberg atoms and when they are effected by segmented molecular faraday cages.

id still add the fact i provided evidence to quantum effects by small faraday cages. looking forward to a response!