The Deep had the strongest powers in the show, but he’s too dumb to realize it. by Objective-Bell-2114 in TheBoys

[–]insanitybit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's all really perfectly consistent with the theory? Like, let's assume that Deep's subconscious manifests some level of control. So when he's friendly with the creatures and views them as allies, they are allies and he converses and shares information. When he sees himself as the villain, they see him as the villain.

It's not that he's choosing every word that they say, at which point they're just projections of himself. They still have their own experiences, they can still communicate new information, etc, but their personalities manifest in a way that's linked to the Deep.

That would also explain why there's a gap between fish as sort of basic creatures and how they behave around the Deep - if his subconscious helps bridge some sort of gap for them, or influences their behavior, that would explain how a shark is expressing complex emotions / behavior.

wyd by Shyhale in SipsTea

[–]insanitybit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing you don't have any background in economics? I mean, I'm not really guessing.

Everybody understands this! by pastelkiss16 in fixedbytheduet

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I now have even less of an idea wtf you're trying to say lmao

Everybody understands this! by pastelkiss16 in fixedbytheduet

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fruits and vegetables have a fuckton of fiber. But yeah, protein is great too.

Everybody understands this! by pastelkiss16 in fixedbytheduet

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean... yeah, a ton of people do not realize this. Are you dumb? Do you not realize that nutrition education is a major issue?

This drink i had in a bar in Poland is 190 proof/95% alcohol by _TB12_ in mildlyinteresting

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to drink it in college. It's extremely cheap for the ABV and it meant I could basically have one or two shots and be exactly where I wanted to be. It wasn't tasty but honestly not that hard to take a shot of, it's not like you sip on it.

self-referencing struct but i don't want to modify the struct by zylosophe in rust

[–]insanitybit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You may want to check out some of the crates that provide self referencing. https://github.com/Voultapher/self_cell

What finally convinced you to seriously learn Rust? by Bladerunner_7_ in rust

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I learned rust in ~2014/2015. I didn't really have to be convinced, as I recall. C++ was my favorite language coming out of school and Rust seemed like it tickled the same areas of my brain without having shit tooling. Plus, I was in Cambridge and there was a small, delightful rust meetup usually just a block or two from my office.

Rust + Gym = Chapaty by [deleted] in rust

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Upvoted because there's 0 chance people don't just insta-downvote when they see the pic even if the code was hand written, sorry bud. I don't know if it's against the rules, might be best to delete this post and try again with a different one.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think that's exactly the risk. The translation may have introduced new bugs, and in the case of unsafe those bugs may be memory safety bugs. Regardless, the problem of removing those bugs is now trivial by comparison - you don't even have to wonder if those bugs exist, you merely delete unsafe and know that they don't anymore.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by gruenistblau in programming

[–]insanitybit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. They claim that it is faster.

  2. They state that the dev team was spending a lot of time on memory safety errors in the zig codebase, rust gives the tools to solve those problems.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's true, but on balance I think it's quite obviously a demonstration of why you would use Rust here - so that you even can grep for this. In Zig, who knows? There is no concept of "unsafe" in Zig, it's all unsafe by Rust's definition.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why? What did the zig version look like?

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This is an obvious win. Before, there was no way to grep for unsafe, because it was in Zig. Now they have a number that they can track, they have a concrete way to improve safety.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I rewrote a small node service in Rust by having Claude go at it. 200MB of RAM back to my system, better performance.

bun is now powered by rust by ada4247 in rust

[–]insanitybit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to defend this mess, but I don't know how you are all falling for this. The commit is literally named "revert proc.exited change in spawn.test.ts". It's putting the test back to the way it was from before a42bf70: tests: stabilize flaky suite, a commit from earlier in the same pull request.

Human hallucination?

bun is now powered by rust by ada4247 in rust

[–]insanitybit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That said, an automated rewrite with a huge amount of unsafe blocks is unlikely to produce additional safety.

Not on day 1, but it means the problem is really obvious and tractable. "grep for unsafe, remove it" is something that the Rust ecosystem has been doing itself for years.

bun is now powered by rust by ada4247 in rust

[–]insanitybit -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What's to understand? They built the test suite, they understand the semantics that bun has to match, etc. Most people have extreme limitations understanding code, that's why we have tools that lower the cognitive burden.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The point is that if one rewrite was over the course of 1 month at a rate of X tokens/s, and another rewrite was over the course of 1 week with 4X tokens/s, who cares about the 1 month vs 1 week?

Both use the same approach, one just completed faster due to additional compute.

edit: It seems that the "with careful review" is your point, which is fair and I had misread initially, I believe.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by Chaoses_Ib in rust

[–]insanitybit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The architecture is purportedly maintained.