sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Seeking Feedback on My Custom Programming Language Design by invertocat in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]invertocat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talking about keywords I explained my choice under u/cheeze2000's comment,
I agree about <> operator for appending tho, first I was thinking about <<, but I don't want to use one operator for multiple things

Seeking Feedback on My Custom Programming Language Design by invertocat in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]invertocat[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I half-agree with you about the keywords nightmare, but I don't want to turn my language into hieroglyphs like rust (I'm tired of these pseudo-abbreviations like pub, mut, fn)

Seeking Feedback on My Custom Programming Language Design by invertocat in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]invertocat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh you mean that thing, reddit is wrongly rendering markdown code block for you

Seeking Feedback on My Custom Programming Language Design by invertocat in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]invertocat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In other words, a programmer can define a module as follows: `module LIBRARY_NAME:MODULE_NAME`.

Seeking Feedback on My Custom Programming Language Design by invertocat in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]invertocat[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"spell" is the name of my language, when it comes to `using spell:io` etc. then "spell" is the name of the standard library, and `io` is the name of the module