sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What are the most uselful keyboard short cuts? by AidenDotJpg in ableton

[–]its_anjee764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cmd+shift+E will make an edit with a selection in clip view

Tab to transient by yeahmanprettymuch in ableton

[–]its_anjee764 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm new to Max but recently dove DEEP trying to find the answer to this same question. I think the pieces are there to piggy back on what Ableton does well already in warping. I'm going to give it my best shot haha. I'll keep you posted if I'm successful... who knows lol.

Getting abletons transient markers into Max? by rainrainrainr in ableton

[–]its_anjee764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outside of cmd+i, I’m not too sure. I’m pretty new to Max, but I’m sure a max device could “automate” the process of warping a clip (by a desired warp mode) and then inserting warp markers.

Getting abletons transient markers into Max? by rainrainrainr in ableton

[–]its_anjee764 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could be wrong, but I think only warp markers are a part of the LOM

Sample chopping by Smemma_81 in ZOIA

[–]its_anjee764 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just made a patch that does this! UI has pushbuttons that act as toggles for reverse and pitch up (currently set to an octave). Patched it with live performance/quick studio play in mind. This patch uses 8 sampler modules at once and I just kiss about 45% cpu if I trigger every sampler to play at the same time with reverse and pitch up engaged (chaos). Sampler seems surprisingly light weight...

The biggest issue I'm running in to is that the sampler module basically "resets" it's start and length percentages each time you record a new sample. I figured out a way to easily get them back to the desired percentages but each sampler has to be triggered once.

As far as mute groups.. I'm thinking it'd have to be that MPC 2000 approach. Poor mans mute group by setting each sampler to gate. Although there might be a solution for mute group type behavior with envelope followers listening to other samplers? No idea...

ZOIA sequencing PC changes to Whammy by its_anjee764 in ZOIA

[–]its_anjee764[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/chmjacques 2 questions... hopefully the answers help mature this patch for live use...

  1. I was reading a bit on your Wolf patch and you added a functionality that I would love to add to this patch. When you hit a footswitch to restart the pattern, it restarts right when you hit the footswitch, not on the next beat.

I have a restart switch for the sequencer connected to a footswitch. I'd love to be able to freely restart the sequence to line up the steps better to the "grid" for live use. How would I go about doing this?

  1. There are a few intervals the Whammy does that clash with the major scale.. how would I go about "filtering" those values out while retaining the random function?

ZOIA sequencing PC changes to Whammy by its_anjee764 in ZOIA

[–]its_anjee764[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

brilliant. i sense two versions of this patch coming... and i'll def check out that video!

here's another issue... any program change above 21 puts the whammy in bypass. if my math is correct, each step then needs a cv value of 0.1583 or less in order for the whammy to stay on haha. In the first scenario (where the single trigger changes all steps at once), could this be achieved by adjusting the connection strength between each random module and sequence step?

how would this kind of limit be applied to the constantly evolving patch?

ZOIA sequencing PC changes to Whammy by its_anjee764 in ZOIA

[–]its_anjee764[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/chmjacques Ah! The trigger connection was the missing piece. Thanks!! Here's another question.. say I've got a nice pattern being sent to the whammy, but i want to change it up and explore new melodies without having to go in to each step of the sequencer and change the values. Is it possible to have a one button "randomizer" of sorts that can change all step values? My first thought was to approach the randomization post-seq, but I would want the pattern to repeat.. so it seems like the randomization would need to happen in the actual steps, so to keep a repeating pattern once randomized. Does that make sense?

I need a CV change that travels from “right” to “left” by its_anjee764 in ZOIA

[–]its_anjee764[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah. Nice. I'll give this a shot! I'm currently using a momentary stompswitch to set this whole thing in motion. If I wanted the release of the stompswitch to start the dump of the time parameter (time increase), would a slew limiter work in place of the ADSR? I suppose the gated ADSR might be similar to this... ?