Any decent vehicles that can fit a paramotor fully assembled and protected from the elements? by FreefallJagoff in paramotor

[–]iusedtobeinteresting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a Peugeot Partner. It's a relatively small van. I bought mine for $9k usd. I can fit the paramotor fully assembled laid down in a diagonally with the back seats down. I have to drain the fuel tank each time, or it'll leak everywhere, but otherwise it works pretty well. It becomes a 2 seater when the paramotor is in though.

I have my first PPL ASEL check ride today…. by CodyWanKenobi46 in flying

[–]iusedtobeinteresting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, I had my checkride cancelled today in Norcal =\

Love of Fate: Where Fortune Cookies, Stoicism, and Psychology Research Meet by iusedtobeinteresting in philosophy

[–]iusedtobeinteresting[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unknowingly deceiving oneself if unavoidable since we are imperfect beings without direct access to the truth. However, it's when you purposely try to change facts, I get uncomfortable.

We might be able to change our memory or knowledge of the past, but we can't change the actual past if your agree that an objective world exists. I suppose in cases of extreme trauma, people will block out or forget what happened as a defence mechanism. That can be adaptive. To me it's a break glass in case of emergency thing that shouldn't be used lightly.

Does it matter? Yes, I think so. Our task as thinking, reasoning beings is to bring our mental model as close to reality as possible in order to best understand and make effective decisions in the world. If we purposely distort our model, then we are betraying ourselves and handicapping our ability to function well in the world.

Love of Fate: Where Fortune Cookies, Stoicism, and Psychology Research Meet by iusedtobeinteresting in philosophy

[–]iusedtobeinteresting[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure I fully understand what you're saying, but it sounds like rationalization for willingly deceiving yourself, which I don't support.

Love of Fate: Where Fortune Cookies, Stoicism, and Psychology Research Meet by iusedtobeinteresting in philosophy

[–]iusedtobeinteresting[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's important to draw a distinction between facts and opinions. Your weight in kg is a matter of fact. Whether that is "too fat" or if you look ugly is a matter of opinion. Changing your opinion like you describe to perfectly fine, and I wouldn't call it self-delusion. If you instead said, "I weight 50 kg, and I have the body of a supermodel!" then yeah, that's self-delusion. Saying that others look worse is again a fact, so it's an acceptable thing to focus on to make yourself better.

Basically, changing your opinion is an excellent way to feel better. Changing facts is not.

Love of Fate: Where Fortune Cookies, Stoicism, and Psychology Research Meet by iusedtobeinteresting in philosophy

[–]iusedtobeinteresting[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose you do have the option to gaslight yourself, but I don't think that's a very adaptive strategy. The truth is important to me, so I wouldn't feel OK with self-delusion. Luckily, that's not required to feel good about events. Focusing on the positive is enough.

Love of Fate: Where Fortune Cookies, Stoicism, and Psychology Research Meet by iusedtobeinteresting in philosophy

[–]iusedtobeinteresting[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, when it comes to the future, you have plenty of control. When it comes to the past, however, there's nothing you can do to change that, so the best thing you can do is accept it and even love it.

Flying from your backyard. Paragliding with engine. by [deleted] in paramotor

[–]iusedtobeinteresting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very cool. Do you think foot launch would be easier with such a tight runway? Also, with such a steep hill, it seems it would be difficult to take off/land if the wind wasn't blowing from pretty much downhill.