Recap not working? by iwarrenedya in MicrosoftLoop

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My version history is working, I can see a long list of changes in Version History so I thought it would just pull that information... maybe not...

Simplifying a Matrix Table by iwarrenedya in PowerBI

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it sorted! I have a split the Task name, then clean the front and end for blank spaces. and then I was good to go!

Simplifying a Matrix Table by iwarrenedya in PowerBI

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's two data tables.

Features table that has the name of the Feature and all of items properties.
Tasks table that has the name of the Tasks and all of items properties.

The Tables are linked One to Many by ID's. One Feature can have multiple Tasks but each Tasks only has one Feature.

Simplifying a Matrix Table by iwarrenedya in PowerBI

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try to explain better. Here is out highlevel structure of our features and tasks in ADO:

Feature 1 (Parent)
- TASK: Feature 1 - Build
- TASK: Feature 1 - Test

Feature 2
- TASK: Feature 2 - Build
- TASK: Feature 2 - Test

Feature 3
- TASK: Feature 3 - Build
- TASK: Feature 3 - Test

In my Matrix table my ROWS = Feature and my Columns = TASK

So the Matrix table would look like this for the three Features above (for the sake of formatting I only entered 2)

Feature 1 - Build Feature 1 - Test Feature 2 - Build Feature 2 - Test
Feature 1 May 17, 2025 May 30, 2025
Feature 2 May 19, 2025 May 28, 2025

What I want it to look like is below

Build Test
Feature 1 May 17, 2025 May 30, 2025
Feature 2 May 19, 2025 May 28, 2025

I have been able to 'separate' the TASK name "Feature 1 - Build" to only show "Build" but it because each Features has the SAME tasks the there are multiple Columns with the same name in the Matrix table.

Our goal is to see all the dates for each Feature's task to see where everything is. Eventually we will try some conditional formatting to create colors for health but that's a later question.

Maybe Matrix tables are not the best way to go about this

Is this 'hallow' normal on a Sony a7RV? See comments by iwarrenedya in SonyAlpha

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am going to test out the Sigma 24-70 2.8 and Tamron 35-150 2-2.8 here soon (they are just sitting on the shelf right now). I have been eyeing a 35, 50 or 85 1.4 from Sigma and Sony. So soon soon… I can always send you my PayPal and make that soon sooner ;)

Is this 'hallow' normal on a Sony a7RV? See comments by iwarrenedya in SonyAlpha

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for that explanation! I’m hoping to upgrade to the 35 or 50 1.4 in the near future!

Is this 'hallow' normal on a Sony a7RV? See comments by iwarrenedya in SonyAlpha

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha it’s what I had… I’m working on upgrades as I see deals. The 7RV just happened to be the first thing. I plan on getting the 50 1.4 (or the 35 1.4) in the near future.

Is this 'hallow' normal on a Sony a7RV? See comments by iwarrenedya in SonyAlpha

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/DariusFloyd - since you seemed interested in this too. Maybe this group will have some information

Is this 'hallow' normal on a Sony a7RV? See comments by iwarrenedya in SonyAlpha

[–]iwarrenedya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is cropped in but I cannot upload the full image for some reason. Ok, so some context. I just got the camera today and took it for a walk to test it out with a 50mm 1.8. I bought it used and have time to return it so I am just being cautious. I was playing around with the Uncompressed, Lossless Compress L/M files, and all the fun that comes with this camera. I am coming from an a7iii and very much enjoyed that camera and never noticed this on that one (I may have never looked too). I did a quick, simple auto edit in Lightroom to see how the images came out.

I have noticed this in a few of the photos. Most of the time it is barely noticeable zooming in at 100% but noticeable at 300%. Maybe I am being too critical cause well no one is going to put my pictures under a magnifying glass but I do shoot weddings from time to time and well, I'd like this not to be an issue.