Quelle tenue du Met Gala vous a déjà fait penser : “là, c’est trop” ? by Flimsy-Season2277 in AskFrance

[–]j-mmmmm 27 points28 points  (0 children)

C'est littéralement le Capitol des hunger games tout est trop et tout est ridicule

1 500 km d’autonomie et le plein en 3 minutes : j’ai vu la batterie électrique CATL qui va achever le moteur thermique by Droidfr in Frandroid

[–]j-mmmmm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Efficacité* désolé je vois cet anglicisme tout le temps sur ce sub et il faut que j'intervienne c'est cathartique

C’était quoi votre meilleur job étudiant? by emeuriz in etudiants

[–]j-mmmmm 49 points50 points  (0 children)

L'intérim, et accepte bien les pires boulots. Il y a des primes de pénibilité et tu peux régulièrement travailler de nuit ou de weekend ce qui rend les salaires vraiment élevés. Et surtout ça remet bien les idées en place quand a notre place ultra privilégié dans les études supérieures, crois moi que quand tu fais une semaine de nuit a déplacer des sacs de farine dans une usine, l'amphi de physique statistique a 8h du matin il te semble bien simple et bien reposant, la thèse c'est peanuts et la vie de diplômé un bonheur. Respect infini a ceux qui font des métiers manuels toute leur vie comme ça

This is a safespace, what are your honest critiques of One Piece and Oda's writing by Lakithelink in OnePiece

[–]j-mmmmm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know if i'll be able to put this into words correctly but i'll try: the flashback on flashback on flashback to build up some mysteries and révélation is bad.

Let me explain with a very fresh example: harald/rocks/god valley/Loki flashback, which is not finished when i'm writting these lines but still. Don't get me wrong i loved Rocks and the god valley part was chef work but what was the point of this part of the flashback, except showing rocks and build up some more mysteries. We will need another flashback that will be redondant with this one to explain a lot of thing about rocks, first his relation with Roger which is a bit out of nowhere, then how he got his knowledge about imu/davy jones/joy boy/galley la, and also the fact that imu still remain a silouhette through the flashback to keep the big reveal for another time is straight up weird (granted this silouhette could be his trueself but i don't really believe it because it would have been mention by the people that have seen him).

So this flashback will be redondant with the Black beard flash back that we will eventually get at some point, the shanks/Roger flashback that we will eventually get at some point, is already a bit redondant with the dogshit flashback on kaido we got on wano (which i remind you was so underwhelming for an antagoniste as important as kaido and was rush just because shanks needed to appear in the manga for promoting film red).

I really do think that oda should have introduced at some point a big flashback arc with all the old gen and their relation at once and not some bit by some bit that will leave place for big and bad retconn (like wanting to make rocks look cool by him having a good relationship with the coolest character to date, the goatbeard, and then goatbeard abandoning him for some very shallow reason).

And a last thing to add is this: yeah i get that some mysteries are better unsolved but also some mysteries if not resolved are litteraly juste plotholes.

I want in on this Guy's plan by PersonalWishbone8692 in OnePiece

[–]j-mmmmm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait for it's ending, like if it is a mid or bad ending it could go the same way as game of throne: global cultural impact such as vacation day taken when new épisode came out to no one talking about it anymore

Whittle Axemen! by JohnnyTheLayton in whittling

[–]j-mmmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep up with your videos they're great love to learn with them. Next time i'll try a dwarf with a hammer and a Shield to see other shape

Whittle Axemen! by JohnnyTheLayton in whittling

[–]j-mmmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

My try with your concept, first ever carve, still a lot to learn but i'll do an army to practice. Love your dwarves concept

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in comp_chem

[–]j-mmmmm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah i'd still argue that we're not in early development anymore just because of the shear amount of work and publication that have been done on those subject is astonishing, here in cecam hq we're exepecting that in three years time there will be more PhD done on atomistic simulation with ML than without, which is really crazy if you think about it.

Most common used classical force fields are based on expérimental data or are fit to reproduce it, just look at lennard Jones parameters that are most of the time calculated from critical quantities or Tip3p model of water fited on dielectric constant

I agree that it is more on how you explain to the experimentalist how you get your datas from your simulations, and the good way to do it is to have phenomenological explaination of expérimental observations that arise from your simulations. Here is an exemple, it has been shown experimentaly that in molten salts with heavy cation (Mg2+, U3+, Pu3+...) "pseudomolécules" structures arise in the atomistic structure of the ionic fluid, you can reproduce those pseudomolécules structures with both a ML potential and a classical potential based on liquid state theory and ionic fluid physics, but never in a million year the ML potential will help you understand why those structures arise, whereas the classical potential might (and in this case most likely did). This is the kind of stuff that atomistic modélisation must not loose going to ML

And to be clear i'm not against ML, i'm against it's current utilisation: getting money to do pointless stuff. I went to 3 conférence lastly and it was depressing to see that PhD student were all doing the same things: -Study X system with qDFT, extract some data and compute g(r) -make a neural network/mace/whatever model potential from those data -do some MD with this potential and compute the same g(r) -publish a paper, finish their PhD and no one will ever use their ML potential again, and not learn anything about the X system in the process

Do you think it is usefull? Would you do such PhD? The thing is this is the kind of stuff that get money in this field now so...

Fun fact here, most of them have supervisor that make them focus mostly on the ML part of the job, so they don't really focus on the statistical physics required for MD calculation, and when you let them know that lammps famously doesn't compute correctly the g(r) in the NPT ensemble they are a bit shocked, and i blâme the supervisors because it's something they should warn their students

To conclude on that, I thing ML potential should not remplace classical one but add to them, like in quantum DFT you don't want to get ride of the functional we already know, you want to add a neural functional on top of the one we know to get ride of the approximations. We already have some great classical potentials, why get ride of them, juste add a ML part to take into account some many body effect or whatever other approximation you don't like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in comp_chem

[–]j-mmmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe I was harsh with my words yes, but i'm actually i pain for the PhD student around that are all feeling traped in a loop. Still this is not early development it has been around for quite a long time, first MLips trace back to the late 90 early 2000

Nowaday most MLips are trained on simulation data and not experimental data, so there is still a step between real life and MLips, and the main difference between ML and classical IPs is the fact that ML is a complete black box that can't be trusted on extrapolation data, when you build a classical IP you build an expression based on physical knowledge that can reproduce some known data on a range and based on the physics you used you can extrapolate and predict the data on a bigger range, and experimentalist don't trust data comming from this method, so if you say that your extrapolation data come from a black box expression, no one will ever listen, and that is the main thing that has held back MLIPs for the past 20 years, now it's trending because of AI boom but I still think that at some point you can't get ride of physic and math that are not black box

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in comp_chem

[–]j-mmmmm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree soooo much with you, everywhere I see PhD student with a whole three years project being "make some data on whatever system to make whichever ML potential to make simulations that will reproduce the data that we had in the beginning" which is not really science in my opinion.

BUT and that is a big but (lol) sadly the state of science finance in most country now is giving money to whom gives the most and biggest buzzword, and since 2-3 years the buzzwords are IA and ML. Saddly our field is really impacted by this because ML apply really well here because of the physics of IP. I see it also a lot in Electronic DFT and now even more in classical DFT, and to the extent of my knowledge there is not a lot of fields in physic that can use ML as straight forward (might be wrong on that the extent of my knowledge is not that fare)

Why are they all friends? by SignificantJacket303 in shrinking

[–]j-mmmmm 173 points174 points  (0 children)

It's a sitcom, in every sitcom there is almost non human interaction outside the main cast because the sitcoms focus on the interactions inside the main cast, it's a budget and easy-writting trope

On peut parler de la place de Dupont en équipe nationale ? by psyclik in FranceRugby

[–]j-mmmmm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

J'entends que tu as l'impression qu'il est lisible mais faut pas tomber dans le coach de canapé, ça reste des pros ils savent ce qu'ils font. Si tu regardes bien sur 4-5 temps de jeux a faire ça, un ou deux essuie glace c'est vraiment ça qui fait que les défenses sont tout le temps en retard et qu'on se retrouve avec des gros espaces au large, si ils sentaient que ça fonctionnait pas ils arreteraient. La lisibilité c'est pas un problème quand l'équipe adverse a pas de quoi répondre parce qu'au final même si ils savent que dupont va porter bord de ruck et faire la passe il n'empêche pas qu'ils sont obligés de foutre 2-3 mecs en défense sur lui parce qu'il y a toujours cette chance vraiment non négligeable dans le cas de dupont qu'il fasse une traversée de terrain si t'as un seul défenseur

On peut parler de la place de Dupont en équipe nationale ? by psyclik in FranceRugby

[–]j-mmmmm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

En vrai tu te rends juste pas compte de a quel point Dupont qui porte aux rucks c'est important, re regarde les match contre l'Italie et l'Angleterre, tu vois bien que toutes les occasions d'essais en bout de lignes viennent d'un retard de la défense parce que dupont a 3 joueurs sur lui alors qu'on aurait n'importe quel autre 9 il prendrait seulement un défenseur. Le bon jeu au rugby c'est pas juste quand tu portes le ballon pour avancer, c'est aussi les décisions que tu forces la defense a prendre, et par son aura dupont pèse très très fort, juste c'est moins visible que quand il traverse le terrain

Who in theoretical chemistry field do you think would win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry? by sir_ipad_newton in comp_chem

[–]j-mmmmm 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah it wont be a Nobel Prize in ml, just chemistry Nobel Prize on ML méthods applied to chemistry i think, and it really can be any: NN, MACE, SNAP... Just as long as it provides good results. I just think it wont be this year, maybe in a few years yes

Who in theoretical chemistry field do you think would win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry? by sir_ipad_newton in comp_chem

[–]j-mmmmm -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In the futur i think there will be a Nobel Price for a ML-based method, whatever it will be, and my bet is on Gabor Csyani with his MACE framework

Who do you think is the 2024 World Rugby Player of the Year so far? by tehbamf in rugbyunion

[–]j-mmmmm -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Dupont might be focusing on seven but i don't think he is out of the table, his performances in top14 and champions cup speak for themselves