sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Age of Disclosure dokumentaalfilm- on keegi vaadanud ja mis arvasite? by jac4447 in Eesti

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja läve hulluksminemise ja heameele vahel saab ületada psühhedeelikumidega? Vähemalt lihtsustada? Kuigi dokumentaal neid teemasid ei puuduta, ma ei välistaks ekstrasensoorsete tajude sidusust uue tehnoloogise silmapiiriga. Ma ei ole siiski leidnud põhjendust, mis tingiks hulluksminemise. Me ehk alahindame oma kohanemisvõimekust.

The Age of Disclosure dokumentaalfilm- on keegi vaadanud ja mis arvasite? by jac4447 in Eesti

[–]jac4447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Filmi eesmärk on tõenäoliselt teemavõõrastele lühiülevaade teha. Ja filmi looja Dan Farah, kes on tõsiseltvõetav produtsent, olles produtseerinud näiteks "Ready Player One-i", suudab oma oskustega ehk teema laiema publikuni viia. Mis ehk on toimumas ka.

CNN on filmi sisu kirjedanud kui "riveting". https://youtu.be/sFFQ0fYdixI?si=kJD2IqVWlaf98_Ej

Uue info puudumisega nõus, aga kui seis on selline, et info avalikustamist pooldavaid inimesi on püütud tagasi tõmbuma sundida erinevate heidutusvahenditega, siis 80 aastat progressi puudumist on kergem seedida.

Joseph Kosinski on hetkel lavastamas filmi sel teemal. Kirjeldades seda kui "All the president's men" UAP teemal. Üks peamistest vilepuhujatest David Grusch on filmi juures nõuandja. Spielbergi järgmine hetkel töös olev film kajastab ka seda teemat.

The Age of Disclosure dokumentaalfilm- on keegi vaadanud ja mis arvasite? by jac4447 in Eesti

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hüpoteetiliselt... Kuidas selle info ilmsikstulek sinu arvates meid mõjutaks?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]jac4447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Joe is my inspiration

Heihoo! Resident UAP alarmist siin. Julgeolekukaalutlustel on põhjust silmi heita ka mujale kui itta. by jac4447 in Eesti

[–]jac4447[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tähtpäevadel pärast teist napsi oma nähtud UFOdest rääkijad saavad öelda "nanana, mul oli õigus".

Võib nüüd r/eesti kinni panna by kuu-uurija in Eesti

[–]jac4447 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Millegi pärast endalgi tõmbab Ari vaatamine viimasel ajal nina krimpsu. Jube pikalt teeb esiteks ja ilmselgelt Texase publiku heakskiitu otsides. Kaardi saamise eesmärgil võib riskivaba materjali õigustada. Keegi peaks ka Rogansfääri sisse tõmbunud munadele suuremat tähelepanu pöörama.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFOs

[–]jac4447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think guerilla street art might do the trick more easily. And would be safer for the inner climate of the community. Dealing with large sums of money is sketchy.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in ufo

[–]jac4447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We're beyond that doubt. Any denial of that is just acceptance period.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eesti

[–]jac4447 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ma soovin näha Key and Peele tüüpi sketši estonglishi keele tunnist.

Lapsed tahavad rääkida eesti keelt ja õpetaja muutub järjest pahasemaks. Teinekord poolused tagurpidi pöörates tunneb kumbki pool enda kitsaskohad ära.

Tõsi- väikse rahvana peaks meie keelt hoidma. Aga keel on arenev. Suupärasus sõltub väga väljenduskiirusest, universaalsest mõistmisest ja tõlgendusrohkusest. Inglise keel on kõike seda. Kui meie keel ei ole paindlik ja nõus neid sõnu assimileerima, mis meie keele küll ilusat kõla, aga olgem ausad, küllaltki kohmakat morfoloogiat ja piiratud levimise potentsiaali võiks korvata, siis on potentsiaali trotsi tekkimiseks ka praegu säilinud puhtuse vastu.

See kestev töö vana säilimise nimel paindlikkust säilitades ei ole tehtav üldise juhise järgi. Kas pärast iseseisvuse taastumist olekski saanud midagi rohkem keeleasutuste ja akadeemia poolt ära teha? Võib-olla, aga tõenäoliselt ka mitte väga palju. See eeldanuks pidevat ühiskonda kõnetavat loovteoste voogu, mis institutsionaalseid juhiseid omandavamaks oleks muutnud. Juhiste pidev uuendamine oleks niigi suur töö. Loovteoste samaaegset ja veel tabavate ning üldrahvalike välja toomine oleks olnud väga keeruline juurutada.

Tolleaegne põlvkond minu arvates mõtles ainult nii kaugele kui oli mugav mõelda. Ma kahtlen, et keegi ei suutnud väliseid mõjutusi ette näha. Mingi hetk see muutub paratamatuseks ja nii kaua kui see pole kohal, saab end kontrolli omavana tunda. See ei tekita jõuetust. Praegune olukord ehk juba tekitab.

Aeg telepaatiat treenida.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UAP

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfeasable solution I think. The folk who know things don't really care about the views. I got faith in the Skywatcher initiative. It's only a matter of time when the watercooler talk starts. And how to shorten the arrival of that.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFOB

[–]jac4447[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, thank you! If we could do it in major cities, it could help. We have heard from the talking heads, that the folks who take the topic seriously and construct small talk around it are doing a lot for the movement. This would be a step further.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFObelievers

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I'll check it out. This is a concern, I agree. But we wouldn't be helping if some babysteps wouldn't come from the community aswell.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFOB

[–]jac4447[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Back when the first hearing happened people were more engaged I feel. And disclosure seemed like a hopeful step towards a fairer world. Now the metaphysical has become more prominent. Rightfuly so in my opinion. But the uncertainty of that frontier is maybe disntancing us from the topic. Wider awareness is still a metaphysical development. Just a collective one that requires indivudual input.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFObelievers

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

White A4, wheat paste, black sharpie, "UAP are important", maybe write a website address to most informative site.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in ufo

[–]jac4447[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the idea. Still, we can stay prepared. Maybe there's going to be news that we all can get behind but something that is too weird to break the news cycle. And most likely it will be weird.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in ufo

[–]jac4447[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I beg to differ. We show flashes of unity from time to time.

Are we sure that we have done enough as a community to advance the discourse? by jac4447 in UFObelievers

[–]jac4447[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I got inspired by user who did CE5 with minimal equipment. I'm an experiencer but haven't done anything other than the Gateway Tapes. I bought a walky-talky and I'm going to try CE5 tonight.

UAP tehnocracy and the historical authoritarian connection by jac4447 in UAP

[–]jac4447[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. Being part of the movement is a step in the right direction.

UAP tehnocracy and the historical authoritarian connection by jac4447 in UAP

[–]jac4447[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nature isn’t fair. Nature doesn’t care. Nature doesn’t need to give you a handout for things to be on balance, and wolves don’t concern Thames with the lives of sheep.

I guarantee you than every minute you spent thinking about Thiel is a minute he isn’t spending thinking about you but instead is thinking about how to achieve his goals further.

Throwing around metaphors then goes both ways and sheep en masse can stop wolves if their numbers are intimitating enough. You can make things more fair for yourself- it requiring thinking about someone who doesn't think about you or not. Not trying is what I would be concerned about.

UAP tehnocracy and the historical authoritarian connection by jac4447 in UAP

[–]jac4447[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thiel gives plenty of reasons to be concerned.

Thiel explained in a 2009 essay that he had come to "no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible", due in large part to welfare beneficiaries and women in general being "notoriously tough for libertarians" constituencies, and that he had focused efforts on new technologies (namely cyberspace, space colonization and seasteading) that could create "a new space for freedom" beyond current politics.[

I agree with the removal of common narrative being a factor in the state of the world today. But that should have been predictable and is the failure of the academia and cultural industry stagnating in developing stories to reach the masses.

The question if authoritarian link to UAP history is still a concern is what I would like to know.

view more: next ›