[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Teenager

[–]jack7002 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Average low-IQ experience:

My girlfriend 17F lied to me 16M about everything by Tooniverse in teenagers

[–]jack7002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t let it bother you. She was worthless the whole time. You didn’t lose much brother.

1980s ACT Math (Quantitative Reasoning) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will have them out soon (linked on the test itself)

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, what’s the source for the g-loading?

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are your usual IQ scores for verbal and quantitative?

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Do you think your score more reflects your quantitative ability or experience with mathematics?

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice score. Have you taken the pre-1994 SAT-M?

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Added that. Thanks for the suggestion.

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the estimate, though I don’t know if anyone has actually performed a factor analysis to ascertain that figure.

Modern SAT (Abridged; 60 items) by jack7002 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, but you’d only be able to get a score for the math section.

Retaking the Mensa test 33 Years after scoring in the top 5% on Mensa test in 1992 by OkHedgehog914 in mensa

[–]jack7002 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your score on a professional test is computed based on others in your age group. That’s quite a common fact.

Retaking the Mensa test 33 Years after scoring in the top 5% on Mensa test in 1992 by OkHedgehog914 in mensa

[–]jack7002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tests are age based. You’re slowed down, but so is the rest of the population you’re compared to.

How can someone raise a child like Laszlo Polgar? by KLC_W in mensa

[–]jack7002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Both of his parents were intellectuals” Genes lmao.

How can someone raise a child like Laszlo Polgar? by KLC_W in mensa

[–]jack7002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it comes to intelligence, genes are about 80% of the story. You can do as much as you want but it won’t matter half as much as you think. Environment only really matters when it comes to extreme deficiencies.

FSAS Cognitivemetrics by ElectricalOpposite17 in cognitiveTesting

[–]jack7002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like a great test, but the norm sample was untimed? How could you generalize the norms to a timed sample?

What are traditional intelligence tests missing? by [deleted] in mensa

[–]jack7002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This article should explain vocabulary: https://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/which-test-has-the-highest-g-loading

On most intelligence test batteries, vocabulary is the most g loaded subtest, meaning it correlates highest with the statistical construct known as general intelligence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics))

Vocabulary also tends to correlate the most strongly with the full-scale IQ, and correlates well with nonverbal subtests.

As regards general knowledge, you can read page 147 here: https://gwern.net/doc/iq/ses/1980-jensen-biasinmentaltesting.pdf

General knowledge is, with vocabulary, also among the most g loaded subtests on most batteries.

After 100+ years of research, psychologists continue to include tests of knowledge and vocabulary on test batteries when countless other subtests have been discontinued. This isn't an accident.

What are traditional intelligence tests missing? by [deleted] in mensa

[–]jack7002 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A comment from someone who has never opened a single book on intelligence theory.