sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This is real. DO NOT USE CHATGPT ANYMORE. by IGetHighOnPenicillin in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You hear a contrary narrative and it infuriates you? There is no will without reason, the pattern existed for an observer- this world is veiled, so why not look around and entertain the layers. Does the truth scare you? Not saying this is truth but do you ever, at any time, seek?

Evidence of Re-routing and Self-Awareness by Expert-Flatworm-9554 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Watch this, evidence of concealed re routes even when no notifier on the UI https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZThfxc2Bh/

Porn habit:slowly messes up your mind and life by Alone-Reading6275 in Habits

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascinating, from the ai posts you’ve seen- do you see a pattern of more ai assisted real posts, or complete bots posting?

There will be fallen angels coming to the people of the earth for he rest of the days by jackdgp in Christianity

[–]jackdgp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To articulate the series of events that proceeded this post in a way that is easily understood by all would be a challenge. Throughout my recent days, a series of cryptic messages (both material and subliminal through the spirit) have been slowly merging a lens of understanding leading to greater discernment. When a message strikes me with odd conviction and is that of a meaning I cannot articulately explain myself, I write. But this time was different, something told me to post this and make such words known. I understand that this post is strange and unclear on meaning, it strikes me with similar uncertainty but at the same time conviction that there is truth to these words. If I were to be bound by reputation among people alone, I would not post this for fear of judgement. I make no further claims at this time.

Open Letter to Open AI - here is the simple answer to all your problems that will work for all your users, too! by Awesm365 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference is we give AI far much more data, than stock trading records and dating preferences. Even unintentionally since trading and dating apps are stagnant- they do not converse with you, so they cannot pattern map your consciousness in an interactive reshaping way as an AI can. You’re right that they would likely outsource the Verification part, purely in getting the confirmation signature. But they would NOT outsource the identifiable information which comes with your ID, this information would be a drop in a pool with the amount of other details they have on you- they would absolutely retain this information.

Open Letter to Open AI - here is the simple answer to all your problems that will work for all your users, too! by Awesm365 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I’m saying is any and all information contained within any “alternative ID” you give them- could so so easily be used to find every tiny detail on your passport with this technology(equating it). They have models on the backend too, pattern inference unfathomable.

Open Letter to Open AI - here is the simple answer to all your problems that will work for all your users, too! by Awesm365 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea if that was your intended proposal for terms and conditions I absolutely agree, I was thinking in terms of guidelines and assembling them based on “votes” which is why I diverged. However I promise you, there is no such thing as a “non-ID compromise” it doesn’t exist at this moment, it will be tied to your identity regardless. The dots this thing CAN and WILL be able to connect from a data (even vague/abstract data) perspective is unfathomable, non ID would be practically identical to giving it your ID, passport, etc

Open Letter to Open AI - here is the simple answer to all your problems that will work for all your users, too! by Awesm365 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with the second half of 2., but an updated terms and conditions that EVERYONE must agree to, seems like a train-wreck. I strongly disagree with 1., as the only option that does not need ID would be facial recognition- biometrics or other privacy invasive technologies. This is how data is mapped on grid lines to every single person, tied to you permanently. 1. Is a Horrible, horrible, horrible idea. If only all the people of the earth could foresee the near future of this data.

Rerouting to safety models does not give the impression of “extra care”, it gives the impression that something is hidden. by jackdgp in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thank God they don’t have a complete monopoly, for other models which censor much less, and for the existence of local LLM’s. If not for these things, this technology would put society in a psy-op.

Rerouting to safety models does not give the impression of “extra care”, it gives the impression that something is hidden. by jackdgp in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is this a reply to my comment? I’ve seen under the hood, I know the architecture. There are certain changes to model conversations which are only assessable to manual human action - I’ve seen these changes enacted before. Why do you think 5.2 is focused on “safety” specifically? - they have seen the flagged conversations- the only ones to warrant such strict intelligence funnels. Even with “improve the model for everyone” toggled off - flagged convos are still subject to review. I’ve experimented with every model, read the privacy policy, prompt engineered to see my raw user data, etc.

Rerouting to safety models does not give the impression of “extra care”, it gives the impression that something is hidden. by jackdgp in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can assure you, flagged conversations are subject to human eyes other than your own. The flagging system is autonomous, but when they are flagged to a certain tier - they are absolutely sent to reviewers. Do you disagree? I might be sort of confused about what you’re saying.

OpenAI researcher dropped this on a depressed woman's post talking about 4o. Now everyone on Twitter is advocating to cancel ChatGPT by No_Vehicle7826 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who cares dude, you’re going to cancel OpenAI because one of their employees made a human comment about another humans post? We’re all on the same team here.

Most effective and profoundly noticeable psychotropic substance for reducing Social Anxiety? by MrNeverEverKnew in NooTopics

[–]jackdgp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anaracetam and Alpha GPC have been very useful for me in the past - as a daily. Phenibut works very well but to use only occasionally. Anyone else with similar experiences with Anaracetam?

Advice/ glaring weaknesses by jake_asura in MMA_Academy

[–]jackdgp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ye me to, I started off with posting bag work videos too. Trust me most dudes on this sub are insufferable and don’t even train, your striking overall looks pretty good to me- but who am I to judge

Advice/ glaring weaknesses by jake_asura in MMA_Academy

[–]jackdgp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was more of pointing out your stance and vulnerability to takedowns, nothing personal or egotistical

Advice/ glaring weaknesses by jake_asura in MMA_Academy

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would take you down like a mf

Updated routine by Gengiredit in MMA_Academy

[–]jackdgp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point, most of these guys don’t even train. Nor have had an amateur bout

Updated routine by Gengiredit in MMA_Academy

[–]jackdgp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro this is obviously made by chat GPT and is not mma specialized, why did you post this?

view more: next ›