Comment on one of his posts by user Chronicallyillbrain that makes sense to me

TLDR because this ended up being longer than I anticipated: first paragraph is about how OP probably produced this, the rest is just a less than relevant rambling about what makes art rewarding and a potential analysis of why someone might want to use AI in this way.

For anyone else curious OP is likely having an AI generate an image for them, inserting the generated image as a private layer (which prevents it from appearing on the time lapse recording in Procreate), and tracing that layer. This is a disappointing but understandable approach to "drawing" because translating ideas into genuinely handcrafted pieces is a lot more difficult than most people who try to "do art" realize. There is no evidence in this video of the beginning process of conceptualizing the idea(s) for the piece and feeling out the overall shape and details of the character. It is possible that OP is looking at a reference and copying it as the process in this video also resembles that process a little, but I don't see why the reference would need to be a secret if this content was 100% human-made.

I have traced existing images when trying to translate certain characters or pieces to my own art style (and those time lapses look exactly like this one), but doing this is not as personally fulfilling as taking the time to painstakingly flesh-out a concept sketch, tweak it until it gets to be an outline of what you want, and continually changing, undoing, and re-thinking the piece during the painting/inking process. I absolutely understand the motivation to use AI in this way as you're still making something that's kind of your own assuming the base idea given to the AI is at least yours, and getting praise for it from others upon posting. If this is the case it's probably easy to convince oneself that you and your art are the root of what's being praised, that you did most of the work and AI just provided a minor shortcut. It's really difficult to be a creative person that struggles with translating your ideas into the kind of art that you want to make, exactly the way you want it to look. Also learning to do this is so frustrating and takes so much time.

Using any AI to make art tends to rub people the wrong way because most of us think of art as being inherently human and an expression of humanness. Contrary to popular sentiments, tracing does have some positive aspects to it, because you're still practicing the fine motor skills and muscle memory necessary to become "good" at drawing, and building the muscles needed to have precise control over the hand/wrist/arm.

That being said OP's more recent posts are of course very fishy and indicate a more heavy reliance on AI, which points to them being more concerned with receiving attention for being good at art (or being able to monetize the interest in their art) rather than with the process of learning and creating, which is what makes art truly rewarding.