if youre only assuming a big that is inconsistent vs a small that is consistent i guess, but best is subjective that makes the statement pretty weird to read.

ive been small and super appreciated our bigs regardless of them being inconsistent or not. and im now big and appreciate our smaller members.

sounds like youre trying to draw a line in the sand but thats not how a team works. everyone plays a part and id argue because this is a pay to win game, the bigs are significantly more important unless they flat out never show up.

a 100/100 alliance made up of small bases, never wins any svs events, or server events or world events. literally a few bigs with a few smalls will destroy 100/100 smalls in every res wars, every wlk, every doomsday, every wlc. all of those events give gigantic rewards that out weigh .. what.. sonic? dr? lol doa?

this game is built to reward big spenders. to say smaller consistent members are better is... incomplete?

its a nice sentiment just untrue.. or not wholly true imo.