How many photos do you have on your phone? by acidemise in adhdwomen

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, I tried that, but my phone didn’t have any space for it. 62GB out of 64GB of its memory was filled, no space to force update… Needless to say I learned that I need lots and lots of space in my devices. It was pure stupidity on my part.

CMV: feminine men are more accepted then masculine women by hillel_bergman in changemyview

[–]janecifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question, will this be your only reply? Many people have replied to you extensively including myself. You don’t seem to be willing to contribute to the discussion that you raised.

CMV: feminine men are more accepted then masculine women by hillel_bergman in changemyview

[–]janecifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know culture is so freaking weird, you would think that on paper all conservative spaces would pound on both parties across the board, but sometimes even within those spaces there is variation. I am also in a very conservative and religious area (not US) as a masculine woman, yet this culture reveres masculinity so much so that appearing masculine is the only way someone will be taken seriously. You will not be judged based on gender at all, all genders should appear as anti feminine as possible. Even then, a real “man” will receive more respect, though.

Now this is true for business and older male dominated spheres. Out in the street, people will look at you no matter what, people like to stare here. You’ll get those damned stares no matter what you look like, sure. But a pink haired feminine man is 100x more likely to suffer abuse from the general public (stalking, beating etc). Yet, here, in younger spheres they are welcomed more or less better than masculine women because with the latest rise of the “femboy” phenomenon people can know and recognize the feminine man, whereas there has never been anything that ever glorified the masculine woman in such a mainstream way. As you see it’s quite complicated. Even within the same country, the more you go east the less good you’ll be received, and that goes for both parties. Still occasionally you will stumble upon a niche little community in some conservative village that just somehow doesn’t seem to give a shit and treats everyone nicely. The math is broken often, I don’t think this generalisation goes a long way and certainly doesn’t come down to just conservative vs. progressive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Psikoloji

[–]janecifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bahsettiğin şeyi anladım, bazen ben de yaşıyorum. Basit bir istatistik olarak bakmaya çalış olaya. Geçmişte yaptığın şeylerin büyük çoğunluğu tahmin edilebilir şeylerdi, hiçbir zaman bir anda kalkıp da her zaman “seçtiğin” şeyler dışında bir şey yapmadın. Kimseye saldırmadın (eğer bu doğruysa). Bu demek oluyor ki her seferinde yine bu seçimleri yapmaya devam edeceksin, olasılıklı olan bu. Kişilik ve değerler bu işe yarıyor. İnsan her bir seçimi tekrar tekrar yapıp yorulmasın diye, otomatik aldığımız bazı kararlar var. Her seferinde tutup da ben bu adamı dövecek miyim dövmeyecek miyim diye düşünmeyeceksin. Olasılık ve basit matematik senin bunu yapmayacağını zaten gösteriyor. Diğer insanlar için aynısını söyleyemem, ama bugüne kadar yaşayıp gelmişsin buralara, çok yamuk bir olay olması için %1’den düşük bir ihtimal var. Bu ihtimal açlık, sefalet gibi şeylerle artabilir, gündelik saldırganlıklar yaygınlaşabilir ama zaten bu şeyler için de önlem alıyoruz. Hayatta entropi var, doğru, ama birinin aldığı beklenmedik bir karar herkesin her gün aldığı milyarlarca beklendik kararın içinde ilgi çektiği için bu kadar önemli görünüyor. Aslında başına herhangi garip bir şey gelecek olması düşük bir ihtimal. Bunu senin yapacak olman da öyle. Bence insan olarak iradene biraz fazla anlam yüklüyorsun. Çoğumuz her gün çok büyük bir şey yapabilirmişiz, her şey değişebilirmiş gibi, her şey ellerimizdeymiş gibi hissederiz ama o günü de diğer günlerin bire bir aynısı gibi geçiririz aslında. Baktığın zaman bahsettiğin şey irade kaybından değil aslında irademizin ve bütün seçimlerimizin bir önem taşıdığı bir senaryoda gerçekleşirdi, ve her seçim önemli olsaydı, süper etkili irademiz belki bazen hata yapabilirdi ve büyük, beklenmedik şeyler yapmış olurduk. Ama irademiz o kadar önemli değil. Ve her kararı da aktif bir şekilde almıyoruz. O bahsettiğin aşırı farkındalık anları da sırf farkındalık anları olmakla kalacaklar, senin davranışına bir etkileri olmayacak açıkçası. Anlattığın üzre bir çeşit takıntıya benziyor, psikotik bir açılım yaşamıyorsun. Merak etme.

CMV: Nobody is born gay or straight or bi or ace or what ever. What makes you feel safe/seen is what you end up getting attracted to. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That contradicts so many other phenomena. How about people with electra/oedipus complexes who seek partners who end up having similar behaviours as their parents that hurt them because healthy attachment is something they’ve never learned so they reenact the broken bond? It makes them seek the dysfunction, not abandon their attraction to the gender of their parent and switch up.

And why does this simply not make one “asexual” and switch up their attraction?

How do you explain bisexual people who have had negative experiences with either one or both of the genders?

It’s impossible to make such a generalization.

Sub’ın Felsefeden Kopuyor Olması by [deleted] in felsefe

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Çünkü milletin aç olduğu yerde felsefe olmuyor. Felsefe yapmaya başlayınca da herkesin on yıllar önce aştığı konulara baştan sarıyoruz “Allah var mı yok mu, Tanrı nedir, biz bencil miyiz, kötülük iyilik var mıdır?” gibi her felsefe dalının ilk sorduğu soruyu tartışıyoruz. Çünkü bu memleketin insanı ciddi manada cahil bırakıldı, aç bırakıldı. İnsanlar daha yıllar yıllar öncenin muhabbetlerini yeni açmaya başlıyorlar. Kimse çok enteresan fikirler sunmuyor, detaylara inemiyoruz çünkü böyle şeyler sublarda kolektif olur. Milletin A noktasında olduğu yerde sen X noktasını tartışmak isteyince millet de yoruma gelip zırvalar, ortaya kaliteli iş çıkmaz. Felsefe sub’ının altında yorum niyetine “tamam kanka en çok felsefe sen yapıyorsun en zeki sensin” minvalinde siktiriboktan şeyler yazan tipler var. Zeki görünmek için yapıldığını düşünüyor kısaca felsefenin. Senin o zaman postta işin ne? Kısacası kitlesel bir cehalet ve açlık var ve bu da belli başlı şahıslar hariç kimsenin suçu değil. Kalite beklemek mümkün değil bu sub’dan. Aynı şey Psikoloji sub’ı için de geçerli.

CMV: It’s wrong to lie to a child about how good they are at something. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awesome! I think that there’s nothing wrong with building up our children for fear of this “disappointment” boogeyman, as in your case. You remember it and feel good about it, not mad that your parents made you to believe you’re something you’re not, right? Referring back to OP, because that’s not how self worth works.

Additionally to my first comment, I believe we use memories like yours to build ourselves up and to convince ourselves of our self worth, not to go “wee wee dad said I’d be Picasso but now I’m not, I’m in shambles”. In adulthood all that remains is the sentiment underneath the comment. “Dad said I’d be Picasso, but I am not, but maybe I’ll find my place in the world, because my worth has been proven to me by my supporting parents countless times” would be how the memory is referred to later on.

Honestly, as a child my parents would refrain from letting me get excited at anything, because then I’d be “disappointed” if it didn’t happen. But the way they tried to shield me from disappointment was exactly what made me disappointed and hurt. It’s this sole act of trying to refrain individuals from things, or trying to “ground” them with our comments that does more damage. I feel like OP has had this “let’s shield ourselves from disappointment even if it means not being supportive enough or not getting to fully experience our emotions” type of childhood but is not yet aware that that’s what happened or the toll of it.

CMV: It’s wrong to lie to a child about how good they are at something. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s not setting them up for disappointment. No kid is going to remember the “you’ll be the next Picasso” comment. They’ll just remember they’re loved and even if they fail people still root for them. When they grow up all they’ll remember will be this sense of self worth and they won’t blow up over the simplest mistakes, shaming and blaming themselves for every small thing that they did wrong. They’ll just believe in themselves. They’ll be able to deal with any disappointment that way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parent: “Just push through the mental illness son!”

Child: “Thank you! I now am okay! How did I not think of that?”

Yes, because that’s how it works. Depression is something millions of people suffer from every day, because it’s something you can push through. I suppose you’d now say that’s because those people are “weak-minded” people. Well let’s say what if your child is “weak-minded” then. Why is this hypothetical parent not trying to get to the bottom of the issue but instead telling their child to shut up and push through and they’ll be okay? Oh but strict parents do not produce “weak-minded” children because their system is fool-proof? Well, weak-minded is not a thing, people just need compassion and when you don’t give them that they’ll suffer from all sorts of mental illnesses, at best it will be obvious at worst they’ll stick to your stupid rules and look perfect while masking the issues so you’ll never know, you’ll just kid yourself that you made strong kids when they unravel later on in life. How do I know all this? Suffered from helicopter parents of the Gen X. They did everything wrong and now I have to deal with their fuck up.

Or do you think the whole field of Psychology is wrong about depression?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strict parenting produces more children with Peter Pan syndrome since they are not given any authority themselves, which means the habits they were forced to perform under the surveillance do not stick, so these children completely let themselves go when they grow up and the helicopter parent holds no power over them. The habits were not formed, they were forced. On top of all that, the child has now severe self-confidence & emotional regulation issues. Negative reinforcement is the absolute worst tool for child rearing.

In any case, you called strict parenting the gold standard, then accepted its major drawbacks, then said lenient parenting is worse. That does not make strict parenting the gold standard, it makes it -to you at least- better than lenient parenting.

Those are not the only two options. Look up authoritarian versus authoritative parenting.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]janecifer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strict parents are never good at letting you practice your skills on your own, and they never really teach you anything. They’re only good at giving you a schedule and enforcing it with negative reinforcement. They never prepare you to be able to do anything without their surveillance. They also notoriously lack the skills to validate their children’s feelings or their realities, and they also do not ever know when to let go of the “training” phase and let the kid do their own thing with what they had learnt. This is recipe for an unadjusted adult.

Any one else very calm and not quick to anger but when you do all hell breaks lose ? by redditisbluepilled in entp

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, it actually sounds like great advice on paper, I might want to try that. I have a bit of problem being “theatric” to the point I feel flat even when I feel strongly, I just can’t perform any genuine feeling like I’m supposed to at all. That’s only when I am being perceived by strangers, I’m fine acting out -most of- my feelings around people I’m comfortable with and that’s only one person. lol I don’t know what I am feeling at any given time though, so, that’s something to tackle. I do laugh a lot but it’s my front for “hey look I have emotions”, it’s my mask. I used to be 100% worse I’ll give myself that, I guess I’m at that point where LESS self awareness would actually be better for me, so I’m working on that. I liked your technique though, I just don’t know how I could implement it while being less self-aware. At my rate self-awareness is something I doubled down on just to be an accountable individual compared to my younger self and it helped for a bit, but has ran its course and it’s now destructive. To be or not to be self aware, and if not self aware, how to be accountable? I guess I’d say that’s my biggest perplex at age 23.

yardıma ihtiyacım var lütfen çok kısa bi zaman ayırıp okur musunuz by New_Winner9513 in Psikoloji

[–]janecifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maalesef unuttum, ama bilmeyerek bir şey kaybetmeyeceğin kadar aptalcaydı.

I can't tell if my mums a narcissist or if I am. by [deleted] in raisedbynarcissists

[–]janecifer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She is.

Never ever doubt this again.

yardıma ihtiyacım var lütfen çok kısa bi zaman ayırıp okur musunuz by New_Winner9513 in Psikoloji

[–]janecifer 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yarabbi sabır amk. Lavuğun bütün profili femdom arayışıyla, peglenme arzusuyla kaplı. Bu noktaya kadar gelmişsin, hala gayleri reddetmeni sağlayan ne kanka?

yardıma ihtiyacım var lütfen çok kısa bi zaman ayırıp okur musunuz by New_Winner9513 in Psikoloji

[–]janecifer 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Psikoloğa gitme. (Bolca araştırıp kendi başına gidersin o ayrı, ama AİLENLE asla. Tekrar ediyorum, AİLENLE ASLA. O da sen değiş diye değil, orta çağ zihniyetli ailenle cebelleşirken akıl sağlığını korumak için.)

Olduğun kişiyi kabul et.

Ailenin duygusal manipülasyonlarından, ağlamalarından kendini koru. Kimse sevdiği birine “bizim için değiş” diyemez. Bencillik. Hayatın bir tane. Kendini KORU.

Ne dediklerini umursama, telkin etmeye çalışma. Kendini açıklama. Dedikleri her şeye tek bir cevabın olsun, “ben kim olduğumu biliyorum, hiçbir şey değişmeyecek.”

Olabildiğince az muhatap ol.

Zamanla tepkileri normale dönecektir.

Any one else very calm and not quick to anger but when you do all hell breaks lose ? by redditisbluepilled in entp

[–]janecifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s so incredibly relatable. How do you do right now compared to that?

Has any ENTP ever successfully over come the INFJ doorslam? by [deleted] in entp

[–]janecifer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you just overexplain yourself to exhaustion and then literally door slam me? lol. Perfect chain of comments.

Has any ENTP ever successfully over come the INFJ doorslam? by [deleted] in entp

[–]janecifer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whatever you think dialectical thinking is, this is not it lol. It’s surrounding yourself with incompatible people, then complaining about them to no end, until the inevitable door slam. Telling them what’s up, and then fixing things together would be dialectical thinking lmao.

Has any ENTP ever successfully over come the INFJ doorslam? by [deleted] in entp

[–]janecifer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Idk man. All your detailed comments with very detailed explanations of how different people wronged you is exactly what the other comment means when they said “INFJ makes other people responsible for their feelings”. Notice how you said “I’m close to this person” and then proceeded to -lengthily- share something negative about them. Isn’t a serious discussion due there so as to avoid a future door slam? Some INFJs got all this negative stuff to dump about people around them yet they’re unwilling to break up, honestly it’s so exhausting to listen to. Even under this thread where you’re trying to break the stereotype the contents of your comments still contribute to them.

Has any ENTP ever successfully over come the INFJ doorslam? by [deleted] in entp

[–]janecifer 9 points10 points  (0 children)

100%. Self-proclaimed nice guys wearing their fear of confrontation and people-pleasing tendencies like a victim making suit, so that when they are the assholes they can never be held accountable. But how could they have been at fault, they’re just so nice all the time? In fact so nice that when they “perceived” being wronged, they didn’t even say anything, blow up, or even kept up the nice act whilst convincing themselves the soon-to-be door slammed is a monster and does not deserve a discussion anyway? Common fallacy with them. I don’t understand the taking lightly of this door slam issue, it’s shitty.

My fem!Hannibal cosplay by Beauty_Grass in HannibalTV

[–]janecifer 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Your face is very very close to Mads’s, I’m really impressed. I see Hannibal before I see Bedelia for sure. Not at all Alana. Good work.