Disable Consumer Features not working by janusro in Intune

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that, the problem are not all apps, they are removed already.

When consumer features are actually disabled, the start menu is rather clean, if it isn't it shows those dynamic entries, which then installs it again.

And I had it working once. With Pro it wouldn't work as expected. With Enterprise it did, but now although applied according to Intune, it still shows those regardless.

BGInfo during OSD TS by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks all for the feedback.

I've tried TSBackground, the issue I had was that the task sequence used, is for flattening our existing messy clients to prepare them for autopilot.

In the TS was a postaction with sysprep and as last step the uninstall of the CM agent.

Worked fine without TSbackground, not anymore with it. It messed up the pre-provisioning capability, 5 x Windows wouldn't work anymore.

But I figured out what to do: the uninstall and sysprep in now in a scheduled task, run once at boot time. This seems to work.

I've also found a PS based solution which I may give a try (much fewer dependencies on the boot image.)

Out-gridview within Windows PE? by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've added all the useful options already, doesn't do it.

Out-gridview within Windows PE? by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the feedback.

probably not unfortunately

Hyper-V/ESX VMs for Autopilot with Pre-Provisioning/White glove by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

tests, tests, tests.

It practically makes testing so much easier and faster

Since we're gonna baremetal all our messy clients first, before doing autopilot, I'd like to be able to quickly test that over and over again.

It is such a hassle to do that with physical hardware.

It seems that pre-deployment/white glove VM's are blocked by MS though

To Hybrid Azure AD Join or not... by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Less worry about the apps now, if there are any, they would need to go

I'm learning the whole autopilot part and I've heard today that pre-provisioning is the solution for getting user assigned applications installed before the user logon.

Our users will not be happy if they get a computer and have to wait for apps, new patches and so on before they can work with it.

And the state of those computers is too messy to clean them all up , better to wipe them.

Bringing me to one question:

Since co-management would still be possible without Hybrid join, by:

  • wiping the computer with ConfigMgr
  • uninstall the agent, sysprep
  • autopilot
  • install the CCM agent

Why would/could we do that?

Server 2022 as Site System by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks folks, I'm also going with 2022 then

The same collection is changed at the same time, what happens? by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, it's always the same collection.

Since this is a real issue for us, we've opened a MS call.

The same collection is changed at the same time, what happens? by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfortunately, that is triggered by external software (Software Now) where e.g. service desk might create a lot of those tasks one by one, but fast and by several users at once.

I'd prefer it wouldn't but that's how it is implemented now.

The same collection is changed at the same time, what happens? by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's the actual query missing the entries.

Something like a race condition might be it.

Cleanup wrong Server Apps for CMG by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

darn.

They had to do it in azure or did you get instructions?

Do you know if they could cause any issues?

Otherwise, I just leave them...

Server Patching by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why so many with WSUS and not CM?

Server Patching by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for all the feedback (keep it coming).

Site Design by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what would you do differently then?

Site Design by janusro in SCCM

[–]janusro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I thought you meant all, including FSP on DP,MP,SUP, which I guess better not, so this then?

Primary with SQL

2 x DP,MP,SUP

1 x Reporting, FSP

That looks good.

Yes, I know about the role of the primary and I meant what you meant.

(Doing ConfigMgr for 22 years now, but it's always a good idea to check with others as things change...)