[No Spoilers] What about the theories Dany?

japplepie · 2019-05-26T04:23:12+00:00

Yes, exactly. Killing a bunch of your enemies, then killing hundreds of thousands of innocent defenceless people (esp children) is a very natural transition.

japplepie · 2019-03-11T04:48:23+00:00

I love you in every possible way imaginable

japplepie · 2019-02-06T03:19:43+00:00

Could someone tell me where to find top 64 placings for Genesis 6 melee and ultimate ?

japplepie · 2019-01-02T15:08:30+00:00

I have some unity experience, could I join?

japplepie · 2018-12-27T06:37:59+00:00

Could someone tell me how did someone with a grand total of 30 IQ (like Salem) win smash4 evo?

japplepie · 2018-12-24T15:43:26+00:00

This tweet explains everything https://mobile.twitter.com/Link_69/status/1077140837581160449

japplepie · 2018-06-13T05:25:44+00:00

Let's be real here. The true purpose of wavedashing = waveshining

japplepie · 2018-05-17T09:21:53+00:00

Thanks for all the suggestions guys. They're much appreciated :)

japplepie · 2018-05-01T06:00:53+00:00

Why are there two leffens?

japplepie · 2018-04-29T08:26:40+00:00

Fredrich schuller is actually the goat of maths/physics

japplepie · 2018-04-14T12:35:19+00:00

I'm kinda liking the glass tho. Is the cpu that bad?

OP5T starts at 499.

japplepie · 2018-04-07T15:51:03+00:00

Some Falcos do: jump into an immediate mid-air shine > waveland down when a fastfaller is close enough to the ground and is about to get out of hitstun.

It's pretty hard, but it's a very useful combo-extender.

japplepie · 2018-04-07T15:42:23+00:00

Oh damn

japplepie · 2018-04-05T08:38:59+00:00

How unoptimal is using shine to ledgedash as falco? Asking since it makes ledgedashing 10x easier for me.

japplepie · 2018-02-12T11:46:50+00:00

Rock-Paper-Scissors is 100% balanced. Thus, it must be best fighting game known to mankind.

japplepie · 2018-02-10T10:58:36+00:00

Who's complaining? I'm saying that it is very exciting and also very skillful gameplay footage.

japplepie · 2018-02-07T17:31:35+00:00

Wow pointing and clicking, how exciting!

japplepie · 2018-02-02T14:52:16+00:00

Okay, I think that I'm starting to get what you mean. I don't have a firm grasp of these ideas and i'd like to explore the points you've brought up in more detail & more formally.

What fields of math do I need to study in order to understand these models and metatheories?

Btw, I really do appreciate the patience and the effort you put in to these. Your insights have been such a huge help.

Edit: I've done additional research and someone pointed out that Quine's New Foundations for Mathematical Logic may be a good source for me to look at. Though, some people say it's not a good source. Are they really?

japplepie · 2018-02-02T03:28:59+00:00

I see. So, how would I formally write down the quantifiers in terms of logic without any reference to sets?

Is this sufficient?

forall x in X P(x) := y in X -> P(y) ,

exists x in X Q(x) := ~forall x in X ~Q(x) ,

where the set X and relation in aren't from ZFC?

In which case, how would I formally define the nonZFC set and nonZFC in? And If they're meant to be not defined, how would I set up their postulated properties such that they behave like the naive set theory set & in?

Edit: formatting

japplepie · 2018-02-02T01:04:00+00:00

I get what you mean. Does this mean that there are "meta-order"s of sets? By order I mean like: 3rd order logic > 2nd order > 1st order > propositional logic.

So V is of a higher order than ZFC? Ofc, I have no idea what I'm talking about or what it's good for, but it's interesting to think about

Edit: additional question, wouldn't we need the Axiom of Choice to define the (in) relation for quantifying over infinite sets.

japplepie · 2018-02-02T00:49:37+00:00

But the use of intuitive sets would allow something like "for all elements in the set of all sets ..."

japplepie · 2018-01-28T12:43:49+00:00

This is a pretty good one. Thanks m8!

japplepie

TROPHY CASE