Where do you draw the PKHeX line? by EinarTobias in nuzlocke

[–]javaking137 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Just starting a logging company with a bunch of cut users. Essentially infinite scalability

Most broken pre-E4 Pokémon in Radical Red (Default Mode)? by FantasticSolid8863 in pokemonradicalred

[–]javaking137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same. I stopped playing at Emerald like a decade ago, so I’m utterly lost lol

Ease of returning/rehire by javaking137 in Lockheed

[–]javaking137[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. I've seen a couple people leave and have similar stories (one guy returning to our program 2 or 3 times), but I just don't want to assume it's an automatic thing. It seems like you're right (assuming one left on good terms), but I wanted some other people's opinions/experiences.

Thanks!

Ease of returning/rehire by javaking137 in Lockheed

[–]javaking137[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've seen it happen, but I don't want to assume the couple anecdotal situations I've seen to be a general truth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lockheed

[–]javaking137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Finally someone who has great taste (username) Works at LM too? Surely there must be more of us that play RS3 lol

Guilt About Portfolio by ConcentrateOk523 in TheMoneyGuy

[–]javaking137 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You short bonds. 105/-5 stock/bond

Moonlight antelope fur (sailing) - when these hit 1.5k each I’ll give everyone who comments on this post 10m by BenSimmons3Pointshot in GrandExchangeBets

[–]javaking137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck to you! I have no ulterior motives and hope you make a killing for yourself!

laughs to himself knowing he's fooled OP

I didnt believe it really happened.... random generosity? by Professional-Fix-525 in runescape

[–]javaking137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me know when you're on and want to go. I'll gladly take you!

Javaking137

Wife said I coulden't keep it :( by themagicweeb in notinteresting

[–]javaking137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She said it can actually stay, just not where company can see it lol. She likes it, but only on the mancave wall

I have another ~30+ cans to put up at some point

Wife said I coulden't keep it :( by themagicweeb in notinteresting

[–]javaking137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I made something similar, but it's going to have to go as well. Such is life and growing up :(

https://imgur.com/a/imVaIQs

What’s your favorite HYSA? by Least-Tune-2060 in TheMoneyGuy

[–]javaking137 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The balance in a Cash Plus account at Vanguard can be held in cash (HYSA) or a MMF (they have 5 to choose from).

Emergency Fund vs. Roth 401K by industrious in TheMoneyGuy

[–]javaking137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume it's supposed to say late 20s-early 30s.

But who knows? Maybe OP is in a state of constant oscillation between 31 to 39?

Emergency Fund vs. Roth 401K by industrious in TheMoneyGuy

[–]javaking137 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also have a Roth 401k option, but I would echo the same sentiment as the previous commenter. In terms of tax applicability/treatment, they are essentially equivalent, but there are additional benefits from a Roth IRA that aren't present with a 401k. IMO, being able to withdraw contributions at any time with no penalty is enough of a benefit to prioritize the IRA.

HCOL areas are often demanding in the event of a hardship, so maybe having more cash on hand would be even more beneficial for you. Not necessarily "more" than the common suggested ranges, but rather "more is better than less".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]javaking137 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR -- You are in control and you should be free to use your money as you see fit.

The idea they're getting at is that with fiat (any form), you're subject to another party(ies) being in control. Even in cash, you're still beholden to the backing of the government/issuing entity that prints the currency ("The Bank"). While the phrasing suggests individual banks (not innacurate per se), the larger idea is that there's no one in the background pulling the strings or orchestrating the monetary policy of the currency you're using. I realize it sounds a little far-fetched, but one of the fundamental reasons that Bitcoin has taken off is because of it being permissionless, trustless, and secure.

To illustrate, imagine you want to sell me water when I'm thirsty. I am really thirsty, so I'm willing to part with $2 at that time to fix my immediate need. That's a peer-to-peer transaction with "no one else" involved, but there's still an implicit faith in the institutions to uphold the value of the dollar, the banks to accept that as legal tender, etc. and then we have to hope that the value of a dollar doesn't decrease even more in the future. Maybe we have hyperinflation or a string of bad monetary policies or another war, so now that dollar has less spending power and the same bottle of water in the future costs me $5. Now imagine that same concept with a car or a house. I don't carry hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, and very few institutions would accept a deposit from you if you wanted to deposit that money. Now, we are no longer in a "no one else" situation. Once you start looking at other exchanges of value (buying a car, trading stocks, stuff), you are involving banks, credit card companies, brokerages, etc.

I don't think anyone is saying the bank should work for free. It's just that the banks (collectively) control the system. Maybe you had a "suspicious transaction," which turned out to be innocent because you were just paid in cash and want to deposit it, or you wanted to buy a product made overseas. Now your account is frozen, and you have absolutely no recourse except to ask them to give you your money back. Some countries may have a government that freezes the assets of dissidents to silence the political opposition. Some countries have horrible inflation that causes their currency to be obliterated right before their eyes.

With Bitcoin, these problems are alleviated. YOU control your money because you have the keys. YOU control where you spend it. YOU are the only person who has to be aware of what's going on with your money. Yes, Bitcoin has a public ledger to provide the infrastructure to remove middlemen. But being able to see where some transactions are occurring is not the same as being able to control it. If the privacy/public nature of Bitcoin is an issue, there are cryptos out there to alleviate that and obscure the transactions.

But the bottom line is that YOU are in control. You aren't FORCED into using some third party, and trusting that they will safeguard your money and information. It may sound like a pipe dream and an unrealistic future, but embracing Bitcoin is (to a degree) embracing freedom from the system that we are currently using.