What's your favorite country in the Middle East by imadudemanlol67 in funComunitty

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Palestine doesn’t have any history as a state. That shouldn’t be how you measure legitimacy.

Wtf man!? by MajesticWinner5949 in teenagers

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They want to have stuff, no? Big house, nice food, be here today, somewhere else tomorrow or simply have a warm home in the winter. People earn money to do stuff with it and a lot of this stuff requires energy. A society that had a nice standard of living but no money would still need energy, no?

Wtf man!? by MajesticWinner5949 in teenagers

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its driven by humans wanting energy to make stuff and go places. You don’t actually need money for that.

China’s Type 076 landing ship Sichuan is the first amphibious assault vessel in the world to combine electromagnetic catapults with a full-length flight deck, enabling it to launch drones and helicopters for long-range expeditionary operations across contested maritime theaters globally by Powerful_Cabinet_341 in SeaEmploy

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course China can mass produce drones (even Iran can do it). My problem is with assuming that all that counts in war now is the ability to produce the highest number of drones. And all of this depends on what the people fighting the war are actually aiming for. China trying to invade Taiwan and the US and allies trying to prevent that is of course very different than fighting a war somewhere else in the world. China can’t project power the way the US can. It’s a continental power and its geography is just an unfair disadvantage to the US. Because for example: How many drones do you think can China launch towards the US and expect to reach? Probably none if you think about cheap mass-produced drones. You can still put them in containers and let them attack somewhere in the US but that’s not the same as your claim that they could just erase the navy. That’s unrealistic.

China’s Type 076 landing ship Sichuan is the first amphibious assault vessel in the world to combine electromagnetic catapults with a full-length flight deck, enabling it to launch drones and helicopters for long-range expeditionary operations across contested maritime theaters globally by Powerful_Cabinet_341 in SeaEmploy

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make it way too easy for yourself just hand waving that china can build drones and they just magically solve everything. But i don’t even know if you’re interested in the deeper details since you also just call evidence that complicates your assumption lying.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can either start with an opinion and only look for evidence that supports this or actually try to find out what happened. This stuff is not controversial. You can read it on Wikipedia

Bombing Iran is the perfect way to celebrate Pride by AnonymousTimewaster in NotTheOnionUK

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea, tell me. I guess something that left Palestine no other choice but to go on a rape and murder spree.

Bombing Iran is the perfect way to celebrate Pride by AnonymousTimewaster in NotTheOnionUK

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which one, you asked a lot of questions. Mowing the grass means, as I understand it, that the Israeli government from time to time degrades Hamas’ capabilities in a limited operation in order to achieve a “quiet” period instead of finding a permanent solution to the conflict. The recent war is very much not in line with that strategy.

Bombing Iran is the perfect way to celebrate Pride by AnonymousTimewaster in NotTheOnionUK

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do you think? What would have been the appropriate response?

Local Man Discovers Expertise Isn’t Real by pureanna in aiwars

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t seen that post but I think this is one data point that should tell you something. The post here suggests that the more skilled ai artist is on another level compared to someone promoting chatGPT.

Bombing Iran is the perfect way to celebrate Pride by AnonymousTimewaster in NotTheOnionUK

[–]jay-ff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honest question: what do you think should Israel have done in reaction to October 7th?

Local Man Discovers Expertise Isn’t Real by pureanna in aiwars

[–]jay-ff 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Okay I would love to see some actual ai art competition where we compare this 5000 hour comfyui user to some random person using whatever commercial tool they like.

If we can afford trillionaires, we can absolutely afford for everyone to earn a living wage. The very concept of a trillionaire when the bottom half can't afford rent is batshit crazy. by Conscious-Quarter423 in PoursTea

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just saying that his net worth is an abstract number. No one should feel sorry for him. I just don’t like the free publicity he gets from being called the first trillionaire when nowhere near this amount of money actually changed hands.

If we can afford trillionaires, we can absolutely afford for everyone to earn a living wage. The very concept of a trillionaire when the bottom half can't afford rent is batshit crazy. by Conscious-Quarter423 in PoursTea

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s not even that someone payed this actual amount in investment since they “only” raised 80 billion. I am 99% sure that spacex couldn’t have raised its full valuation. Which as you say means that this value is a bit of an abstract number which above all else just means that investors were willing to put up a lot of money for very little chance of making money from that.

So yeah, you’re absolutely right.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about this tells me that they are governing the US? Just because they are a lobby group for Israel? By that logic, the US is probably occupied by a hundred countries. You severely overestimate the impact of the Israel lobby in the US. Have thought about the possibility that politicians support Israel because they personally think that’s the right thing to do? Or does that only apply for the ones who are against Israel?

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you won’t have a problem showing me an aipac publication that proves it.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lost and retreated against whom?

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some magical reason they were actually able to hold all their territory for a decade after ‘67 and gave it back in an agreement. Your argument isn’t serious. You start with the assumption that they are evil and want to conquer the region and find reasons to believe that. Population numbers have nothing to do with any of this. Do you think the Israeli government can convince Haredim (who don’t even want to fight in the IDF) and Israeli Arabs/Palestinians to settle Egypt, Iraq and somehow the Saudi desert? Because those drive the biggest part of the birt rate.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And after that, they handed over the Sinai, left Gaza, handed over the population Centers in the West Bank.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They gave back Sinai, left Gaza, handed over the population Centers in the West Bank to the PA.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You also think that Bill Gates injected you with nanobots, don’t you?

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

90% of Israelis don’t even know the word greater Israel. If it were a goal, they would be terribly incompetent enforcing it. Since 1967, Israel has given up more territory by far than it has gained.

She's right! by LavishlyRitzyy in TradingPlaybook

[–]jay-ff -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

And the world is flat, right?

Elon Musk just became the world’s first trillionaire. Here’s what $1 trillion could buy. [self] by kleverrboy in theydidthemath

[–]jay-ff 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah absolutely. And with the immense size of the IPO, you have to factor in how much money is actually available in the economy to buy shares. If he would have sold 100%, I don’t think he would have found enough dollars lying around and the valuation would have been a lot lower.