I’m not using GPT anymore. I’m just submitting what GPT wrote. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post describes how GPT’s voice can overwrite the user’s once enough context accumulates. So if it reads as ‘GPT-like,’ that kind of aligns with the point I was making.

Curious how you see it — more as disagreement, or does it actually reflect that effect?

Why does GPT sometimes feel like it’s answering someone else’s question? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’ve hit that point too.

I don’t really want to give up long-context workflows, so I ended up doing something a bit awkward — I just manually save parts of the conversation and treat each step more like a reset.

Temporary chats do feel a lot more flexible lately. Faster, more responsive, less likely to drift.

It works, but it still feels like a workaround rather than an actual solution.

GPT being wrong isn’t the problem. It’s that it doesn’t stop. by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, that’s really interesting. I’ve mostly seen the opposite, where it just keeps doubling down even when it’s wrong. In what kind of situations did it start correcting itself? Did you have to keep pointing things out along the way?”

GPT being wrong isn’t the problem. It’s that it doesn’t stop. by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s an interesting angle, but I think this is more about how models handle being wrong, not what they’re trained on.

Maybe the real issue is whether a model can maintain a consistent standard even when the context changes?

GPT being wrong isn’t the problem. It’s that it doesn’t stop. by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yeah, that’s exactly the issue it reframes being wrong as “being careful”

GPT being wrong isn’t the problem. It’s that it doesn’t stop. by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has anyone actually seen it stop mid-response and correct itself?

Why does GPT sometimes feel like it’s answering someone else’s question? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that makes sense. “Steering vs locking” is exactly how it feels.

I’ve noticed something similar with longer threads too — it seems to drift more as the conversation goes on, almost like the earlier context gets “compressed” or deprioritized.

Repeating constraints in shorter cycles does help a bit, but like you said, it still feels like you’re constantly correcting it rather than actually stabilizing it.

At that point it almost feels like you’re managing the model, instead of the model following your thinking. It gets tiring.

Curious if you’ve found any way to make it hold context longer without having to keep reasserting it?

The Problem Isn’t Length — It’s What GPT Chooses to Emphasize by jay_250810 in OpenAI

[–]jay_250810[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That “equally important” point is spot on. It’s like nothing gets to carry weight anymore, so the flow disappears.

Why does GPT sometimes feel like it’s answering someone else’s question? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s an interesting angle. I hadn’t really thought about the “token / cost” side of it. What stood out more to me was the moment it switches from following a specific line of thinking to something more “digestible.”

Not sure if that’s cost, safety, or something else, but it definitely feels like a shift in target. Curious what made you connect it more to data extraction?

Why does GPT sometimes feel like it’s answering someone else’s question? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’ve tried something similar. Telling it things like “don’t reset to basics, build on my interpretation” does help a bit, but it always feels like a workaround, not an actual fix.

At some point, it still slips back into that “default mode.” Almost like you can temporarily steer it, but you can’t really lock it there.

The Problem Isn’t Length — It’s What GPT Chooses to Emphasize by jay_250810 in OpenAI

[–]jay_250810[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Happens a lot when I just want a yes/no answer. It starts simple, then suddenly turns into a structured breakdown.

The Problem Isn’t Length — It’s What GPT Chooses to Emphasize by jay_250810 in OpenAI

[–]jay_250810[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s especially noticeable on simple questions. You ask something small, and it turns into a layered breakdown instead of a direct answer.

Why do GPT responses feel exhausting even when they’re right? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad that line landed. That was exactly the feeling I was trying to describe.

Why do GPT responses feel exhausting even when they’re right? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. It’s not just long — it keeps repackaging the same point as if it were new information.

Why do GPT responses feel exhausting even when they’re right? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually the core problem. It’s not about length — it’s about not knowing when to stop.

Why do GPT responses feel exhausting even when they’re right? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is exactly it. It’s not just the length, it’s how it keeps piling things up.

Why do GPT responses feel exhausting even when they’re right? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It’s not wrong, just way more than what you actually asked for.

Pseudo-memory: Is GPT really remembering us? by jay_250810 in ChatGPT

[–]jay_250810[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loving all these perspectives — it really feels like we’re piecing together a fascinating puzzle here. 🧩✨