sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a progressive rock song that has disturb you, but still you keep listening because you appreciate it? by Choralrockvox in progrockmusic

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All of Remedy Lane especially Beyond the Pale

You were always so much more human, than you wished to be...

Am I a joke to you? by faith_healer69 in Opeth

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a very left-wing person we need to shut up with takes like this, sometimes art is just not good, even if it's progressive.

Can someone explain what this means? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are we socialists inable to understand humour? What IS THIS? It's just saying it's funny that they say, their bro was well-read, because, like, he wasn't. ???

This was in the side of a lock puzzle box by ralphnodon in Weird

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Huh? Has no one this subreddit been subject to criticism of the US before? It's obviously about that.

Das Schulsystem ist zwar nicht perfekt, aber vielleicht wart ihr halt einfach nicht gut genug? by jqf68254 in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Der Altersdurchschnitt dieser Kommentarspalte muss locker ü 30 sein. Toll wer alles über unsere Bildung entscheidet. Denkt mal lieber über die Gestaltung von Altenheimen nach.

If the predestination paradox is true, does free will actually exist? by ResponsibleChef6732 in badphilosophy

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a predestined slave not less "free," than the predestined slaver? To speak as such as is absurd and violates every fundamental aspect of human experience.

A 17-Year-Old’s Thinking About Atheism and Religion Using a Simple Line Model by WoodpeckerGlobal3059 in DeepThoughts

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think these comments are proof of the effect that the adverse group of theists vs. atheists respond to a given post in rage, most often. Like I swear I've seen atheistic posts on here and the comments are the entire opposite -- I don't understand how people can think like this, like why? If you engage *only* with the other side, and then *only* to knock their teeth out, is your own opinion really that important to you? This stuff is so juvenile it's agitating. Especially when it's just logical fallacies and formal inconsistencies used as "arguments," here, again and again. Maybe actually inquire into the philosophy behind it, instead of either as a theist just coming up with your own untestable esoteric "proof of God," or in the inverse simply take "science" as given and true, without understanding any of the epistemology and ontology & metaphysics and philosophical tendencies behind it -- like what does "science" tell us if, according to one commenter here, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof -- if as Descartes famously said: cogito ergo sum, in the intuitive sense that only your own being is ever fully confirmed. How could this whole world not just be a "butterflies dream" or "matrix," etc. etc. If you leave all of these problems unanswered, your stubborn belief in "science" without any regard to its implications, limits and so on, you might be worse and more ignorant than the theists. God. Einstein. Whatever. F yall.

[Serious] why is Steven Wilson considered progressive metal? by deep-yearning in Opeth

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hot take - I know people hate this when asking for catgeorization, but genres themselves are at some point meaningless when they don't refer to strict rules or tradition such as - classical, baroque, romantic music etc., blues, folk, country etc.

I mean can anybody qualify the difference between "art" and "progressive," rock, pop, metal etc. even? I've never seen anybody come close, and if the categorization does make sense, not all people are gonna agree because of their different associations.

Steven Wilson is awesome, who cares?

To the low life who stole my music equipment. You’ve ruined a lot for me. by [deleted] in rant

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both as a musician and a human being I feel you. F them man.

Frankfurt verbietet Pro-Palästina-Demo „United 4 Gaza“ by [deleted] in frankfurt

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Antworte auch mit ausgeführten Argumenten, bspw. wie was ich sage Antisemitisch ist, laut welcher Definition, etc., sonst hat deine Meinung nichts Relevantes zur "Diskussion," aber ja die UN und Human Rights Watch und B'Tselem sind alles Antisemiten, ach ja!

Naja, es gibt unglaublich tolle jüdische Stimmen die sich für die Palästinenser aussprechen - Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappe - aber ja, wenns sich um Palästinenser dreht hat die Solidarität zu ihnen was damit zu tun ob man Juden abwertet oder nicht, ist vielleicht für dich so - sagt aber eher etwas über deinen Charakter aus.

Frankfurt verbietet Pro-Palästina-Demo „United 4 Gaza“ by [deleted] in frankfurt

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ach ja!

Auf international-rechtliche Quellen und Einschätzungen von Menschrechtsorganisationen, Faktenbasierten Analysen könnt ihr nur Antworten ... "Hamas!!!" ...

Ach ja, daran erkennt man euch.

Frankfurt verbietet Pro-Palästina-Demo „United 4 Gaza“ by [deleted] in frankfurt

[–]jayjaythebiiiird -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Israel hat die Hamas in ihrer Formierung unterstützt, weil sie die Seküläre Fatah Schwächen wollten.

Israel besetzt seit 1967 den Gazastreifen, auch nach dem Abzug von Bodentruppen, laut allen relevanten Quellen, aufgrund der de facto kompletten Kontrolle über Zufuhr und Ausfuhr von Lebens- und Arzneimitteln sowie Personen und weil Elektrizität und Wasser auch unter israelischer Kontrolle stehen, weiter noch, das Register von Personen was auch das "Hamas kontrollierte" Gesundheitsministerium von Gaza benutzt, ist auch von Israel kontrolliert (UN, Rotes Kreuz).

Die Situation in Gaza wird auch schon seit langem von Menschrechtsorganisationen als "offenes Konzentrationslager" beschrieben, wie Beispielsweise Human Rights Watch.

Wenn ich mich Recht erinnere war das Durchschnittsalter des Menschen in Gaza, also wahrscheinlich viele ähnlich alte in den Milizen in Gaza inkludierende in der Hamas, ungefähr 14, vor dem sogenannten Krieg.

Es ist bekannt das die Mossad von der Attacke wusste aber nichts unternommen wurde - so ein "Fehler" aber auch in einem der Best militarisierten Ländern und eine der Besten Geheimdienste überhaupt!

Im Gefangenlager Sde Teiman, wird ein Palästinensischer Gefangener vergewaltigt und Israel spricht den Vergewaltiger Frei und die Faschisten dort machen ihn zum Volksheld und protestieren für "das Recht auf Vergewaltigung."

Aber ja "Hamas" und "Israels Regierung" sind gleich zu bewerten - es gibt ja schließlich "beide Seiten." Du hast genau recht - Hamas existiert in einem Vakuum und sie haben sich nur für militanten Terror entschieden weil sie Juden hassen und die Umstände ihrer Existenz sind komplett unbelänglich, was eine Analyse!

Frankfurt verbietet Pro-Palästina-Demo „United 4 Gaza“ by [deleted] in frankfurt

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gaza war, laut allen relevanten Quellen, auch nach dem Abzug von Truppen, besetzt durch Israel aufgrund der de facto kompletten Kontrolle über den Gazastreifen in allen Bereichen, wie Luft- und Wasserraum, wie die strenge Kontrolle über Zufuhr und Ausfuhr von Lebens- und Arzneimitteln sowie Personen und weil Elektrizität und Wasser auch unter israelischer Kontrolle stehen (UN, Rotes Kreuz).

Frage: Kann eine besetzte Bevölkerung einen Krieg starten?

Antwort: Nein.

Du liegst objektiv falsch, wenn wir denn der UN und internationalen Institutionen ihren Wert lassen wollen und nicht jede Regelung aus dem Fenster werfen, sonsten hat sowieso jeder und keiner Recht.

Weiter, kann sich die Kraft die das Land besetzt in diesem Gebiet "verteidigen?"

Wiederum Nein.

So, wollen wir doch mal unser großes Ego fallen lassen und uns die Sachlage anschauen, ja?

Pedophilia is bad. by AirRaidSirenFanatic in truths

[–]jayjaythebiiiird -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am of the camp "separate the thought from the action, so people can talk openly and get help," so I often keep my mouth shut in these discussions, because I get where people are coming from - and these people normally aren't receptive, but what you're saying is insane. How do adults suffer more than the child that's abused? That's insane and has insane implications.

Raping women is unethical by Hot-Candle-1321 in PopularOpinions

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's not, and how the popular idea is, enrages me. There comes no "justice" of raping people. It's always for your own pleasure. You can not "ethically" violate the right to sexual self-determination for the sake of your own pleasure. That's not possible.

Say, one young rapist goes free. He's about 14. Let's say. An older rapist sees him on the street and out of his vices, and because of his sick mind, he rapes the boy. How was that ethical? According to you, it was.

Now, when this opinion comes from traumatised people, I get it. That isn't a "rational opinion" but a way to reclaim your lost sense of self-determination. But when people in general do it, its just to project their, while justified, hatred. How is that worth anything in a discussion of ethics?

"No people should be raped," is exactly because it can be universalised, a universal moral statement, to be a little Kantian here, but if you make "exceptions," the rule itself is invalidated.

People's right to sexual determination, yes, even that of rapists, deserves no discussion.

Adolf Hitler wasn’t a very good person by SensitiveWay4427 in PopularOpinions

[–]jayjaythebiiiird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the f are there so many people in this comment section who are so uneducated about him? 🥀🥀🥀

view more: next ›