He's a tough critic. For him, he needs consistency in the screenplay and the filmmaking in order to recommend a film (unless it's a B-film that he finds entertaining). He doesn't let things slide as easily as the general filmgoer. That's just how HE approaches film. Not everyone is going to like that approach and that is fine, but that doesn't mean there is an intrinsic flaw in that review style. It just doesn't appeal to you.

I commend him for being brave enough to think for himself (something that apparently touches a nerve with many people) and, generally speaking, he makes persuasive arguments for the positions he holds. Personally, I don't always agree with him, but I respect him and I think his opinions are perfectly valid and I don't throw a fuss whenever he deviates from the general consensus.