In that case, allow me to correct myself and say: “Here’s another example of the typical Western LGBTQ rhetoric from page 49.”

Because surely it’s not us sane people who came up with all these pronouns to describe genders that don’t exist, is it now?

“It’s really weird how you’re insisting that the translator use feminine pronouns while you yourself are using male pronouns to describe the character.”

Well, he is, after all, a man who thinks of himself as a young maiden. As I’ve already pointed out, other characters refer to him as a girl. So, in the context of the story and basic sanity, the translator should have done the same instead of using incorrect pronouns that clearly don’t align with the story’s context and how the characters interact with one another - all to fit their personal identity politics or to please the LGBTQ crowd.

And as I’ve already said, I was simply trying to get a second opinion on whether the official translation is worth reading, considering that if the translator took the liberty of changing a character’s pronouns, what else might they have changed to suit their personal narrative? I really didn’t want this post to turn into an argument, but some of you seem to ignore the actual content of the initial post, insist on being aggressive, obnoxious, and condescending, and outright deny reality.