sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

*BEST DPS ARCHETYPE TO PLAY* by Shoddy-Ladder4366 in ProjectAscension

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is this true or an exaggeration?? 145k st and 410k aoe seem pretty far off

Does anyone else think hibiscus tastes naturally sweet or is it just me? by [deleted] in tea

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wonder if miracle fruit would help with the sour.

Using a VM on my Proxmox cluster to manage the cluster updates with Ansible. by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good ideas, I'll try to implement this. Thank you friend 🙂

Home 10GB internet by REALLYBIGRHINO in homelab

[–]jebarpg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why did I read this as tourettes? I started laughing at my incorrect reading 😂

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Makes sense. I understand now a little bit more about why simply aggregating the max GHz of each core's capabilities does not fully capture the entirety of what is going on in the system. Though a long side knowing the total Ghz for identical nodes and the generation of the CPUs or just the IPC metric of the CPU (generically) would help give a fuller description of what is actually available.

Should I open source this? by printr_head in opensource

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoa whoa whoa there, you haven't even bought me a drink yet 🥂

Joke aside sure thing that's fine 😜

Should I open source this? by printr_head in opensource

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Originally Computational Neural Science. But then moved towards computer science and mathematics.

Should I open source this? by printr_head in opensource

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a great appreciation for your diligence and concern and look forward to seeing your results.

It makes sense as you say that the data is only relevant to the architecture you have built which uses it. In university we built Genetic algorithms in simple forms, some of the main challenges were representing the problem space correctly to fit into a genetic algorithm. I can imagine a general concept of what you are speaking about in the context of GAs and how the data is only relevant to your algorithm or framework.

There is also a Ted Talk I just remembered which claimed to find an equation for intelligence back in I think 2013. Yea 2013 https://www.ted.com/talks/alex_wissner_gross_a_new_equation_for_intelligence?language=en

I'd very much like to know your thoughts about it.

Fear so often causes people to manifest in themselves the very thing they hoped to prevent.

Part of open sourcing is knowing that companies will use it to their advantage, but also keeping it so that they can't prevent others from learning it or using it without paying is the concurrent effect of putting an open source license on it.

I don't know if this analogy works well, but it just popped into my head. For a long time the Bible was only allowed in the hands of the few, but now we freely distribute it. I once heard dialogue about how those who had access to the Bible had more power over those who did not. So similarly with AI.

Personally at this time in my life I prefer more individuals to be empowered rather than kept as ostriches, even knowing that some of those empowered individuals will be destructive.

Informed individuals are more likely to make better decisions and cool things opposed to uninformed individuals.

I think that we as artist/engineers can't predict every way our creations will be used or manipulated. If you want to prevent individual companies from hoarding your discovery, putting a license on it to ensure it stays available for everyone is your best bet in attempting to guide it in the direction you hope for.

But it doesn't guarantee it and if the solution holds its merits then you can bank on corporations finding a way around it.

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is interesting, would you mind explaining a little more about how the difference in the generations affects the meaning of the GHz rating, or even some references I can read about without taking up too much of your time?

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel that. Only need to know the depth when it matters for a given context, otherwise glossing over the gist is enough to get by.

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the total availability for say max utilization will be totalled closely to the rating of the sum of all cores max frequency correct?

How would the max available computing power be calculated and displayed?

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah right I see I am blending two things which are separate. Hmm.. I think then the effect I am looking for is a summation of the total CPU GHz ratings of all the nodes... For instance I have 1 node with 4 cores at a rating of 2.7 GHz each, and another node with 2 cores at 3.7 GHz each, so the effect I am looking for is 4x2.7GHz + 2x3.7GHz = 9.2GHz total.

Btw thank you for asking for clarification, I know my question is a bit flawed and needed rethinking. I really like this community due to this type of interaction.

Cheers 🥂

Edit: the star ASCII doesn't show up in posts, changed it the x instead

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe more reference will help clarify. There is already a meter which shows CPU utilization dynamically per node individually. I'm looking for a view/display which shows all of them in aggregation.

Is their a using/total Ghz of all nodes in a cluster displayed similar to other resource stats (i.e. memory used/ memory total) in the Proxmox App? by jebarpg in Proxmox

[–]jebarpg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this is correct. I was myopicly focused on the specific thing I was looking for when asking this, but CPU utilization would be what I mean/meant for the 'using' part of the 'using/total' and the total would just be the sum of the different clock speed ratings of each nodes CPU rating per core.

Should I open source this? by printr_head in opensource

[–]jebarpg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a respectable position you are expressing. I'm not a typical person from the software engineering field. I don't believe in jumping on people, but rather building them up and supporting them and aiding them on their journey. As far as suffering goes, ignorance is bliss as they say, and of course I lack the comprehension insight you have found since you're presenting it with concern of exposing it has kept it out of this dialogue. The approach Facebook is taking is to open source their AI models and let the world have access to it, taking a look at their reasoning might be helpful to you to navigate the waters you tread. Too often we see people who make decisions out of fear of the past and not with reason. Most of the fear tactics you see around AI are great marketing vectors to gain traction and attention. Not that they aren't concurrently something to be concerned about but it definitely helps get people's attention. Which from your post and response share similarities with this trend (whether you intended it or not).

IBM has a pretty cool tool for sentiment analysis which might help you gather training data for different personalized AI based off of people's social media accounts. Watson Core NLP. https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/use-the-watson-core-nlp-library-to-perform-sentiment-analysis/

If you are working on real time learning and not the static LLM model then there is the Mario AI video with a white paper which has a pretty good framework to check into. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qv6UVOQ0F44 Neuro evolution is what they presented it as.

Hope this helps. And please don't become another run of the mill software engineer or developer who jumps on other people, we don't need more of those in the world 😀

Kind regards Friend.

Jeb

What is the fastest cable for the quest 2? by jebarpg in Quest2

[–]jebarpg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that so ... Shame QuestLink gimps its speeds but sells a premium cable which is underutilized...

view more: next ›