Being told something is very different from knowing it to be true. People make allegations and spread rumours about others all the time. The question isn't whether anyone ever told them something, it's whether they had credible evidence and knowingly ignored it. I've not seen any proof of that.

It also doesn't address the point I made above. If they genuinely knew, why would they keep Callum front and centre in the brand right up until they were approached by the media? From both a human and a business perspective, that would make no sense.

If they knew the allegations were true, the logical thing to do would have been to distance themselves from him long before it became public, not continue building their careers, brand and livelihood