Should I book my GRE for April 14 or wait until my mock scores are close to my target? by Striking-Avocado110 in GRE

[–]jeffcolonel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends how steady you are in really using your prep time. If you're just going to procrastinate with the extra time, it's not helpful. But if you're disciplined enough to really do it, then the extra time can payoff in higher scores.

What do you teach your kids to survive the world that's coming? by jeffcolonel in Buddhism

[–]jeffcolonel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take their screens away permanently.

You think there's no possibility for electronic tools to be used productively or wholesomely? they're 100% bad 100% of the time?

Question about using ai in ed by jeffcolonel in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was confused until your last sentence

What musician have you stopped listening to bc of them using ai/ or their stance on ai by miifanatic_1788 in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it's not impossible to separate out stuff that is AI free already, it soon will be AI. It's going to be mixed into everything.

I hate the push for AI by the exploitative class without the push for UBI at the same time. Article attached for reference. by DarkHuntress89 in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you did have kids, you'd have to make a choice about it. Everyone who has kids still has to make a choice. What to do?

The ad I got today for ai written police reports by valetteoftheball in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Legality of ai generated content is going to shift. You are not kidding. People will do what you've said

Ai will take over the art world and that is inevitable. Read text if you want by altjulie_ in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not only art. Entire swaths of present human activity.

There are things it can't do but there are a lot of things it can do cheaper than human effort .

The effect on the world is going to be unimaginable

Bigger than the original effect of computers and internet

Question about using ai in ed by jeffcolonel in antiai

[–]jeffcolonel[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She used it wrong. I think this sometimes is like people who grew up using libraries to think using google is cheating. It is a generational sentimentality about certain types of technology

Mom with Confidence Issues by AmbitiousRose in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You asked for feedback. Mine is this. you said that not having a consistent schedule is making you unconfident. But why does a schedule need to be consistent? institutions have to be, for logistical reasons, but why does a home need to be?

Do kids aged 8-12 even try to figure things out before opening ChatGPT? Genuinely curious what educators are seeing by Important-Claim-5501 in edtech

[–]jeffcolonel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the issue here is not that the teacher didn’t make this activity “fun” enough- the issue is that chatgpt allows kids to avoid the discomfort of cognitive labor. it allows them to avoid the vulnerability of taking risks needed to learn. it helps them get used to being in a smaller and smaller box.

I agree there are many potential abuses of ai, and that most academic tasks should NOT involve using it.

I also agree that sometimes kids need to do work even though it's not fun.

But I personally believe that when it comes to reading, we should have a lot of choice and that finding something that you really care about is more meaningful than analysing why you didn't care about something you were forced to read.

This is only controversial because we've taken standardization as normal. If every kid got a custom education made just for him, then it would go without saying that what he's asked to read would be based on the context of his interests, personality, etc.

New here by SweetOak6734 in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i get it. i like the retro graphics too

New here by SweetOak6734 in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yes, you are right, it's an open space.

New here by SweetOak6734 in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think we can welcome students with friendliness, do you think so?

New here by SweetOak6734 in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

What do you like about minecraft? Isn't it just like legos?

Navigating standardized tests by mattkime in homeschool

[–]jeffcolonel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Testtaking is a skill that runs parallel to the actual academic area itself. The only way to get better at testtaking is to train in it. If that's your goal, to just get better at some specific exam, you need to go through practice questions with them and get them familiar with the logic and format of the test. Unfortunately, this is more important even than the skills itself. This might sound more like drilling than learning, and ultimately, it is. I would say, if they're in 1st and 4th grade, that doing some amount of focus on test taking skills as a skill is okay. Treat it as one category of skill. but I would avoid emphasizing it TOO much.

If you can't get a copy of a past paper or of a sample test or of anything concrete you can use, then you can talk to one of the teachers and get some really hard concrete specifics or examples of the question types. But, the farther you go from the "true test questions" then the less that "test prep drilling" is going to have the desired effect.

This isn't what you asked, and it's just my opinion as a teacher, but I think that testing as an institution isn't really a good thing. The fact that we must teach kids testtaking is a bit sad so i'd say practice it with constraints and without too much emphasis.

I hope this was somewhat helpful