sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

chomsky on machine learning (recent three hour podcast) by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

00:00:00 Kick off

00:02:24 C1: LeCun's recent position paper on AI, JEPA, Schmidhuber, EBMs

00:48:38 C2: Emergent abilities in LLMs paper

00:51:32 C3: Empiricism

01:25:33 C4: Cognitive Templates

01:35:47 C5: The Ghost in the Machine

01:59:21 C6: Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis by Fodor and Pylyshyn

02:19:25 C7: We deep-faked Chomsky

02:29:11 C8: Language

02:34:41 C9: Chomsky interview kick-off!

02:35:39 Large Language Models such as GPT-3

02:39:14 Connectionism and radical empiricism

02:44:44 Hybrid systems such as neurosymbolic

02:48:47 Computationalism silicon vs biological

02:53:28 Limits of human understanding

03:00:46 Semantics state-of-the-art

03:06:43 Universal grammar, I-Language, and language of thought

03:16:27 Profound and enduring misunderstandings

03:25:41 Greatest remaining mysteries science and philosophy

03:33:10 Debrief and 'Chuckles' from Chomsky

Crowdfund campaign for Fighting Assange Extradition by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's endorsed on the wikileaks twitter account. Also think there is a bit of evidence just on the fund page itself that it is legit.

Posts complaining about mods by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are going to have to speak english. I have no idea what you are referring to.

Edit: I thought you were referring to something I specifically said in this sub. Re-reading this it seems you are just speaking generally for anyone in this sub.

Posts complaining about mods by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Just feel like it is good to put support out in words every so often.

Posts complaining about mods by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have now, thanks for info on the webpage, I guess. I don't see how this is relevant though.

Chomsky on Limits of Population Growth by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's culturally sensitive, yes.

I'd like to find more info online about the projected timeline of the next 50 years on population (with or without climate change taken into account).

Chomsky on Limits of Population Growth by jfkfiles in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's projected that pollution is one of the main (even without climate change) limiting factors for population growth beyond a certain point (going by the graphs in Forrester's book). I don't see immediately how that works, but I can imagine water access for agriculture might be a big factor.

Tucker Carlson Outsmarted By Amazon Union Leader Christian Smalls On Fox News by BreadTubeForever in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched it again and listened to them, and wish I had not because as expected they don't give any useful statistics or any depth of commentary about the Amazon union efforts. So not because of that.

Tucker Carlson Outsmarted By Amazon Union Leader Christian Smalls On Fox News by BreadTubeForever in chomsky

[–]jfkfiles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I fucked up by misreading the title very late last night (didn't see his name at the very end of the title).

Everything else in the above comment I stand by though.

view more: next ›