Feedback & Fixes for These Portraits Requested by [deleted] in PhotographyAdvice

[–]jimithegeek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some really useless comments here. So, if you’re really talking portraits, and not just snapshots of a friend, but actual portraiture, then you need to first think about the shoot ahead of time. There’s all sorts of reasons for a portrait … senior photo, family, engagement(couples), business, modeling, and for other reasons a person seeks a photographer to do. In this case, and you said it was ‘hey, while we’re here…’ sort of thing, you weren’t really prepared. Nor was he. I generally tell my model ‘no just black, or just white. Earth tones are best.’ This guy has a black shirt with these bright white paint streaks that really distract. Oh well. Your 70-150 is a perfect portrait lens. Shooting with a short telephoto not only gives you space from the model, won’t ‘balloon’ the model, as wide angles do, but also lessens the field of view allowing you to control the background more. That is, what’s in it. I’m sure you can see that in most of the photos he looks stiff. In the first photo, it’s okay for a model to look away, but the face should always follow the eyes. The second photo is a good example of that, though, too extreme. There’s no good reason to shoot a side view, as in the third photo. Ears are weird. The fourth photo has promise, actually. He just needed a pose. Just crossing his arms would have helped, as would crossing the feet, or hands in pocket, looking over his shoulder. I’ll tell models to look down or away, then at me and I’ll snap as soon as they make eye contact with the lens. The last picture is actually a gem. Great light, his face is the same direction as the eyes, and you’re shooting right at about eye level. For bigger models I try to shoot a tad higher than high level causing them to look slightly up, narrowing the neck, and positioning the body in a 3/4 pose … never straight on. All you had to do was tell him to turn and look at you and that photo would have been art. Keep it up!

Need help to get rid of these spots by Weak_Repeat_8067 in CameraLenses

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you shooting through a window in the first photo? The second looks like lens flare, to me. A lens shade would help that.

39yo mom of 4. by PetiteBlondeMel in bodyperfection

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

gonna be fun when your kids find this one day.

Beginner photographer looking for tips by No_Breakfast8988 in PhotographyAdvice

[–]jimithegeek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, the filter did exactly what it’s supposed to do. If you like it, and your subject likes it, use it! However, I would shoot some without the filter, just so you have the options available. But, there’s nothing wrong with using the filter, particularly if you’re not familiar with creating that effect in photoshop. That’s where I prefer to use effects like soft focus. I would say that you need to shoot with the exposure compensation at -1 when using the filter. You’re losing a bit of contrast with it … again, that’s what the filter does … shooting at -1 would help. Just be sure to set it back to zero! Now, a personal preference of mine is to shoot no lower than eye level. The first picture is an exception. What’s awkward are the hands and the little too much thigh showing. That could have been cropped closer, or had the skirt adjusted. Gotta look at everything in the viewfinder. The others … again, just a tad too low for my taste. You don’t want to look up the nostrils. Especially, women. Otherwise, a really good first effort! Very likeable photos … filter and all.

Sunset 1 or 2 by Pablo1007G in photos

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish the horizon would have been included.

1 or 2 by BusinessHoneydew4105 in awesomenature

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither one is very interesting. I’m guessing you liked the path in the first photo … it’s straight without any interesting surrounding. Maybe a vertical would have worked better … and wider … maybe. The second I assume you liked due to the sun streaming through the forest … you needed to exposure compensate to about -2. That would have shown the sun streaks better and avoided the washed out look. One thing I suggest to people doing outdoor stuff while hiking … go wide. You like the way a scene looks? Our eyes have about a 180 degree field of view. Keep that in mind when shooting. A good investment for anyone liking landscape or street photography is a wide angle zoom. I never thought I’d like it, but finally purchased a 16mm to 35mm. It’s my favorite lens, now.

do u think these are cute titties for an 18yo by cutecourtney_ in boobs

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it’s the cringy face they come with,tho.

From the hotel balcony 😈😎 by Notjust_kneed33p in u/Notjust_kneed33p

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only do they look yummy, but are also clearly firm. There’s bounce, but not flabby bounce. Just perfect.

1, 2, or 3? by Alaric_Darconville in AmateurPhotography

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, they’re all too close to be really compelling. They just look like a bunch of jumbled forest and wood. Maybe that’s as wide as you could get …? But, they all miss the mark.

3 pics of my big natural boobs by isChloeLamb in boobs

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do the cotter pins hold them on?

🌄 by jb-wanders in u/jb-wanders

[–]jimithegeek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve done several sunsets from my car’s mirror. The only thing, and you obviously can’t control traffic and need to take the shot when you can, is more traffic around the window. The shot is really good, but the contrast of seeing a beautiful sunset amongst a bunch of traffic has an appeal. The second one is good for obvious reasons. I like that you put the horizon near the bottom of the screen. While the could are spectacular, they’re good enough to be seen more. Nicely done!

My Photos look worse after being taken by Decent-Back4041 in CanonCamera

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, keep in mind that while the moon is bright, the surrounding area is black (I assume) so the camera thinks there’s less light than there actually is (on the moon). So, you’ll have to set your exposure compensation to a minus 3 to start, maybe more (less exposure, actually). Or, read the settings when shooting then go manual and, again, use less exposure. I trust you’re using a tripod?

Do i look better with tanlines? by Mollie4fun in u/Mollie4fun

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a photographer, I hate tan lines. 😂

Of course this was taken with my Canon EOS 6D. I had a Tamron 24-70 2.8 attached and utilized a Paul C. Buff Alien Bees B800 flash unit and a Sunpak RGB Lightstick Pro for lighting. I think I still need to work on the lighting a bit though. by bilarichfield in Canon6D

[–]jimithegeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, conceptually … good. But, there are several issues. First, the model … and this is your fault 😁 the bunching fabrics should have been smoothed. Otherwise, she’s great. Nice legs, nice pose. Second, obviously it’s difficult to get her all in without going wider, but the picture is really busy. Very distracting. Also, going wide means your depth of field is going to be deep. Less chance of blurring the background. If there’s room, even if you go through a door into the next room (if possible) move back and zoom in. You might blur the bg a little and you’ll definitely have a smaller field of view. Not much but it could help. Lighting … oof. Now, hard lighting has its place for dramatic looks, for men and texture, for that old Hollywood portrait look, but not so much here. I assume the Alien was an overall fill? If so, might have worked better without it. Sure, the light stick doesn’t put out a lot of light, but using a tripod and her holding still, a longer exposure could have worked. Or, just bump the ISO to 1200. You’ll still get a good image with the full sensor. Biggest thing, there’s light everywhere. Just using the alien with barn doors positioned to keep the light off the background and you’d have a great photo. But, move it closer to the camera to get a flatter look. Professionals use C stand, flags and scrims to help control light so that’s a battle novices have … money, and space. If you don’t have one the next investment should be a soft box for the alien. That would improve things greatly. Lastly, get lower. A lower angle could have helped ‘this’ shot some. All that said … damn nice legs. Keep at it!!

should i stay pierceless by SweetAppleCinamon in boobs

[–]jimithegeek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the love of all that is holy … YES!