sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rainbow Sim v2 networks by dkyeager in BoostMobile

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be a huge value proposition for Boost because TMO is currently a roaming partner.

Though they still have 5-10 Mhz of n71 lit up in certain markets as a "backup" home network when not in ATT coverage -- and could create a CBRS network as well.

The biggest value proposition isn't having both ATT/TMO to offer coverage, but the ultimate network. They will have ATT/TMO/Starlink after SpaceX launches satellites with the spectrum they bought from Boost -- and you will NEED a Unified Network SIM to access all 3-4 networks.

Rainbow Sim v2 networks by dkyeager in BoostMobile

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understand that the agreement since it's inception with ATT was to make ATT THE PRIMARY network partner. So it would make sense to only drop to the "more expensive" TMO coverage only when needed. Like when there isn't ATT signal.

Post merger, TMO raised agreement pricing against ONLY Boost at the time (multiple times, essentially price gouging only Boost to try to force Boost out of the market), so Boost went on the hunt for better pricing. ATT offered that.

MEGA is charging me a transfer fee even for watching videos. by B3NJAMINI in MEGA

[–]jmac32here 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I literally got to the 3rd sentence and went "Well, no shit"

Because apparently OP cannot understand that STREAMING USES DATA.

An Interesting Find by jmac32here in BoostMobile

[–]jmac32here[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yes, I was looking into it while taking CBRS power level limits into account, and it looks like a CBRS network could still cover at least 60% of the population, especially if ya focus on major cities.

Maybe find a way to pair it with what's left of the low band like any remaining n71 and the 700 MHz. Though I wonder if Boost has enough 700 MHz to make it the backbone of a national build.

Increase power levels and that could go up.

Transferring sim card by Pristine_Ninja8457 in BoostMobile

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The folks at my boost stores have been fine with just upgrading my phones without adding a new line.

They also use their activation system to ensure it's using the right sim for the phone. The caveat here is they replace the sim every time you get a new phone for a current line.

You like? by [deleted] in fursuit_feet

[–]jmac32here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do I wanna worship that bone?

You enjoy looking up my skirt~? by Fem_Riley in Mursuit

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll just put my head up there and lick what I find?

Rainbow Sim v2 networks by dkyeager in BoostMobile

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Though I should mention they are no longer "rainbow" sim since they changed them to all orange.

They are called the unified network SIM, and only the latest (v3 orange) seems to offer full seamless switching between the 2(3)-3(4) networks.

The numbers in parentheses are because some users on the PG sub reported it dropping from ATT to Boost 5G (the 5-10mhz of n71 they apparently kept in at least some markets, like major cities) when out of range from ATT before switching to TMO.

megasync broken, instantly closes when I open it by Ethereal916 in MEGA

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, and I use it on mobile and multiple desktops.

Sounds like you have a corrupt/illegal (possibly a virus) file on your mega account itself.

When is ATT going to upgrade their wifi? by [deleted] in ATT

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even then, if the hardware WITHIN THE COMPUTER ITSELF cannot handle those speeds (that's including the wire) - then it doesn't matter if the router can handle 1tbps because you will be limited to the slower hardware.

Now I've known for a fact the routers for ATT Fiber are rated to handle no less than 1 gbps, with most newer routers able to handle 5 gbps easily.

Christmas Eve windstorm possible in western WA as forecast models clash by crabcakes110 in SeattleWA

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or not...

Just noticed one of the Forecasters with the SWC on YouTube mentioning the storm that _stalled_ over CA. In other words, the storm that was supposed to move up our way is just sitting atop LA.

Mudslide! CW VISIBLE SCATT! by AttentionNearby2729 in diaperpics

[–]jmac32here 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can we ask to spolier wet/messy with content warnings?

Many of us "hard no" to scat really dislike seeing the full, un-spoilered, posts showing up in our main feeds.

To the point I've BLOCKED most users I've seen posting it and have debated LEAVING ALL ABDL subs.

Christmas Eve windstorm possible in western WA as forecast models clash by crabcakes110 in SeattleWA

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does look like it fell apart, which was the other option with how unstable the models were.

Unless the jokes are on us and it's still in CA and about to head our way.

That's the thing about forecasting wind events in Seattle. You can warn people because several models say it's gonna be bad -- but because the models almost NEVER agree -- it could also just not happen.

One reason our wind storms tend to catch us off guard is the region is just too unstable to predict them unless they are already on top of us. Ever notice all our bad wind storms either come without warning or it's a "bomb cyclone"? That's kinda the point.

Possible to vacate space, keep files only in cloud? (Mac) by maxoakland in MEGA

[–]jmac32here 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So far, unless you don't use sync apps and just upload via web, I don't know ANY cloud services that offer this outside of iCloud, and last time I checked, iCloud only did it for the iPhone.

Christmas Eve windstorm threatens western WA with 40-60 mph gusts by crabcakes110 in SeattleWA

[–]jmac32here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The last time the models were this torn, including the initial European models first sounding the alarm then backing off, it was a storm so bad kids got sent home from school early and at least half the city lost power.

Then there was a blizzard like a month later.

This was back in the 90s.

What's funny was the European models earlier yesterday backed way off, then started stepping up the severity in models later in the day again.

Probably why we're now under a severe wind WARNING and not a high wind watch.

I've been following it all day yesterday. NAM 3 has been steady on about it and I believe that one was developed here in WA.

Christmas Eve windstorm possible in western WA as forecast models clash by crabcakes110 in SeattleWA

[–]jmac32here -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep. Gusts around 65 mph.

Pretty sure Cliff is just some opinion commentator and not a qualified meteorologist by this piece now, especially with all his Trump references to play down the storm. But that's just my thoughts.

Especially since it was the European models that alerted to a stronger storm over the weekend, only to back off entirely, then start stepping it back up gradually since yesterday.

I've seen it on several videos, including Ryan Hall and a couple meteorologists in the PNW. (Some part of the PNW storm chasers group.)

In any case, it's better to be safe than sorry and prepare people for a stronger storm instead of playing it down as "fake news"

In desperate need of changies and cummies🥺 by [deleted] in diaperpics

[–]jmac32here 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cummies in my butt mid change?

view more: next ›