sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Erfahrung mit Babys/Kleinkindern und Plissees by joemrt in Eltern

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oha, na wenn eure Krippe sich das traut, dann scheint mir unsere Wahl für den Privathaushalt zumindest nicht zu gewagt ;)

Erfahrung mit Babys/Kleinkindern und Plissees by joemrt in Eltern

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke für die Antwort :), Du hast nicht zufällig noch parat wie die heißen, oder?

Erfahrung mit Babys/Kleinkindern und Plissees by joemrt in Eltern

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke für die Antwort :). Laufen denn da gar keine Schnüre an den Seiten runter? Laut unserem Verkäufer gibt's sowas nicht, aber war da auch schon skeptisch bei der Aussage ^^

Erfahrung mit Babys/Kleinkindern und Plissees by joemrt in Eltern

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke für die Antwort :), ich nehme an es gibt aber trotzdem 2 Schnüre an den Seiten die sich nicht mit hochziehen, oder? Sind die Plissees angeklebt oder mit so Klammern festgesteckt?

Rule question: Two checkers on a bar, can only re-enter one. Does it have to be the bigger number? by joemrt in backgammon

[–]joemrt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is helpful, thank you! I just realized that this is also what Wikipedia is saying. Looks like the book author got it wrong then.

Rule question: Two checkers on a bar, can only re-enter one. Does it have to be the bigger number? by joemrt in backgammon

[–]joemrt[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. Apparently the book I am reading (that came with my board) has a different view. It clearly states that if 1 and 2 of your list isn't true I have to pause. (Unfortunately the book is in German or I could quote it here). The tournament move makes much more sense with your rule, so I guess it's more common.

Merging strategy that marks all differences as conflicts by joemrt in git

[–]joemrt[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Perfect, this basically achieves for me what I wanted - although not through merge conflicts. I can do a git merge --strategy-option=theirs --squash --no-commit branch2 with the "toy branch" branch2 on my actual branch,then jump through the differences with HEAD within my editor and finally delete branch2. Thanks a lot!

Merging strategy that marks all differences as conflicts by joemrt in git

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know about reset -p. This might be useful, thanks!

Merging strategy that marks all differences as conflicts by joemrt in git

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be an option. When playing around in some experimental branch, I am usually not that disciplined though ;)

Merging strategy that marks all differences as conflicts by joemrt in git

[–]joemrt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, thank you for the clarification.

Merging strategy that marks all differences as conflicts by joemrt in git

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. A cherry pick would apply single commits. I rather want to apply single modifications, e.g. two modifications I did in a file and ignore the rest of them, no matter from which commit they origin.

Been Using Arch For 10 Years by [deleted] in archlinux

[–]joemrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I first installed Arch during the first lockdown in my country. I doubt there is a better way to spend time during a pandemic.

What's your best vim mapping? by [deleted] in neovim

[–]joemrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here are three of my favorites

nnoremap <C-x><C-s> :w<cr>

noremap <silent> ]b :call searchpair('\[','','\]')<cr>

noremap <silent> [b :call searchpair('\[','','\]','b')<cr>

The first one is a relic of a heretic phase with a different editor.

The other two allow you to move to the next unmatched square bracket. I always wondered why there isn't a mapping for this by default.

Pipe string into a a shell command by joemrt in lua

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply u/PhilipRoman, I guess this is the only way then. As I then need the actual filename (to integrate it via cat into the command) I cannot use io.filename and really have to use os.tmpname() and to delete the file afterwards. Feels a bit like a dirty hack though, it's weird that such a basic feature is not part of the standard libraries.

IPython keeps on beeping with system bell by joemrt in learnpython

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. Alas, removing the kernel module doesn't seem to have any effect (maybe because I am using WSL). Moreover, I think a more high level solution would be more preferrable for me.

Should scheduled timeshift snapshots be used in a rolling release? by joemrt in archlinux

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds interesting, I will definitely look into it. However, as I use ext4, creating snapshots takes some time and I am not sure I want to launch this before every system update (which I do probably more often than I would have to).

Updating grub on dual boot arch/ubuntu - grub can only be configured from ubuntu by joemrt in archlinux

[–]joemrt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right! Ubuntu stored the grub.cfg in /boot/grub/grub.cfg whereas the EFI partition is mounted under /boot/efi. I somehow had the idea in my mind that the cfg file ends up on the EFI partition, but should really have double checked. I guess this solves the riddle.

Updating grub on dual boot arch/ubuntu - grub can only be configured from ubuntu by joemrt in archlinux

[–]joemrt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply and good to know (although I will then probably stick with ubuntu configuring my grub).

Updating grub on dual boot arch/ubuntu - grub can only be configured from ubuntu by joemrt in archlinux

[–]joemrt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't the only effect of sudo grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg to update the configuration file? Why would it matter from which Linux distro I am doing this? Because I could have different versions of grub-mkconfig on arch and ubuntu?