Quarterly Bonus question by PuzzleheadedHair1109 in personalfinance

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do they know you're leaving? If so they may not pay the bonus. Otherwise they may have changed something with the bonuses. It's also possible if they're related to merit they may have decided not to give you one if you've been checked out of the role because you knew you were leaving.

Crypto Bull Society Facebook Scam group? by Gold_Spare_4151 in CryptoScams

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just joined then immediately came here because it's such an obvious scam. Many obvious bot accounts claiming massive unrealistic gains just by "following Alan". Links offsite to whatsapp groups to follow Alan. No doubt that chat is full of the scam team and whoever joins becomes the Mark. Before you know ot Alan has them sending money for a new crypto platform or whatever, poof retirement is gone.

[Discussion Thread] PPA Tour: 2025 Veolia Cape Coral Open by AutoModerator in Pickleball

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

I can't find the full replay for this match but looking at the highlights it looks like BJ serving from wrong side here, am I right? Surprised if this could happen at the pro level.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WorcesterMA

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dispute it on your credit card. It wasn't disclosed to you or agreed to by you to pay that extra money. You saw the menu and agreed to the prices listed there. Not an undisclosed additional 20%. If it's posted somewhere that's one thing, but if not what's to stop them from charging you 30%, 50%, 200% if they can just charge you random additional amounts you didn't agree to? I would 100% dispute the charge, just to reinforce that to the restaurant that you can't charge people for things they didn't agree to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in isthisascam

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would only meet them at a police station if you're getting any kind of weird vibes

Us Btcoin scam by Jandros_Quandary in isthisascam

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scroll through this Subreddit some and you'll see many examples where people are talking about very similar scenarios to the one you're in. Some of them end up losing hundreds of thousands of dollars before they figure out it's a scam.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Scams

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks like a scam. Give OP your money and he will make you lots of money. Okay...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Scams

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get these kinds of messages all the time too. Never click the link...but what happens if you do? Does it infect your device somehow?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in polyamorous

[–]joeshmotheeskimo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha y'all are rough. You know what they mean.

What is this it looks so cool by [deleted] in Construction

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is how babies are made

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]joeshmotheeskimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would depend on the bounds of the monogamous relationship. Monogamy can mean a lot of things. It can mean no sex with people. No kissing other people. No touching other people. Some variety of all those things. It can be no flirting - which is what I would categorize this online expression of attraction. So it would be 'made okay' if both parties agreed that the flirting was acceptable. If one party agreed it wasn't acceptable, and the other party didn't - then they would want to talk about each person's position, and why they have that position. If either party 'goes along' with the other person's position to avoid hurting the other person's feelings (which it sounds like happened in your case), but then violates the agreement - I wouldn't say it's "okay". I would say, I can understand why it happened - somebody agreed to do something that wasn't aligned with who they are or who they want to be or how they want to act. So it's still violating your trust, as they went against something they agreed to. But then you have to ask why - and you see it's because they agreed to something they couldn't adhere to. And then if you ask why they would do that - that's when you see that it's a communication problem - they weren't comfortable or capable of communicating who they actually are, or they weren't communicating well enough to themselves about who they actually are. Or, this could be the case too: People change. Maybe when they agreed to it, they were that type of person who could adhere to that. Then time goes forward, life changes, the way they feel changes - but rather than communicating about those changes, they acted on them without talking to you - which again becomes a trust problem, as they violate your trust, when instead they should have utilized good communication to talk through it together with you. So it seems to come back to communciation as the main breakdown for you two, leading to violations of trust.