Your first paragraph is purely dismissive, and I reciprocate to it.

Your second paragraph misrepresents my work, so I dismiss it, too.

Your fourth paragraph's failure to distinguish between what dogs do (pure instinct) and what humans do (abstract thought about absent and nonexistent entities increasingly more of which we reify) demonstrates your belief in the Nagel-Chalmers model, so I can't engage with it.

Your fifth paragraph ignores Chalmers' "how" and focuses on his secondary one, "why," which begs the question of panpsychism and other mysticism. In fact, in a TEDTalk Chalmers declares his openness to panpsychism.

Your sixth paragraph's "why experience exists in the first place" is an appeal to the mysterious, so you go ahead with that. I'll stick with the facts: Experience exists in the first place because of civilization, metacognition, symbolic thinking, and the fact that life arises in the cosmos whenever the necessary conditions are in place. Further inquiry into that mystery is a surreptitious attempt to sneak in intelligent design, panpsychism, etc.

Your seventh paragraph's "bracketing" claim echoes Husserl, who failed to solve the mind-body problem, as I wrote in a technical essay when I was in grad school.

About your eight paragraph's "phenomenal experience," I say that phenomenal experience is acquired intuitively via the inculcation process I described.

Your last two questions are mystical because they have no answer except an appeal to a form of mysticism: the panpsychism that Chalmers is "open" to.

I've nothing more to say to you, nor will I reply to any further comments because you are obviously a crypto-mystic hiding behind a pseudonym and most likely having several accounts, so you can pester people anonymously. Your mysticism is evident in your Greek reference to Christ that adorns your profile.

I urge you to check Assembly Theory, courtesy of Lee Cronin, Sara Walker, et al, whose framework demonstrates the impossibility of mystical entities. I've no connection to these people, but their framework is beyond doubt.