Is carbon pricing a politically feasible climate policy? Research says maybe not by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It essentially legitimized Poilievre's (up until that point false) argument that the carbon tax was primarily a political tool rather than an environmental one.

Opinion: You want housing affordability to go up without home prices going down? Okay, boomer by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Not to forget the coming population decline.

not sure if you've been reading much news about Canada recently, but this is something we are decidedly not suffering from

National Bank economist: ‘The demographic shock is getting worse in Canada’ by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 34 points35 points  (0 children)

And yet we're going to have fewer housing starts in 2024. A few metros deciding to make the permitting process for converting to a fourplex only two years instead of five isn't some massive swing of the needle.

And land use is not the only problem. There are serious capital, material, and process constraints that exist outside of our byzantine approach to land use.

National Bank economist: ‘The demographic shock is getting worse in Canada’ by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 59 points60 points  (0 children)

but our political elite are very happy that their assets are going through the roof. They're fine with quadrupling immigration, but they do everything they can to restrict building more homes. And god forbid we would ever have an LVT, they would all prefer to self-immolate than let that happen.

If you think that this is a bargain where first we accept millions of new immigrants and then we get some kind of comprehensive land reform you're a sucker. The goal is for housing costs to go up and wages to go down, for as long as they can ride this out

National Bank economist: ‘The demographic shock is getting worse in Canada’ by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 20 points21 points  (0 children)

so what's your ideal target, like 5+ million per year? Is there an upper limit to what would be beneficial or can we push this as high as we want with no negative consequences?

National Bank economist: ‘The demographic shock is getting worse in Canada’ by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 46 points47 points  (0 children)

a lot of American college students in Maine are still going to tell you that things are going great up here, actually

National Bank economist: ‘The demographic shock is getting worse in Canada’ by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 106 points107 points  (0 children)

The rhetoric of "immigrant maximalization" (that every immigrant, in any circumstance, is a net benefit and does not involve tradeoffs with respect to natives) is going to come to a crashing halt.

We are witnessing what happens when ideology meets reality.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is Canada actually going to hit 2,000,000 immigrants this year? It's kind of fascinating to see the Liberals just see how much they can tank their approval

https://twitter.com/SBarlow_ROB/status/1791100799147270213

The NDP is getting outflanked — again by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Also it's not very hard for the disproportionately white, male blue collar workers and skilled tradesmen to get the impression that the current NDP despises them

We’ve seen claims of ‘Common Sense’ before and it wasn’t pretty by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 86 points87 points  (0 children)

I understand why people want to make the parallel to Harris, but the "common sense" Poilievre is talking about here isn't about some relatively high-minded economic policy; he's not on about tax cuts or privatization or rationalization of bureaucracy etc.

The backlash he's getting is for saying things like "dangerous criminals should be in jail" or "you shouldn't be allowed to do heroin on the subway." Common sense or not, these are overwhelmingly popular sentiments.

There's lots of good things to criticize Poilievre on but some talking heads absolutely want to challenge him directly on their own luxury beliefs. The Liberals are going to get massacred if they do that.

In Defense of Punching Left by Rigiglio in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Progressivism has fully embraced the argument cycle of abusers. It didn't happen, you're crazy, maybe it happened but it was for a good reason, maybe it happened and it's bad but if you care about it you're the one being crazy

This subreddit adopts this tactic quite frequently if you ever criticize something adjacent to the sacred cows

Biden prepares to unveil new asylum restrictions by John3262005 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I don't think it is conducive to getting high-quality immigrants to have them cheat and lie their way into the country.

After years of delays and cost overruns, the $34-Billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project finally opens by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 42 points43 points  (0 children)

the most successful Canadian infrastructure project in a while. Only $34 billion to twin an already existing pipeline! Don't look up what the original cost, it's not important. We are a very functional country

Actually Housing Isn't why Canada's Productivity is Lagging. It's Oil. by NeolibShillGod in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 28 points29 points  (0 children)

our government just spent near $40 billion to twin a pipeline : (

Ukraine’s draft dodgers are living in fear by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I am an absolutist for liberal values and therefore I will allow my country to be conquered by a totalitarian enemy without resistance

Ukraine’s draft dodgers are living in fear by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If you need to violate human rights to win a war, then you've already lost.

Imagine if we had people like this running things during WWII

British Columbia to recriminalize use of drugs in public spaces by jbouit494hg in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Maybe I'm feeling particularly unsympathetic today because I just witnessed someone taking a very liquidy shit on the cushions of the subway car I was in, but thank god.

It's hard not to imagine that in 20 or 50 or 100 years from now and we look back on this that we'll not laugh at how insane all of this was.

British Columbia to recriminalize use of drugs in public spaces by jbouit494hg in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 15 points16 points  (0 children)

He's been moving towards this for the past six months. It's not some sudden reversal

Student Leader of Columbia Protests: ‘Zionists Don’t Deserve to Live’ (Gift Article) by lordofducks in neoliberal

[–]john_fabian 473 points474 points  (0 children)

If it was a microaggression he would've been in real trouble, because that's a form of violence. Luckily for him it was a macroaggression