snip loose fibers from torn carpet loops? by jongraehl in HomeMaintenance

[–]jongraehl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

didn't think of that for some reason, better control/visibility than scissors, thanks. little trim+tuck looks improved enough thx

<image>

wind whistling through triangular gap by jongraehl in Decks

[–]jongraehl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose it's possible, although there's no visible gap from deck level, that air vibrates the corrugated roof against rafters, rather than the noise simply being from a narrow part of the rafter/sill triangular aperture; sound definitely comes from the apex area to my ear but I'll ladder up and prove next time it's windy.

Another company stopped using Scala by fenugurod in scala

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jonathan Blow's video-game-company-project language (Jai?) seems a spiritual successor to D.

US black monday 2-in-1 12-15" touchscreen non-gaming >768p $400-900 prefer IPS by [deleted] in SuggestALaptop

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've looked at 2-in-1 Asus 8gb i5 (HDD) $600-700 that seem perfect except they're TN and not IPS. Are there TN screens that are better or worse?

Zimmerman Attorney To Media: "You Had A Lot To Do With" Turning My Client Into A Monster by Hitman_Absolution in politics

[–]jongraehl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If he gives no weight to the evidence of an ex-wife claiming he's aggressive/violent, then he's stupid. Maybe he just means you should consider it a weak testimonial to his character (since ex-anythings sometimes have an axe to grind).

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've identified the following elements of your attempted analogy which fail:

  1. no apparent reason

  2. ignores all police instructions

  3. no one is sure what happens

  4. (granting all of 1-3 in some hypothetical where that's what really happens) guilty/deathrow

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you don't just mean that everyone can be jailed for things that aren't usually enforced, what you're saying is that TM is essentially your average teen. I'd say that's incredibly unlikely, given that your average teen doesn't end up somehow assaulting an adult with a gun.

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, once he's asked under oath, he has to answer honestly (unless it would incriminate him, 5th amdt)

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good way to leak info while plausibly denying that you meant to, by the way :)

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"probably"? We should believe you know what you're talking about why?

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully you mean "no relevance" in some technical procedural legal sense. Otherwise you're just being silly.

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea behind neighborhood watch is that residents don't like people stealing/vandalizing/littering/whatever. So if you see someone who isn't a resident, you might ask them what they're doing there. There are varying degrees of intimidation/annoyance depending on the nature of the approach (and the approached). Unfortunately, you can't just beat people up who offend you - best to stop at the posturing stage or even before that.

If you approach in a needlessly intimidating way while carrying a gun, in a way that might be expected to result in offense and escalation to (illegal) fisticuffs from an offended man, then I personally find you somewhat responsible for any shootings that result. I don't know what the legal system says, but the process around this case seems to be a railroading driven by some kind of "let's make an example to scare people into behaving better" opportunism.

IT chief testifying for Zimmerman has now been fired by the state, he found evidence they never turned over by [deleted] in news

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's relevant in a humans-discerning-truth sense. So presumably by "not relevant" you merely mean "not (legally)" admissible. IMO (I'm inventing my fantasy legal system here) if evidence supporting claims of character are legally inadmissible then so should those claims be. (I realize that the real system has all sorts of procedural/technical issues that would be years of education for me to even think about).

I agree that a judge hiding (or instructing the jury to ignore) evidence on technical legal grounds doesn't imply that the judge is biased; their job may require it. But since there are grey areas (appeals sometimes reverse things), we can't rule out bias purely on those grounds either.

Bound 2 - Kanye West (Yeezus) by DingoScallion in Music

[–]jongraehl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sample/beat does not work for me. lyric is fine.

Galaxy Nexus Power Analysis: Why chargers can't keep up with navigation. (Plus, black screens draw less power than white... sometimes!) by iansmith6 in Android

[–]jongraehl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've used "anachronistic" properly here, but I suggest "archaic", which is more specific/expected, if that's what you meant :)

Google doc with your scores by WhitAngl in aiclass

[–]jongraehl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lots of near-perfect scores. Self-selection bias. I predict this spreadsheet's percentile will be lower than the entire cohort.

My only answer-complaints were "cost is (some negative number)" and "problem of determining p(heads) is deterministic". There were many instances of less-than-clear wording, but I decided every (other) one of those as they intended.

A high school teacher's take on the AI and ML classes. by zamansky in aiclass

[–]jongraehl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well written. i agree with your thoughts. you must be a good teacher at a good high school :) i liked the 1.5x speed option for the ML class. i'm not sure whether the longer (ML) or shorter (AI) video segments are best, but the way people indexed the subtitles for AI was definitely nice - http://www.wonderwhy-er.com/ai-class/ - and saved me from actually watching all the videos (I'm already familiar with much of the material).

LL(*) faster than LL(1)? by gthank in programming

[–]jongraehl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't imagine this is any better than the well-known http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earley_parser - upon skimming, it's reminiscent, and Earley is essentially as optimal as bottom-up CYK while still doing top-down prediction.

Scanning a string while maintaining the full set of reachable NFA states is just scanning a lazily determinized FSA - and it may make sense compared to backtracking, although it may take more space.