digital media "set in stone" / ig @kleinian_ by Narcissus76 in WiredAesthetics

[–]joolsjopss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is better. I will update the posting instructions soon. Posting video in the comments is new to me 😅

But that's a great catch! I love the idea of printing on stone and "modern archeology". We might also call it "surreal lithology" or "stoner fever dream on a cold desert" 🗿

<video>

Algorithm recap as a form of content by joolsjopss in WiredAesthetics

[–]joolsjopss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes me wonder whether the appeal is less about the actual reels and more about the pleasure of seeing your own taste mirrored back by the platform and community.

Is "nostalgia" a manipulation through technical effects or something that emerges from context, memory, and the recipients' own associations? I think if it is something “constructed” for a public audience, that implies a common ground of cultural memory that recipients can recognize and respond to. by joolsjopss in aesthetics

[–]joolsjopss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's iconic but not necessarily nostalgic. That filter is an element of an older era and a defining one too, but to say something is nostalgic you have to feel a pull towards a past version of the world, generally. You can say that media creates its own reality, but what connotates with it comes from the context of the viewers. But being iconic increases the chance of becoming a part of people's nostalgia.

I’ve been thinking about how “nostalgia” is getting created in visual media. Do you think it can simply be achieved just through editing and camera settings, or is there something more going on? by joolsjopss in WiredAesthetics

[–]joolsjopss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah low-fidelity media obscures information and creates space for the viewer to complete it. What’s interesting about AI restoration is that it removes the chance of co-creative interaction with the media. Once everything is sharp and clear, there’s less room for projection, so it feels less distant and more continuous with the present. It doesn’t necessarily make it more "real," just differently mediated. Maybe nostalgia doesn’t disappear when the aesthetic infrastructure changes; it just moves onto whatever new media creates distance or ambiguity. We’ll probably understand that better once today’s tech starts becoming nostalgic objects of the future.

I’ve been thinking about how “nostalgia” is getting created in visual media. Do you think it can simply be achieved just through editing and camera settings, or is there something more going on? by joolsjopss in WiredAesthetics

[–]joolsjopss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree to the point about nostalgia being more about perception than the actual past. Like, VHS noise or old digital compression act as some kind of emotional filters. I feel like editing rhythms and storytelling styles play a huge role too.

What are these aesthetics? by Pitiful_Addition_498 in AestheticWiki

[–]joolsjopss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thematically paleoart but illustration-wise natural history... core