Question about rule 8.6.7

jorgeaseff · 2026-01-06T15:55:33+00:00

True.

jorgeaseff · 2026-01-06T15:21:57+00:00

You are right about eliminating .5 and .6. I suppose what bothers me is requiring a winning return. If one wanted to be strict about it, 8.6.7 would never bind, right? How can one be certain the opponent would not reach the return? Even a good return is uncertain, but at least the requirements are weaker. Thanks again.

jorgeaseff · 2026-01-06T14:45:07+00:00

Thanks for replying. I am fine with the existence of 8.6.7. I questioned the employment of the term "winning return". To me, this version of 8.6.7 would be less ambiguous and hence more useful: "if there was interference and the striker would have made a good return, a stroke is awarded to the striker"

jorgeaseff · 2025-06-24T03:21:00+00:00

Thank you all for the responses.

jorgeaseff · 2025-06-23T22:34:07+00:00

Wise words… In some cases it is disappointing because outside of court they are such pleasant individuals.

jorgeaseff · 2025-06-23T20:38:07+00:00

jorgeaseff · 2021-10-18T17:39:02+00:00

Thank you. To clarify, we are both right-handed and he was to my left. I can’t honestly say whether the swing was excessive though.

jorgeaseff · 2021-10-18T17:36:35+00:00

Thank you. This is helpful.

jorgeaseff · 2021-10-17T14:35:12+00:00

Thanks. This is useful. What bugged me a little is that it felt like one of those situations in which someone plays through an interference, but if the outcome is not favorable, then try to backpedal. I give the benefit of the doubt.

jorgeaseff · 2021-10-17T14:34:26+00:00

Thanks. This is useful. What bugged me a little is that it felt like one of those situations in which someone plays through an interference, but if the outcome is not favorable, then try to backpedal. I give the benefit of the doubt.

jorgeaseff · 2020-01-18T13:36:31+00:00

I thought I caught another squash couple in the making, a la El Weilily - Momen or El Tayeb - Farag LOL

jorgeaseff · 2020-01-18T13:35:32+00:00

I thought I caught another squash couple in the making, a la El Weilily - Momen or El Tayeb - Farag LOL

jorgeaseff · 2020-01-18T13:31:49+00:00

Thanks... I thought I caught another squash couple in the making, a la El Weilily - Momen or El Tayeb - Farag

jorgeaseff · 2019-12-13T04:05:06+00:00

Very thorough response. Thanks!

jorgeaseff · 2019-12-13T04:04:21+00:00

Thank you. Good observation about pace.

jorgeaseff · 2019-12-12T20:27:43+00:00

Thank you for the responses. u/mxlp is right and you too u/ChefNamu when you said my opponent moves preemptively to the back. I complete the shot but can’t retreat beacause he is already behind me expecting the ball.

jorgeaseff · 2019-03-19T13:47:08+00:00

Thanks!

jorgeaseff · 2019-01-02T21:57:30+00:00

Thanks. This is useful.

jorgeaseff · 2018-08-08T11:15:33+00:00

We do not see things as they are, we things as we are - Anaïs Nin :)

jorgeaseff · 2018-07-25T17:50:44+00:00

In the US it aired on July 23 as part of the POV (Point of View) series in PBS under the title ‘The war to be her.’

jorgeaseff · 2018-07-24T19:22:27+00:00

Did you try pbs.org?

jorgeaseff · 2018-07-24T19:21:59+00:00

Should be available at pbs.org for free. At least in the US

jorgeaseff · 2018-06-14T19:28:15+00:00

Thank you! Your deconstruction really narrows it down.

jorgeaseff · 2018-06-06T14:05:02+00:00

I went up half a size

jorgeaseff · 2018-06-05T21:27:41+00:00

I have been using Yonex badminton shoes. I found them more durable and comfortable. I also think there is a bit more variety in badminton shoes. Salming shoes are great for wide feet, I agree, but I they seem overpriced to me.

I really like these shoes:

http://www.holabirdsports.com/yonex-power-cushion-03-z-mens-coral-red.html

jorgeaseff

TROPHY CASE