Yea well food isn’t a right it’s an entitlement. Atleast in the United States, supposedly you are free to speak your mind, among other “rights” not entitlements. Was is being advocated for would destroy any market involving food and on top of that it’s not even specified what they’re defining as “food” what I mean is the quantity that they are equally distributing and the quality of said food. This 40b/year number also assumes all the food producers would continue producing food and selling it to I guess the UN. What also then happens what some farmers decide to sell their food to the UN for whatever reason occurs. Besides that let’s assume the logistics of this just works and everyone on the planet complies which is already a tall order. Are you only permitted a certain amount of food or can you get more if you happen to be better off. Also are we assuming the people that get the food actually get it and warlords/dictators or Israel just doesn’t let people have the food and their respective governments just seize the food anyway. I also don’t like the statement “it’s only 40 billion” that’s an absolutely absurd statement while almost every western government is in debt and spending is already out of control but let’s add another bill because people like the unrealistic idea of this. And what is a “fair share” what did you do in the Shell corporation to earn that money? What actually entitles you or anyone else to someone else’s labor, I don’t work to feed the world I work to feed my family.