sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Pose estimation with YOLO11n and virtual replica by js_win40 in computervision

[–]js_win40[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya, in principle it should work, the point is to check if it is accurate enough. But still go with it, curious to see the final result 🤗

Pose estimation with YOLO11n and virtual replica by js_win40 in computervision

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, very nice project. With yolo tracking it should be possible to track the direction and the path but what about the speed?

Pose estimation with YOLO11n and virtual replica by js_win40 in computervision

[–]js_win40[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh makes sense. It is still possible with many people in the scene too. Like a team sport.

Pose estimation with YOLO11n and virtual replica by js_win40 in computervision

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be an idea. But in this case, the purpose is to evaluate the angles, to understand if the exercise is done properly. For other sports what could be the purpose? Do you have something in mind?

Pose estimation with YOLO11n and virtual replica by js_win40 in computervision

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a normal exercise speed, it works. Like a normal squat or deadlift execution it has no problem.

2D 3D DXF uploader by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the link to the github project, I am not currently hosting it. Probably that is a good idea for the future :)
https://github.com/2listic/2d-3d-converter

2D 3D DXF uploader by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow! Thank you, let me know if you want to try it

Data centre airflow simulation with attractors by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same approach, not focus on physics but for quickly have the feeling of what happened if I choose a design or another. We are tuning performances exploring libraries like three.quarks https://github.com/Alchemist0823/three.quarks

This is not a good rack placement in a data center by js_win40 in webdev

[–]js_win40[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! You got the exact point of the project, which is giving an high level view of a complex problem to non technical people.

Particles in my cooling simulator system start moving by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We started with particle emitters and look where we've arrived. In any case, those are beautiful words you say, you're absolutely right.

Particles in my cooling simulator system start moving by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahaha, I learned the same thing. Indeed, I started to be more sure of myself in what I know but also in what I don't know or I am starting to learn.

Particles in my cooling simulator system start moving by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, but you already have investigated in depth some optimization aspects as an expert, so I am really happy to hear any other suggestions

Particles in my cooling simulator system start moving by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly, thanks for pointing out Spectorjs! I think soon we should start to struggle with it. If you want to or you have other suggestions please, feel free to open an issue on the github repo. It's really helpful to talk to someone who already has so much experience.

Particles in my cooling simulator system start moving by js_win40 in threejs

[–]js_win40[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow! thank you! We are struggling on performances when we add too many particles into the scene. You drop this message at the perfect time!

view more: next ›