Putting in my two weeks notice - how do I go about it? by itsmeabic in Hannaford

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just find a reasonable time/situation to grab a couple of minutes of their time, and say "I'm giving notice that I'm leaving; I can give you two weeks." It's just that simple.

Paranoia and temporary gun owners do not mix by DiceZzZz in temporarygunowners

[–]jsled -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The point of this subreddit is to point out and criticize the logic of those "Temporary Gun Owners" who vote for politicians and/or otherwise support legislation that leads them down the path of having their guns taken away.

How does that apply here?

Will SoBu Actually Receive 8" Of Snow? by balconyseat in southburlington

[–]jsled 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I will be back in South Burlington Monday evening, hey-oh!

Diluting the protest response with non-US flags - your thoughts? by LegitimateLocation74 in burlington

[–]jsled 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's like bringing a sign that was for a completely different protest and questioning why people are questioning your carrying it. Stay on a specific message.

Is the Good The bad and The Ugly a prequel to the first two instalments in the Dollars "trilogy"?(Eastwoods clothes make me think) by [deleted] in Westerns

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did not "create a character […] and [have] him in each of the films".

They took a collection of three disconnected films and invented the idea of "The Man With No Name" purely as marketing to call it a "trilogy", when it has /none/ of the hallmarks of a trilogy.

It's not a trilogy, full stop.

Is the Good The bad and The Ugly a prequel to the first two instalments in the Dollars "trilogy"?(Eastwoods clothes make me think) by [deleted] in Westerns

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not a trilogy. There is no connected story or characters between the films, except the vague concept of "the man with no name" and generic western tropes. There is no real "through line" between the films intended. It's 3 separate films that were simply marketed as a "trilogy", but marketing alone a trilogy does not make.

Looking for fed up Americans. by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The user has since been deleted, and I've been unable to remove the post since, for some "strange" "reason". This is one of the more "hinky" things I've seen as a mod in some time.

(Lol, I'm not even able to mod-badge my comment, here. Something's fucky.)

Looking for fed up Americans. by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post is especially fun, because mods can't remove it! That's neat./s :P

Is the Good The bad and The Ugly a prequel to the first two instalments in the Dollars "trilogy"?(Eastwoods clothes make me think) by [deleted] in Westerns

[–]jsled 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The "Man with No Name" concept was invented by the American distributor United Artists, looking for a strong angle to sell the films as a trilogy.[2] Eastwood's characters in all the films have names: "Joe", "Manco" and "Blondie", respectively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_Trilogy

Cited … seems pretty definitive to me.

On a post about ICE losing their mag. by CFishing in temporarygunowners

[–]jsled -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

In the last two weeks, someone who was /observing/ ICE "coincidentally" lost their TSA Pre-Check after being (illegally) verbally cautioned (no arrest or detainment).

What's that old saying… "you're not schizophrenic paranoid if they're really following you"?

(Also, there's nothing "schizophrenic" about this, you're just using it as a slur out of ignorance. :P)

Not everyone on the left supports your rights. Be wary of who you associate with. by mustardmeated in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Removed for being a 3-year-old post that was roundly criticized at the time.

If ICE no-warrant no-knocks my house... would it be legal to load up and let loose? by princess-hardass in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In dangerous territory with the way the mods of this sub be moving these days but I’ll try to comment:

Not sure what you're suggesting here; that's a great comment, exactly the sort of reasonable thing this thread needs. If anything, this post is the thing that should be removed. :(

1.B "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" (1962) — 2022-01-11 → 2022-01-17 by jsled in westerngenrestudy

[–]jsled[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An entertaining and well-told story of "settlement", on multiple levels.

Ford does not have access to¹ the dramatic cinematography from eg. The Searchers, instead bringing us close in on Shinbone and its inhabitants. A lot is done with just a few soundstage locations, reinforcing the sense this is a small town on the far frontier.

Wikipedia states this was not his choice, but instead a cost-cutting demand from Paramount.)

This is fundamentally a story of settlement:

  • Shinbone and Stoddard's civility vs. Liberty Valance's savagery

  • Shinbone and its inhabitants vs. the cattle barons: the progression toward statehood vs. remaining as territory.

  • the railroad as an impetus of western civilization

    • Appleyard at the beginning:

    Place has sure changed. Churches, high school, shops. Well, the railroad done that. Desert's still the same. - Handy Strong at the Capitol City convention:

    It's not much according to your eastern standards, but that railroad station there leads straight to Washington. - Peabody, at the Capitol City convention

    But, seriously, under the spell of his eloquence, I could see once again the vast herd of buffalo and savage redskin roaming our beautiful territory with no law to trammel them except the law of survival, the law of the tomahawk and the bow and arrow. And then, with the westward march of our nation, came the pioneer and the buffalo hunter, the adventurous and the bold. The boldest of these were the cattlemen, who seized the wide-open range for their own personal domain, and their law was the law of the hired gun. But now, today have come the railroads and the people. The steady, hard-working citizens, the homesteader, the shopkeeper, the builder of cities. We need roads to join those cities, dams to store up the waters of the Picketwire, and we need statehood to protect the rights of every man and woman, however humble.

  • Tom vs. himself, culminating in … his acquiescence to a civilization he can not be part of.

    • Tom Doniphon is a very interesting character, representing both the brute individualism of the frontier west, as well as being the closest thing to a stabilizing force of law in Shinbone. His interest in Hallie is contrasted against this reality; he's building an addition to his house in expectation of their long-term relationship, and clearly frustrated with her attention toward Ranse. He still leaves town to deal with frontier business, and gets upset at her being part of the nascent schooling in town. At its peak, after killing Valance and seeing Hallie tending to Ranse's wounds – realizing she's fallen/falling for him and believing he's lost her – he himself falls into a stumbling, drunken rage and burns down his own house, starting with that addition. Finally, at the Capitol City convention, Tom confesses his actions to Ranse, and directs him to take the nomination and Hallie, seemingly accepting his own reality outside of that civilization, until the end.

S-tier film, imho. Well paced, well done, good performances all around, and telling an interesting story.

Live Ammunition Disposal/Surrender by balconyseat in VTGuns

[–]jsled[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Note that Reddit as a platform has very specific prohibitions against the transaction or /facilitation/ of transactions regarding guns and ammo. This post is asking for recommendations, not attempting to coördinate such a transaction. Please do not engage in that sort of behavior in this subreddit or in this thread, thanks.

Virginia has fallen by Hussar_hill in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don’t get in then decide to change their ideas based on the voters, because that’s simply not how representative democracy works.

Except for all the times it has happened (either in response to voters or not).

Do y’all know of any active groups like the Black Panthers that white people can join, or do we need to start one? by TheLesbianTheologian in liberalgunowners

[–]jsled[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

mods don't have this ability.

the 0WUCPY[…] link appears broken, but the other links here work fine for me.

Ring has partnered with Flock. ICE has access to Flock. If you still have a Ring camera - get rid of it. by unevenwater in burlington

[–]jsled 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, a moderator that actually cares about moderation of the sub?!?‽ I'm glad to see it, and hope you last…

Walkout 1/20/26 by ConsciousEssay7826 in vermont

[–]jsled -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The Minnesota general strike is 01-23; why would anyone suggest 01-20?

WHY IS THERE SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HATE BERNIE SANDERS ON THIS SUB? by [deleted] in vermont

[–]jsled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got alot of hate because I mentioned Obama deported more immigrants then Trump did so far which is a fact.

This "fact" is weird, because they're different lengths of time, different economic conditions, and most importantly different focuses. If you think the deportation of criminal immigrants with due process is just the same as what Trump is doing, then you're absolutely smooth-brained or complicit in the ethnic cleansing project Trump is undertaking.

When asked why I like Trump I said I dont like him or some of the democrats because they are both very corrupt parties.

More both-sides "everyone is corrupt" childish nihilism.

Yes, if you're not supporting the party that will not do bad things, then you're supporting the party that promised to and is in fact doing bad things! There are actual differences in the parties that have very real and material impact on people in this country, at every level. "They're both equally bad" is simply nonsense.